Characterization of renal glucose reabsorption in response to dapagliflozin in healthy subjects and subjects with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, on the major components of renal glucose reabsorption (decreased maximum renal glucose reabsorptive capacity [TmG], increased splay, and reduced threshold), using the pancreatic/stepped hyperglycemic clamp (SHC) technique. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects with type 2 diabetes (n=12) and matched healthy subjects (n=12) underwent pancreatic/SHC (plasma glucose range 5.5-30.5 mmol/L) at baseline and after 7 days of dapagliflozin treatment. A pharmacodynamic model was developed to describe the major components of renal glucose reabsorption for both groups and then used to estimate these parameters from individual glucose titration curves. RESULTS: At baseline, type 2 diabetic subjects had elevated TmG, splay, and threshold compared with controls. Dapagliflozin treatment reduced the TmG and splay in both groups. However, the most significant effect of dapagliflozin was a reduction of the renal threshold for glucose excretion in type 2 diabetic and control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin improves glycemic control in diabetic patients by reducing the TmG and threshold at which glucose is excreted in the urine.

Effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, in healthy subjects.

AIM: To investigate the effect of co-administration of rifampicin, a potent inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 enzymes, on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin in healthy subjects. Saxagliptin is metabolized by CYP3A4/3A5 to 5-hydroxy saxagliptin, its major pharmacologically active metabolite. METHODS: In a non-randomized, open label, single sequence design, 14 healthy subjects received single oral doses of saxagliptin 5 mg with and without steady-state rifampicin (600 mg once daily for 6 days). PK (saxagliptin and 5-hydroxy saxagliptin) and PD (plasma DPP-4 activity) were measured for up to 24 h on days 1 and 7. RESULTS: Concomitant administration with rifampicin resulted in 53% (point estimate 0.47, 90% CI 0.38, 0.57) and 76% (point estimate 0.24, 90% CI 0.21, 0.27) decreases in the geometric mean C(max) and AUC values of saxagliptin, respectively, with a 39% (point estimate 1.39, 90% CI 1.23, 1.56) increase in the geometric mean C(max) and no change (point estimate 1.03, 90% CI 0.97, 1.09) in the AUC of 5-hydroxy saxagliptin. Similar maximum % inhibition and area under the % inhibition-time effect curve over 24 h for DPP-4 activity were observed when saxagliptin was administered alone or with rifampicin. The saxagliptin total active moieties exposure (AUC) decreased by 27% (point estimate 0.73, 90% CI 0.66, 0.81). Saxagliptin with or without rifampicin in this study was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of change of PD effect of saxagliptin is consistent with the observed 27% reduction in systemic exposure to the total active moieties, which is not considered clinically meaningful. Based on these findings, it is not necessary to adjust the saxagliptin dose when co-administered with rifampicin.