The efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women by baseline kidney function status.

INTRODUCTION: Two global, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phase-3 studies (2-year prevention (n = 1583) and 3-year treatment (n = 7492)) have shown that bazedoxifene (BZA) is safe and effective for prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy/safety of BZA according to baseline kidney function. METHODS: Data for the BZA 20- and 40-mg and placebo groups from both studies were integrated for assessment of bone turnover markers (BTMs), bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture incidence (treatment study only). Safety was assessed using integrated data for the BZA, placebo, and raloxifene 60-mg groups from both studies. Baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation; among subjects with baseline GFR, renal function categories were defined by GFR (ml/min per 1.73 m(2)): normal (GFR ≥ 90; n = 1982), mild impairment (60 ≤ GFR < 90; n = 6032), or moderate/severe impairment (GFR < 60; n = 723). RESULTS: Demographics were similar across treatment groups and within GFR subgroups. Across GFR subgroups, BZA 20 and 40 mg reduced BTM levels and improved lumbar spine and total hip BMD versus placebo. At month 24, there were significant treatment-by-GFR (p = 0.003) and treatment-by-serum creatinine (p = 0.034) interactions for the increase in lumbar spine BMD versus placebo. Fracture incidence was lower with BZA than placebo across all GFR categories, with no treatment-by-GFR interaction. There were no significant differences among treatment groups in incidences of overall, serious, or renal-related adverse events across GFR subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Mild to moderate kidney impairment did not affect the efficacy and safety of BZA in postmenopausal women.

Hot flush symptom-free days with bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the number of hot flush symptom-free days in symptomatic postmenopausal women treated with bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens (BZA/CE). METHODS: In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase-3 study, 322 postmenopausal women aged 40-65 years with an intact uterus who had ≥ seven moderate-to-severe daily hot flushes (or ≥ 50 per week) were randomized to BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 or 0.625 mg or placebo. Subjects recorded the incidence and severity of hot flushes on daily diary cards. In this secondary analysis, the number of days per week without hot flushes from baseline to week 12 was determined. The percentage of women who experienced no hot flushes at week 12 was also evaluated. RESULTS: From baseline to week 12, the number of days per week without moderate-to-severe hot flushes or without any hot flushes steadily increased for women treated with BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 or 0.625 mg versus placebo. In addition, the rate of increase in days per week without any hot flushes was significantly greater with either BZA/CE dose than with placebo (p < 0.0001). Compared with placebo, the percentage of women who experienced no moderate-to-severe hot flushes or no severe hot flushes at week 12 was greater with BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively) and BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg (p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: BZA/CE increased the number of hot flush symptom-free days and the proportion of women without hot flushes over 12 weeks of therapy.

Effects of bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens on endometrial safety and bone in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVES: Bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens (BZA/CE) has demonstrated efficacy in improving vasomotor and vulvar/vaginal atrophy symptoms in postmenopausal women. This study evaluated the endometrial safety of BZA/CE and effects on bone mineral density (BMD) compared with CE/medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and placebo. METHODS: The Selective estrogens, Menopause, And Response to Therapy (SMART)-4 trial was a 1-year, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, phase-3 study in non-hysterectomized, postmenopausal women (n = 1061; aged 40 -< 65 years). Subjects received BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 or 0.625 mg, CE 0.45 mg/MPA 1.5 mg, or placebo daily. Primary endpoints were the incidence of endometrial hyperplasia and the change in lumbar spine BMD at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included the change in total hip BMD and rates of amenorrhea and breast pain. RESULTS: At 1 year, no cases of endometrial hyperplasia were identified in the BZA 20-mg/CE 0.45-mg group, while three cases (1.1%) were confirmed for the BZA 20-mg/CE 0.625-mg group (95% one-sided confidence interval upper limit < 4%). Both BZA/CE doses significantly increased lumbar spine and total hip BMD versus placebo (p ≤ 0.001) and showed low incidences of bleeding and breast tenderness, similar to placebo and significantly lower than for CE 0.45 mg/MPA 1.5 mg (p < 0.05). BZA/CE treatment was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 and 0.625 mg significantly improved BMD while maintaining endometrial safety and showed a favorable safety/tolerability profile over 1 year. BZA/CE may be a promising therapy for treating menopausal symptoms and preventing osteoporosis in non-hysterectomized, postmenopausal women.

