[Modified method for determining the normal values of the aortic root diameter in the focus of aortic pathology in individuals with congenital connective tissue disorders].

INTRODUCTION: Enlargement of the aortic root of occurs in many cases with cardiovascular disease, including congenital connective tissue disorders (CCTD), especially its differentiated and undifferentiated forms (UCCTD). A common deficiency of the generally accepted methods for diagnosing an aortic root dilation may be that persons with CCTD and cardiovascular diseases of potentially having a broader aortic root diameter could be included in the reference groups. The purpose of our study was to develop a modified method for determining the normal aortic root diameter in group of individuals without CCTD and cardiovascular diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 464 apparently healthy people, men and women aged 15 to 65 years. All patients underwent general clinical examination, echocardiography. On the basis of external and internal signs of CCTD, patients with UCCTD were identified - the UCCTD group (n = 208) and without this pathology - the main group (n = 256). The calculation of the normal aortic root diameter (NARD) was made in accordance with the methods of Roman M. J. et al. (1989) and Devereux R. B. et al. (2012). The upper limit values of NARD (UL NARD) were calculated according to the algorithms of Roman M. J. et al. (1989), Devereux R. B. et al. (2012), Campens L. et al. (2014). RESULTS: The data obtained in the main group was used to develop a modified method for the determination of NARD. The mean values by echocardiography and calculated values of the aortic root by modified method of this study were practically the same in the main group, whereas the mean value of NARD calculated by the methods of Roman M. J. et al. and Devereux R. B. et al. in this sample were significantly higher in relation to the listed values. As the NARD values, the UL NARD were significantly higher for all evaluated algorithms in comparison with the modified method. In the group of patients with UCCTD, 13 cases of aortic root dilation were found according to the method of Roman M. J., compared to 19 cases by the modified method. At the same time, 3 patients with aortic root enlargement by the mew method had 7 points of systemic involvement, thus corresponding to the Ghent criteria of Marfan syndrome. The methods of Campens L. and Devereux R. B. were less sensitive, revealing only 5 and 1 patients with aortic root dilatation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study demonstrate that, in order to obtain more reliable information on the condition of the root of the aorta and its proper values, the modified method obtained in the course of the study can be used. This method is more sensitive in detecting the enlargement of the aortic root in CCTD and in diagnosing syndromic CCTD.

[Controlled diuretic monotherapy in hypertensive patients: Efficiency and metabolic safety]. / Kontroliruemaya monoterapiya diuretikami u bol'nykh arterial'noi gipertoniei: effektivnost' i metabolicheskaya bezopasnost'.

AIM: To evaluate the antihypertensive efficiency and metabolic effects of controlled monotherapy with hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) and indapamide retard (IR) in hypertensive patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study included 50 patients with Stage II essential hypertension, grades 1-3 blood pressure (BP) elevation, who received 3-month monotherapy with IR (n=25) or HCT (n=25). Changes were determined in BP, blood lipid, glucose, and potassium levels. The efficiency of antihypertensive therapy was evaluated in the entire group and subgroups of patients identified in accordance with the used diuretic and the presence (n=27) or absence (n=23) of therapy at previous stages. RESULTS: A total of 54% of the patients included in the study achieved target BP after 3 months of therapy. The proportion of individuals with normalized BP was comparable in the HCT and IR groups (52 and 56%, respectively) and in previously treated patients and those who used for the first time antihypertensive drugs (51.8 and 56.5%, respectively). Normalization of systolic and diastolic BPs was achieved in 78 and 58% of the patients, respectively. Target BP was achieved in 94,1%, 42,9% and 16,7% of patients with grades 1,2 and 3 hypertension, respectively. IR proved to be metabolically neutral whereas HCT was found to significantly increase the blood levels of triglycerides and glucose by 15.3% (p<0.05) and 12.2% (p<0.05), respectively. CONCLUSION: Controlled diuretic monotherapy allows BP normalization in more than 50% of the hypertensive patients. HCT and IR have similar antihypertensive efficiency. Because of the negative changes observed in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism with the use of relatively small doses of HCT, IR is a preferential alternative in the long-term treatment of hypertensive patients.

[Direct comparison of endothelial and metabolic effects of perindopril combination with indapamide retard or hydrochlorothiazide].

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare changes of vascular and metabolic parameters in patients with essential hypertension on treatment with combination of perindopril with either indapamide retard or hydrochlorothiazide. METHODS: The study involved 40 patients who were randomly assigned to perindopril 5-10 mg/day in combination with indapamide retard (P+I) 1.5 mg/day (n = 20) or with hydrochlorothiazide (P+HT) 25 mg/day (n=20). Waist circumference, body mass index, blood lipids and glucose, endothelial function (EF) determined as the change of resistance index after inhalation of salbutamol, arterial stiffness measured as mean pulse wave velocity after sublingual trinitroglycerin (PWVtng) were evaluated at baseline and 6 months thereafter. Vascular responses were calculated from digital pulse waves registered using photoplethysmography. RESULTS: Dynamics of BP after 6 months did not differ significantly between groups. Treatment with combination of P+HT resulted in significant decrease of EF (-24,3%, p<0,05) accompanied by negative changes of triglycerides (+13,4%, p<0,05) and glucose levels (+9,8%, p<0,05), whereas combination of P+I did not affect endothelial function and was metabolically neutral. PWVtng significantly decreases on both regiments of treatment with the trend in favor of P+I combination (-13,4%, p<0,001 versus -9,8%, p<0,01 for P+I and P+HT combinations, respectively). CONCLUSION: Thus, despite the similar BP reduction the combination of ACE-inhibitor--perindopril with indapamide retard possesses more favorable vascular and metabolic effects compared to combination with hydrochlorothiazide that potentially may account for different prognosis of patients with arterial hypertension on long-term treatment.