The difference in the upper trapezius deep fascia slides between individuals with and without myofascial pain syndrome: A case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: MPS is a chronic disorder caused by myofascial trigger points, leading to pain and limited neck movements due to impacted fascia. Studies have reported reduced fascia slides in chronic low back pain, but limited fascia slides in MPS patients are still unreported. AIM: We determined differences in upper trapezius' deep fascia slides between MPS and non-MPS participants. METHODS: Between January-August 2019, participants from diverse work sectors were recruited in Manila. An expert physiotherapist diagnosed MPS, while non-MPS participants performed full painless cervical movements. Participants underwent upper trapezius deep fascia scans on both shoulders while performing six cervical movements. An HS1 Konica Minolta ultrasound recorded the data. Two blinded physiotherapists used Tracker 5.0 © 2018 to analyze videos and quantify deep fascia slides by measuring the distance between two x-axis points. The Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) assessed deep fascia slide differences in six active cervical movements. Pillai's Trace, with a range of 0-1 and a p-value of <0.05, was set. Effect sizes in individuals with and without MPS were calculated using Hedges' g and Cohen's d. RESULTS: Of the 327 participants (136 non-MPS, 191 MPS), 101 MPS participants had shoulder pain for <1 year and 103 experienced unilateral pain. The study examined 3800 ultrasound videos but found no significant difference in deep fascia slides across cervical movements between MPS and non-MPS groups (Pillai's Trace = 0.004, p = 0.94). Minor differences in deep fascia displacement were observed, with small effect sizes (g = 0.02-0.08). CONCLUSION: A limited deep fascia slide does not characterize MPS participants from non-MPS participants.

Students' perceptions and experiences of an online well-being programme: a phenomenological study protocol.

BACKGROUND: The pandemic has ensued challenges across all sections of the human population such as livelihood and educational changes, which involve the abrupt shift to online learning, immensely affecting the students' well-being. Negative health consequences of e-learning among students stem from the increased demand for new technological skills, productivity, information overload and restriction of students to spend time with their peers. OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences of the students from the University of Santo Tomas-College of Rehabilitation Sciences (UST-CRS) who participated in the online well-being programme. METHODOLOGY: A phenomenological design will be used to determine the participants' perceptions and experiences. Purposive sampling will be used to recruit 8-10 undergraduate students from UST-CRS ages 18-22 years, who participated in the well-being programme, and completed the study's quantitative counterpart. Semistructured, in-depth questions will be used to conduct a focus group discussion. The transcripts will be analysed using thematic analysis via the NVivo V.12 software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol is approved by the UST-CRS Ethical Review Committee (Protocol Number: SI-2022-034 (V.4)). It will be implemented in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the National Ethical Guidelines for Health and Health-Related Research, and Data Privacy Act. Findings will be published in accredited journals and presented in related scientific fora. REGISTRATION ID: PHRR230214-005419; Philippine Health Research Registry.