Sustained efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results of a 5-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

UNLABELLED: In this 2-year extension of a 3-year study, bazedoxifene showed sustained efficacy in preventing new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and in preventing non-vertebral fractures in higher-risk women. Bazedoxifene significantly increased bone mineral density and reduced bone turnover versus placebo and was generally safe and well tolerated. INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis over 5 years. METHODS: A total of 4,216 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in this 2-year extension of a 3-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. In the core study (N = 7,492), subjects received bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg/day, raloxifene 60 mg/day, or placebo. The raloxifene arm was discontinued after 3 years; subjects receiving bazedoxifene 40 mg were transitioned to bazedoxifene 20 mg after 4 years. Five-year findings are reported for bazedoxifene 20 and 40/20 mg and placebo. Endpoints included incidence of new vertebral fractures (primary) and non-vertebral fractures, and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers. RESULTS: At 5 years, the incidence of new vertebral fractures in the intent-to-treat population was significantly lower with bazedoxifene 20 mg (4.5%) and 40/20 mg (3.9%) versus placebo (6.8%; P < 0.05), with relative risk reductions of 35% and 40%, respectively. Non-vertebral fracture incidence was similar among groups. In a subgroup of higher-risk women (n = 1,324; femoral neck T-score ≤-3.0 and/or ≥ 1 moderate or severe or ≥ 2 mild vertebral fracture[s]), bazedoxifene 20 mg reduced non-vertebral fracture risk versus placebo (37%; P = 0.06); combined data for bazedoxifene 20 and 40/20 mg reached statistical significance (34% reduction; P < 0.05). Bazedoxifene significantly increased BMD and reduced bone turnover versus placebo (P < 0.05) and was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support a sustained anti-fracture effect of bazedoxifene on new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporotic women and on non-vertebral fractures in the higher-risk subgroup of women.

Safety and tolerability of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results of a 5-year, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

UNLABELLED: Findings from this 5-year phase 3 study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis showed that bazedoxifene was associated with an overall favorable safety and tolerability profile, with no evidence of endometrial or breast stimulation. Overall, the results at 5 years were consistent with those seen at 3 years. INTRODUCTION: We report safety and tolerability findings from a 5-year randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: In the core study, healthy postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (N=7,492; mean age, 66.4 years) were randomized to daily doses of bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg, raloxifene 60 mg, or placebo for 3 years. During the 2-year study extension, the raloxifene 60-mg treatment arm was discontinued after the 3-year database was finalized, and subjects receiving bazedoxifene 40 mg were transitioned in a blinded manner to bazedoxifene 20 mg (bazedoxifene 40-/20-mg group) after 4 years. Safety and tolerability data are reported for subjects in the bazedoxifene 20- and 40-/20-mg and placebo groups; efficacy findings are reported elsewhere. RESULTS: A total of 3,146 subjects in the bazedoxifene 20- and 40-mg and placebo groups were enrolled in the extension study (years 4 and 5). Overall, the 5-year incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs were similar among groups. The incidence of hot flushes and leg cramps was higher with bazedoxifene compared with placebo. Venous thromboembolic events, primarily deep vein thrombosis, were more frequently reported in the bazedoxifene groups compared with the placebo group. Reports of cardiac disorders and cerebrovascular events were few and evenly distributed among groups. Bazedoxifene showed a neutral effect on the breast and endometrium. CONCLUSION: Bazedoxifene was associated with an overall favorable safety and tolerability profile in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis over 5 years of therapy, consistent with findings at 3 years.

Efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal Asian women.

