Global Oral Health Policies and Guidelines: Using Silver Diamine Fluoride for Caries Control.

Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) was developed in Japan in the 1960s. It is a clear solution containing silver and fluoride ions. Because of its anti-bacterial and remineralizing effect, silver diamine fluoride has been used in managing dental caries for decades worldwide. This paper aims to summarize and discuss the global policies, guidelines, and relevant information on utilizing SDF for caries management. SDF can be used for treating dental caries in most countries. However, it is not permitted to be used in mainland China. Several manufacturers, mainly in Australia, Brazil, India, Japan, and the United States, produce SDF at different concentrations that are commercially available around the world. The prices differ between contents and brands. Different government organizations and dental associations have developed guidelines for clinical use of SDF. Dental professionals can refer to the specific guidelines in their own countries or territories. Training for using SDF is part of undergraduate and/or postgraduate curriculums in almost all countries. However, real utilization of SDF of dentists, especially in the private sector, remains unclear in most places because little research has been conducted. There are at least two ongoing regional-wide large-scale oral health programs, using SDF as one of the components to manage dental caries in young children (one in Hong Kong and one in Mongolia). Because SDF treatment does not require caries removal, and it is simple, non-invasive, and inexpensive, SDF is a valuable strategy for caries management in young children, elderly people, and patients with special needs. In addition, to reduce the risk of bacteria or virus transmission in dental settings, using SDF as a non-aerosol producing procedure should be emphasized under the COVID-19 outbreak.

Inequalities in Caries Experience Among Mongolian Children.

Although inequalities in dental caries have been well-reported, there is only one Mongolian study on the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and caries experience, which was published ten years ago. This study aimed to determine the dental health status of Mongolian children living in urban and suburban areas of Ulaanbaatar city and examine its association with income and parental educational attainment. An oral examination was conducted by dentists and caries were measured as deft/DMFT indices. A questionnaire including demographic characteristics and socioeconomic status was completed by their parents or caregiver. Parental educational attainment and household income were used as the measures of SES. The relative index of inequality (RII) and slope index of inequality (SII) were employed to examine the association between SES on deft and DMFT after adjusting for covariates. Dental caries prevalence (those with deft/DMFT > 0) was 89.3% among the total number of participants. The mean deft/DMFT values for age groups 1-6, 7-12, and 13-18 were 5.83 (SD = 4.37, deft), 5.77 (SD = 3.31, deft/DMFT), and 3.59 (SD = 2.69, DMFT), respectively. Rather than residence area and parental educational attainment, significant caries experience inequality was observed in relation to income (RII 0.65 95%, CI 0.52 to 0.82, SII -2.30, 95% CI -4.16 to -0.45). A prevention strategy for lower socioeconomic groups and building integrated oral health surveillance to monitor epidemiological trends for further evaluation of its progress is necessary.

Are social inequalities in influenza vaccination coverage in Japan reduced by health policy?

Influenza vaccination is effective to prevent influenza infection. However, findings about association between socioeconomic status and influenza vaccination coverage are controversial. Online survey was conducted among 4995 participants between 20 and 69 years of age throughout Japan, January 2017. We asked about history of receiving vaccination in previous year and socioeconomic status, with their reasons for having vaccination or not. Age stratified multivariable logistic regression model was conducted to estimate the odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of receiving vaccine for each educational level and income. Sex, self-reported health status, marital status and income were included as covariates. The rate for receiving influenza vaccine among ≤64 year-olds and ≥65 year-olds was 32.9% and 35.4%, respectively. Among younger adults, vaccination varied by each education: junior high school, 23.6%; senior high school, 27.2%; college, 32.6%; university, 36.2%; and graduate school, 39.8%. Compared to junior high school, those from graduate school tended to be more vaccinated (OR1.88, 95%CI 1.07-3.24). On the contrary, those aged above ≥65 years old received vaccination with no significant differences across education. Likewise, among respondents aged ≤64 year-olds, income was significantly associated with influenza vaccination. Despite being "Managed by school or company" (32.5%), having "No particular reason" was the frequent reason for both receiving influenza vaccination (23.8%) or not (34.3%). Adults with higher educational level were significantly more likely to receive vaccination. Subsidizing influenza vaccination may reduce inequality in receiving vaccination for adults. Strengthening vaccination through various approaches is necessary, such as managing by school or company.

Transnational collaboration for faculty development in health professions education in Mongolia.

PURPOSE: The Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences is the only national university in Mongolia and has produced more than 90% of health professionals in the country. Experts from Mongolia and Korea embarked on a collaborative effort to develop educational programs for faculty development based on the personal and professional needs of faculty members. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of those educational programs to determine whether this transnational collaboration was successful. METHODS: A needs assessment survey was conducted among 325 faculty members. Based on the results of this survey, the joint expert team developed educational programs on seven core topics: clinical teaching, curriculum development, e-learning, item writing, medical research, organizational culture, and resident selection. Surveys evaluating the satisfaction and the attitudes of the participants were conducted for each program. RESULTS: Throughout the 17-day program, 16 experts from Korea and 14 faculty members from Mongolia participated as instructors, and a total of 309 participants attended the program. The average satisfaction score was 7.15 out of 8.0, and the attitudes of the participants towards relevant competencies significantly improved after each educational program. CONCLUSION: The faculty development programs that were developed and implemented as part of this transnational collaboration between Mongolia and Korea are expected to contribute to the further improvement of health professions education in Mongolia. Future studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of these educational programs.