Comparison of mesiodistal tooth crown diameters and arch dimensions between modern Mongolians and Japanese.

The purposes of this study were to establish normative data for mesiodistal tooth crown diameters and arch dimensions in Mongolian adults and to compare them with those of Japanese adults. The study materials comprised dental casts of 100 modern Mongolian and 100 Japanese subjects (50 males, 50 females for each) with Angle Class I normal occlusion. The mean ages were 20 years 8 months for the Mongolian subjects and 20 years 0 months for the Japanese subjects. On the dental casts, the mesiodistal tooth crown diameters (excluding wisdom teeth) and dental arch dimensions were measured. The following arch dimensions were measured: inter-canine lingual, inter-premolar lingual, inter-molar lingual, inter-molar central, coronal arch length, basal arch length, and basal arch width. In the Mongolian samples, significant sex differences were noted, and most of the items were significantly larger in males than in females. Significant differences between the Mongolian and Japanese samples were mainly noted in the premolar and molar regions, rather than in the anterior region, and were significantly smaller in the Mongolian samples. In the Mongolian samples, the molar section widths and basal arch width and length were significantly larger in males and females compared with the Japanese samples. These results suggest that the tooth crown size and arch dimensions in the Mongolian samples differed from those in the Japanese samples, and that establishment of the clinical norm for Mongolian adults might be helpful in formulating treatment plans for Mongolian patients, given that these parameters are the basic tools for diagnosis.

Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture.

The aim of this study was to investigate the influences of repeated bonding, using 2 different orthodontic adhesive systems, on the shear bond strength (SBS) and the enamel surface morphology. Sixty premolars were divided into 2 groups (n = 30), and either Transbond XT (T group) or Fuji Ortho LC (F group) adhesives were used. SBS was measured 24 h after bonding, using a universal testing machine. Then, the enamel surfaces were investigated and the mode of failure was described using adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores. After each debonding, 10 teeth from each group were examined by scanning electron microscopy to determine the penetration of adhesives, the length of resin tags, and the state of the enamel surface. The other teeth were subjected to two more bonding/debonding procedures. In T group, the second debonding sequences had significantly higher bond strengths than the other sequences. The length of resin tags was greatest in the second debonding sequence, although there was no significant difference. In F group, the SBS increased with further rebonding and the failure mode tended towards cohesive failure. In both groups, the ARI scores increased with rebonding. Enamel loss could have occurred with both adhesives, although the surfaces appeared unchanged to the naked eye. From this study, we suggest that enamel damage caused by repeated bonding is of concern. To prevent bond failure, we should pay attention to the adhesion method used for bondable retainers.