UNLABELLED: This 6-month study examined the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene 20 mg in postmenopausal Asian women. Bazedoxifene showed statistically significant improvements over placebo in bone mineral density at all skeletal sites evaluated. Bazedoxifene significantly reduced bone turnover and had favorable effects on lipid parameters. Bazedoxifene was safe and well tolerated. INTRODUCTION: This 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study conducted in China, Korea, and Taiwan evaluated the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal Asian women. METHODS: Generally, healthy postmenopausal Asian women (N=487; mean age, 57.2 years; mean lumbar spine bone mineral density [BMD], -1.1) were randomized to daily therapy with bazedoxifene 20 mg or placebo; all subjects received daily supplemental calcium carbonate 600 mg. The changes from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine (primary end point) and at other skeletal sites, bone turnover markers, and lipid parameters were evaluated at 6 months. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) reporting and physical/gynecologic examination. RESULTS: At 6 months, women who received bazedoxifene 20 mg had significantly greater BMD compared with those receiving placebo at the lumbar spine (0.41% vs -0.32%, P<0.01), femoral neck (-0.08% vs -0.69%, P=0.014), trochanter (0.50% vs -0.23%, P=0.010), and total hip (-0.03% vs -0.77%, P<0.001), respectively. Bazedoxifene 20 mg was also associated with significant differences from placebo in median percent reductions from baseline in serum C-telopeptide (-21.8%, P<0.001) and osteocalcin (-12.9%, P<0.001) levels and total (-5.0%, P<0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-9.5%, P<0.001) levels. The incidence of AEs was not different between subjects treated with bazedoxifene and those who received placebo. CONCLUSION: Bazedoxifene was generally safe and effective in preventing bone loss in this short-term study of postmenopausal Asian women.

Statistical validation of surrogate endpoints: is bone density a valid surrogate for fracture?

In the treatment of osteoporosis using anti-resorptive agents there has been increasing interest in quantifying the relationship between fracture endpoints and surrogates such as bone mineral density (BMD) or bone turnover markers. Statistical methodology constitutes a critical component of assessing surrogate validity. Depending on study designs, data resources, and statistical methods used for analyses, one has to use caution when interpreting results from different analyses, especially when results are disparate. For example, analyses based on individual patient data reported that only a limited proportion of the anti-fracture efficacy was explained by BMD increases for agents such as alendronate, risedronate and raloxifene. Analyses employing meta-regression based on summary statistics, however, indicated that most of the anti-fracture benefits were due to improvements in BMD. In this paper, we review definitions of surrogate endpoints and requirements for their statistical validation. We evaluate whether BMD meets these requirements as a possible surrogate for fracture. Our review indicates that the actual BMD value is correlated with fracture risk and thus BMD is useful in identifying patients that might need treatment. There is limited evidence to support BMD increase with anti-resorptive agents as a reliable substitute for fracture risk reduction. Strengths and limitations for various statistical methods are discussed.

Seven years of treatment with risedronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

The effects of 7 years of risedronate treatment were evaluated in a second 2-year extension of a 3-year vertebral fracture study in women with osteoporosis. For the first 5 years of the study, women received risedronate 5 mg/day or placebo according to the original randomization, with maintenance of blinding. All the women who entered into the 6-7 years extension study received risedronate 5 mg/day. Endpoints included vertebral and nonvertebral fracture assessments, changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover, and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. A total of 164 women (placebo/risedronate group, 81; risedronate group, 83) entered the 6-7 years extension study and 136 (83%) completed the study. Annualized incidence of new vertebral fractures during the 6-7 years was similar between the 2 treatment groups (3.8%). The incidence of vertebral fractures did not change in the 7-year risedronate group during the 6-7 years as compared to 4-5 years, while a significant reduction was observed in the placebo group that switched to risedronate treatment during years 6-7. The incidence of nonvertebral fractures was 7.4% and 6.0% in the placebo/risedronate and risedronate groups, respectively, during years 6-7. Urinary N-telopeptide decreased from baseline by 54% and 63% at 3 months and 7 years, respectively, in the risedronate group. The increases in BMD from baseline after 5 years of risedronate treatment were maintained or increased further during years 6-7; lumbar spine BMD after 5 and 7 years of risedronate treatment increased from baseline by 8.8% and 11.5%, respectively, for this extension study population. Risedronate was well tolerated and the occurrence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events was low. After 7 years of continuous risedronate treatment there were significant increases in BMD and decreases in bone turnover to within premenopausal levels and there was no indication of any loss of anti-fracture efficacy.

Two-year efficacy and tolerability of risedronate once a week for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and tolerability of risedronate once-a-week dosing (35 and 50mg) were compared with risedronate daily dosing (5mg) in a 2-year study in women with osteoporosis. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, active-control study with lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) as the primary efficacy endpoint at 1 year. Subjects were women aged 50 years or older, postmenopausal for at least 5 years, and had either a BMD T-score of -2.5 or lower (lumbar spine or total proximal femur) or a T-score lower than -2 and at least one prevalent vertebral fracture. In addition to risedronate treatment, the subjects received 1000 mg daily of elemental calcium supplementation and received vitamin D if the baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) level was low. RESULTS: The results after 1 year of treatment were previously published. Of the 1456 women who were randomized and received study medication, 1127 (77%) completed the 2-year study. Over the 2 years of treatment, the incidence of both new vertebral fractures (2.9, 1.5, and 1.7% for the 5, 35, and 50 mg groups, respectively; for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who p = 0.298) and osteoporosis-related non-vertebral fractures reported as adverse events (5.0, 4.9, and 4.5% for the 5, 35, and 50 mg groups, respectively; p = 0.918) was similar for all 3 treatment groups. The reduction from baseline at Month 24 in bone turnover markers was similar based on an analysis of variance for the 5 mg daily and the 35 mg once-a-week groups. The mean percentage change in lumbar spine BMD after 24 months was 5.17, 4.74, and 5.47% for the 5, 35, and 50 mg groups, respectively. Both the 35 and 50 mg once-a-week treatment groups met the pre-specified criterion of non-inferiority to the 5 mg daily treatment group. No apparent difference in the pattern or distribution of serious and upper gastrointestinal adverse events was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year data agree with the 1-year results demonstrating that the risedronate once-a-week doses are comparable in efficacy and safety to the 5 mg daily dose. Risedronate 35 mg once a week is considered the optimal dose want a once-a-week dosing regimen.

Risedronate increases bone density and reduces vertebral fracture risk within one year in men on corticosteroid therapy.

Limited information is available on the effect of bisphosphonates in men receiving corticosteroid therapy. We studied 184 men among the patients enrolled in two, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 1-year studies with similar protocols. The studies evaluated the effects of risedronate in patients beginning corticosteroid treatment at a dose of at least 7.5 mg per day of prednisone or equivalent (prevention study) or continuing long-term treatment of corticosteroid at that dose (treatment study). The men received either placebo or risedronate (2.5 mg or 5 mg) daily, along with calcium supplementation (500-1000 mg). Endpoints included differences in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter, assessment of vertebral fractures, changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover, and overall safety. In the treatment study, risedronate 5 mg significantly (P < 0.01) increased lumbar spine BMD by 4.8% at the lumbar spine, 2.1% at the femoral neck, and 2.6% at the femoral trochanter compared with baseline values. In the prevention study, bone loss was prevented with risedronate 5 mg; in the placebo group, BMD decreased significantly (P < 0.01) by 3.4%, 3.3%, and 3.4% in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter, respectively, at 1 year. The differences between risedronate 5 mg and placebo groups were significant at all skeletal sites in the prevention study (P < 0.01) and at the lumbar spine in the treatment study (P < 0.001). The 2.5 mg dose also had a positive effect on BMD, although of a lesser magnitude than the 5 mg dose. When the data from the two studies were combined, the incidence of vertebral fractures decreased 82.4% (95% confidence interval, 36.6%-95.1%) in the pooled risedronate groups compared with placebo (P = 0.008). Risedronate was well tolerated in men, with a similar incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events in the placebo and treatment groups. Daily treatment with risedronate increases bone density and decreases vertebral fracture risk within 1 year in men receiving corticosteroid therapy.

Effect of combined risedronate and hormone replacement therapies on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Both hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and bisphosphonates are efficacious in the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Combined therapy with bisphosphonate and HRT is likely to be used in clinical practice, and limited data are available regarding its efficacy and safety. This was a 1-yr, double blind, placebo-controlled study in which 524 postmenopausal women received daily treatment with conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 mg) alone or in combination with risedronate (5 mg). Women who had not undergone hysterectomy received medroxyprogesterone acetate (up to 5 mg, daily or cyclically) at the discretion of the investigator. The primary efficacy end point was the percent change from baseline in mean lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at 1 yr. Changes in BMD at the proximal femur and forearm, bone turnover markers, and histology and histomorphometry were also assessed. At 12 months, significant (P < 0.05) increases from baseline in lumbar spine BMD were observed in both treatment groups (HRT-only, 4.6%; combined risedronate-HRT, 5.2%); the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Both therapies led to significant increases in BMD at 12 months at the femoral neck (1.8% and 2.7%, respectively), femoral trochanter (3.2% and 3.7%), distal radius (1.7% and 1.6%), and midshaft radius (0.4% and 0.7%). The differences between groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) at the femoral neck and midshaft radius. Both combined risedronate-HRT and HRT-only produced significant decreases in the biochemical markers of bone turnover, with somewhat greater decreases in the combined treatment group. Bone biopsy data showed normal bone structure and normal mineralization with either treatment. Expected decreases in bone turnover were observed and were greater in the combined treatment group (68-79% reduction relative to baseline values, P < 0.005). Overall, combined treatment had a safety profile similar to that of HRT-only, including bone and gastrointestinal safety profiles. In conclusion, the combined treatment with risedronate and HRT had a favorable effect on BMD similar to that of HRT alone at the lumbar spine and slightly, but significantly, greater than that of HRT alone at the femoral neck and midshaft radius. The combined treatment was well tolerated, and there were no adverse effects on the skeleton.

Effects of risedronate treatment on bone density and vertebral fracture in patients on corticosteroid therapy.

Men and women (n = 518) receiving moderate-to-high doses of corticosteroids were enrolled in two studies with similar protocols and randomly assigned to receive either placebo or risedronate (2.5 or 5 mg) for 1 year. All patients received daily calcium supplementation (500-1000 mg), and most also received supplemental vitamin D (400 IU). The primary endpoint was the difference between the placebo and active groups in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at 1 year; changes in BMD at other sites, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and the incidence of vertebral fractures were also assessed. In the overall population, the mean (SE) lumbar spine BMD increased 1.9 +/- 0.38% from baseline in the risedronate 5 mg group (P < 0.001) and decreased 1.0 +/- 0.4% in the placebo group (P = 0. 005). BMD at the femoral neck, trochanter, and distal radius increased or was maintained with risedronate 5 mg treatment, but decreased in the placebo group. Midshaft radius BMD did not change significantly in either treatment group. The difference in BMD between the risedronate 5 mg and placebo groups was significant at all skeletal sites (P < 0.05) except the midshaft radius at 1 year. The 2.5 mg dose also had a positive effect on BMD, although of a lesser magnitude than that seen with risedronate 5 mg. A significant reduction of 70% in vertebral fracture risk was observed in the risedronate 5 mg group compared with the placebo group (P = 0.01). Risedronate was efficacious in both men and women, irrespective of underlying disease and duration of corticosteroid therapy, and had a favorable safety profile, with a similar incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events in the placebo and active treatment groups. Daily treatment with risedronate 5 mg significantly increases BMD and decreases vertebral fracture risk in patients receiving moderate-to-high doses of corticosteroid therapy.

Prevention of bone loss with risedronate in glucocorticoid-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients.

The aim of the study was to assess risedronate's effect on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis receiving glucocorticoids. We carried out a two center, 2 year, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial with a third year of nontreatment follow-up. We studied 120 women requiring long-term glucocorticoid therapy at > 2.5 mg/day prednisolone randomized to treatment with daily placebo; daily 2.5 mg risedronate; or cyclical 15 mg risedronate (2 out of 12 weeks). At 97 weeks, bone mineral density was maintained at the lumbar spine (+1.4%) and trochanter (+0.4%) in the daily 2.5 mg risedronate group, while significant bone loss occurred in the placebo group (-1.6%, p = 0.03; and 4.0%, p < 0.005, respectively). At the femoral neck, there was a nonsignificant bone loss in the daily 2.5 mg risedronate group (-1.0%) while in the placebo group bone mass decreased significantly (-3.6%, p < 0.001). The difference between placebo and daily 2.5 mg risedronate groups was significant at the lumbar spine (p = 0.009) and trochanter (p = 0.02) but did not reach statistical significance at the femoral neck. Although not significantly different from placebo at the lumbar spine, the overall effect of the cyclical regimen was similar to that of the daily 2.5 mg risedronate regimen. Treatment withdrawal led to bone loss in the risedronate groups that was significant at the lumbar spine. A similar number of patients experienced adverse events (including upper gastrointestinal events) across treatment groups and risedronate was generally well tolerated. Thus risedronate preserves bone mass in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis receiving glucocorticoids while patients receiving a placebo have significant bone loss.

Improvement of pagetic bone lesions with risedronate treatment: a radiologic study.

Risedronate is a potent pyridinyl bisphosphonate in clinical development for treatment and prevention of osteoporosis, and has been recently approved for treatment of Paget's disease in the United States. An open-label study was conducted to determine the effect of risedronate treatment on pagetic bone lesions in patients with moderate to severe Paget's disease (mean serum alkaline phosphatase levels [ALP] approximately seven times the upper limit of normal). Patients were treated with 30 mg/day oral risedronate for 84 days followed by a 112-day nontreatment period. This 196-day cycle was repeated once in patients whose ALP did not normalize or who experienced relapse, defined as a > or =25% increase in ALP from the lowest value measured. Radiographs of affected anatomical sites in 26 patients were collected at baseline, 6 months, and/or 12 months. Eleven patients received one course and 15 patients received two courses of treatment. Radiographs were examined by a skeletal radiologist who was blinded to their time sequence. Changes in pagetic lesions were categorized as "improved," "deteriorated," or "no change." Between baseline and 6 months, 16 patients improved and 3 deteriorated; at 12 months, 11 patients improved and 2 deteriorated. Most lesions remained unchanged between 6 and 12 months. Improvements were noted in all skeletal sites (tibia, femur, humerus, forearm, pelvis, spine, and skull), but were most pronounced in weight-bearing long bones. In weight-bearing bones, nine lesions had osteolytic fronts. Of these, seven improved and two remained unchanged at 6 months; at 12 months, all but one lesion (which improved) remained unchanged. This radiographic assessment demonstrates that oral risedronate, 30 mg/day in one or two 3-month courses, is highly effective for improving bone lesions in patients with Paget's disease. Risedronate treatment had no deleterious effect on osteolytic lesions in weight-bearing bones; indeed, the majority of lesions with osteolytic fronts were improved after 6 months of risedronate treatment.

Risedronate therapy prevents corticosteroid-induced bone loss: a twelve-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

OBJECTIVE: Risedronate, a new pyridinyl bisphosphonate, is a potent antiresorptive bone agent. This study examines the safety and efficacy of daily, oral risedronate therapy for the prevention of corticosteroid-induced bone loss. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in 224 men and women who were initiating long-term corticosteroid treatment. Patients received either risedronate (2.5 mg or 5 mg) or placebo daily for 12 months. Each patient also received 500 mg of elemental calcium daily. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD). Secondary measures included proximal femur BMD and incidence of vertebral fractures. RESULTS: After 12 months, the lumbar spine BMD (mean +/- SEM) did not change significantly compared with baseline in the 5-mg (0.6 +/- 0.5%) or the 2.5-mg (-0.1 +/- 0.7%) risedronate groups, while it decreased in the placebo group (-2.8 +/- 0.5%; P < 0.05). The mean differences in BMD between the 5-mg risedronate and the placebo groups were 3.8 +/- 0.8% at the lumbar spine (P < 0.001), 4.1 +/- 1.0% at the femoral neck (P < 0.001), and 4.6 +/- 0.8% at the femoral trochanter (P < 0.001). A trend toward a decrease in the incidence of vertebral fracture was observed in the 5-mg risedronate group compared with the placebo group (5.7% versus 17.3%; P = 0.072). Risedronate was well tolerated, and the incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events was comparable among the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Risedronate therapy prevents bone loss in patients initiating long-term corticosteroid treatment.

Risedronate in the treatment of Paget's disease of bone: an open label, multicenter study.

An open-label, multicenter study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of oral risedronate (a pyridinyl bisphosphonate) in 162 patients (102 men, 60 postmenopausal women; mean age, 68 years) with moderate to severe Paget's disease of bone (mean serum alkaline phosphatase [ALP] approximately seven times the upper limit of normal). Patients were treated with oral risedronate, 30 mg/day for 84 days, followed by 112 days without treatment. This 196-day cycle was repeated once if serum ALP did not normalize or increased from the nadir value by > or = 25%. At the end of the first and second cycles, the mean percentage decreases for serum ALP were 65.7% and 69.1%, and for urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine 50.4% and 66.9%, respectively. The decreases from baseline in ALP and urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine were significant (p < 0.001). Normalization of serum ALP was observed in 86 patients (53.8%): 53 during the first treatment cycle and 33 during the second. There was a significant proportion of patients reporting a decrease in the pagetic bone pain at days 84 and 196 (p < 0.001). Overall, risedronate was well tolerated. Five patients withdrew due to adverse events, none of which were considered to be drug related. In conclusion, 30 mg of oral risedronate administered daily for 84 days significantly reduced the biochemical indices of disease activity and was associated with pain reduction in patients with moderate to severe Paget's disease of bone. Normalization of ALP was observed in the majority of patients. Repeated administration of risedronate was shown to be beneficial. In general, risedronate was well tolerated and demonstrated a good safety profile.

Paget's disease of bone: reduction of disease activity with oral risedronate.

Risedronate monosodium [1-hydroxy-2-(3-pyridinyl)ethylidene bisphosphonic acid monosodium salt] is a pyridinyl bisphosphonate drug under development as a treatment for Paget's disease of bone and other metabolic bone disorders. An open-label, single-center study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of oral resedronate in patients with severe Paget's disease [mean baseline serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) about six times the upper limit of normal]. 20 patients (12 men, 8 women; mean age 74 years) were treated with 30 mg/day of oral risedronate for 84 days, followed by 112 days without treatment. This 196 day period was repeated once in 19 patients in whom ALP did not reach the midpoint of the normal range or increased by > or = 25% from the nadir value by the end of the first 196 day period. At the end of the first 196 day period, the mean percentage decrease from baseline in excess ALP and excess urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine (OHP/Cr) was 79.5% and 85.5%, respectively (excess defined as difference between the patient's ALP or OHP/Cr and midpoint of the normal range). At the end of the second period, the decreases were 86.3% and 101.3%, respectively. The decreases in excess ALP and OHP/Cr were significant (p < 0.0001). In 13 patients (65%), ALP normalized: 8 during the first treatment period and 5 during the second. There was a progressive decline and elimination of pagetic bone pain: 70% (14 of 20) of patients reported pagetic bone pain at baseline, 25% (5 of 20) reported pain after the first 196 day period; and 0% at retreatment day 56 (p = 0.003). Thereafter, all patients remained pain-free until the end of the study. No patients withdrew from the study due to adverse events, and no adverse events were judged related to the study drug. In summary, 30 mg/day of oral risedronate given in 3 month course significantly reduced the biochemical indices of disease activity, showing normalization of ALP in the majority of patients with severe Paget's disease, and was associated with a significant reduction in pagetic bone pain. Risedronate was well-tolerated and demonstrated a good safety profile.

Intermittent etidronate therapy to prevent corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Osteoporosis is a recognized complication of corticosteroid therapy. Whether it can be prevented is not known. We conducted a 12-month, randomized, placebo-controlled study of intermittent etidronate (400 mg per day for 14 days) followed by calcium (500 mg per day for 76 days), given for four cycles, in 141 men and women (age, 19 to 87 years) who had recently begun high-dose corticosteroid therapy. The primary outcome measure was the difference in the change in the bone density of the lumbar spine between the groups from base line to week 52. Secondary measures included changes in the bone density of the femoral neck, trochanter, and radius and the rate of new vertebral fractures. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SE) bone density of the lumbar spine and trochanter in the etidronate group increased 0.61 +/- 0.54 and 1.46 +/- 0.67 percent, respectively, as compared with decreases of 3.23 +/- 0.60 and 2.74 +/- 0.66 percent, respectively, in the placebo group. The mean differences between the groups after one year were 3.72 +/- 0.88 percentage points for the lumbar spine (P = 0.02) and 4.14 +/- 0.94 percentage points for the trochanter (P = 0.02). The changes in the femoral neck and the radius were not significantly different between the groups. There was an 85 percent reduction in the proportion of postmenopausal woman with new vertebral fractures in the etidronate group as compared with the placebo group (1 of 31 patients vs. 7 of 32 patients, P = 0.05), and the etidronate-treated postmenopausal women also had significantly fewer vertebral fractures per patient (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent etidronate therapy prevents the loss of vertebral and trochanteric bone in corticosteroid-treated patients.