Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int Ophthalmol ; 38(6): 2709-2714, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29090356

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during vitrectomy for nontractional diabetic macular edema. METHODS: PUBMED, MEDLINE and CENTRAL were reviewed using the following terms (or combination of terms): diabetic macular edema, nontractional diabetic macular edema, internal limiting membrane peeling, vitrectomy, Müller cells. Randomized and nonrandomized studies were included. The eligible studies compared anatomical and functional outcomes of vitrectomy with or without ILM peeling for tractional and nontractional diabetic macular edema. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness were considered, respectively, the primary and secondary outcomes. Meta-analysis on mean differences between vitrectomy with and without ILM peeling was performed using inverse variance method in random effects. RESULTS: Four studies with 672 patients were eligible for analysis. No significant difference was found between postoperative best-corrected visual acuity or best-corrected visual acuity change of ILM peeling group compared with nonpeeling group. There was no significant difference in postoperative central macular thickness and central macular thickness reduction between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The visual acuity outcomes in patients affected by nontractional diabetic macular edema using pars plana vitrectomy with ILM peeling versus no ILM peeling were not significantly different. A larger prospective and randomized study would be necessary.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy/surgery , Epiretinal Membrane/surgery , Macular Edema/surgery , Vitrectomy/methods , Basement Membrane/surgery , Humans , Visual Acuity
2.
Physiol Res ; 66(2): 325-333, 2017 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27982689

ABSTRACT

Fat-enriched diet is strongly associated with cataract development. Laurus nobilis shows antioxidant activity. Herein we evaluated the effect of Laurus nobilis oral administration on the blood and lenses antioxidant activity in rabbits under fat-enriched diet. Sixty rabbits divided into 4 groups were used. One group represented the control (N-CTR). The second group (P-CTR) fed a diet supplemented with 2.5 % of pig fat; the third group (EXP1) received a diet supplemented with 2.5 % of pig fat and 1 g/kg of dried-bay leaves; the fourth group (EXP2) was treated with dried-bay leaves at the rate of 1 g/kg of feed. At baseline and at the end of the study (56 days) the following blood parameters were determined: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), reactive oxygen metabolites (ROMs), total phenols, superoxide dismutase (SOD), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC(pca)), ferric ion reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), retinol and alfa-tocopherol. At the end of the follow-up, the eyes were enucleated and the antioxidant profile, such as total antioxidant activity (TAC), TBARS, retinol and alfa-tocopherol of lenses was evaluated. Plasma ROMs and TBARS levels were statistically lower in the groups receiving bay leaves integration. A significant increase of plasma retinol, FRAP and ORAC(pca) levels was found in EXP1 and EXP2 groups, whereas plasma alfa-tocopherol resulted statistically higher only in EXP2 group. Bay leaves supplementation enhanced TAC, retinol and alfa-tocopherol in rabbit lens, particularly in EXP2 group; whereas lenses TBARS levels significantly decreased in both treated groups. These findings demonstrate that Laurus nobilis oral administration exerts a protective effect on the risk of cataract development in rabbits under fat-enriched diet.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/metabolism , Diet, High-Fat/methods , Dietary Fats/metabolism , Dietary Supplements , Laurus , Lens, Crystalline/metabolism , Phytotherapy/methods , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Male , Rabbits
3.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 255(3): 529-539, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27680013

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To demonstrate the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) in combination with reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy (RF-PDT) in patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathologic myopia. METHODS: Sixty patients affected by myopic CNV (mCNV) were randomized to receive either ranibizumab 0.5 mg monotherapy (RM; n = 20), standard fluence PDT (SF-PDT, n = 20) or RF-PDT combination therapy (n = 20). Subsequently, IVR was injected as needed. All patients were evaluated for 48 weeks. RESULTS: Mean BCVA change at 48 weeks was + 0.2 and +15 letters with SF or RFPDT plus ranibizumab, respectively, compared with +16.8 letters with RM. At 48 weeks, mean central foveal thickness (CFT) decrease from baseline was 58 ± 15 µm, 91.4 ± 43.8 µm, and 85 ± 41.5 µm for the verteporfin SF, RF and RM groups, respectively. Macular sensitivity improvement was + 0.4 db, + 1.9 dB and + 2.7 dB for the verteporfin SF, RF and RM groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with RF-PDT improved BCVA and macular sensitivity in patients affected by mCNV, whereas CFT results were reduced. SF-PDT combination regimen mostly stabilized vision at 48 weeks. Among all groups, the RF-PDT seemed to reduce the number of ranibizumab retreatments.


Subject(s)
Choroidal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Myopia, Degenerative/drug therapy , Photochemotherapy/methods , Porphyrins/therapeutic use , Ranibizumab/administration & dosage , Visual Acuity , Adult , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Choroid/pathology , Choroidal Neovascularization/diagnosis , Choroidal Neovascularization/etiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Fluorescein Angiography , Follow-Up Studies , Fundus Oculi , Humans , Male , Myopia, Degenerative/complications , Myopia, Degenerative/diagnosis , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Refraction, Ocular , Time Factors , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment Outcome , Verteporfin , Visual Fields
4.
Curr Drug Targets ; 12(2): 182-9, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20887244

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a condition that accounts for 75% of cases of legal blindness in individuals over the age of 50. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review has been to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of available combined treatments modalities in the treatment of neovascular AMD. DATA SOURCES: Central and Medline were searched for original research studies (Phase I, II, III), abstracts, and review articles concerning combination therapies for the control of neovascular AMD. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS: The results of therapeutic trials focused on the actual options in the management of neovascular AMD are discussed. Intravitreal treatment with substances targeting all isotypes of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) results in a significant increase in visual acuity in patients with neovascular AMD. The combination with occlusive therapies like verteporfin photodynamic therapy (V-PDT) potentially offers a reduction of re-treatment frequency rate and long-term maintenance of the benefit reached. Despite the promise from combining anti-VEGF therapies with V-PDT, other combinations to improve outcomes with V-PDT deserve attention. Corticosteroids demonstrated an antiangiogenic effect and targeted the extravascular components of CNV, such as inflammatory cells and fibrocytes. Nevertheless, the study on the clinical application of corticosteroids will require a better understanding of the potential complications. Further developments interacting with various steps in the angiogenic cascade are under clinical or preclinical evaluation and may soon become available. In AMD the goal of a combination regimen is to address the therapy toward neovascular, inflammatory, and proliferative components of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatments strategies are an obvious step providing disease control when it is not achieved with a single therapeutic approach. One risk of using a single therapy to control AMD is a rebound induced by compensatory stimulation of other pathogenetic pathways. Combination therapy is a logical approach to address mechanisms of disease progression that appear to be self-sustaining once initiated.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Macular Degeneration/drug therapy , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/pharmacology , Animals , Blindness/etiology , Blindness/prevention & control , Choroidal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Choroidal Neovascularization/etiology , Choroidal Neovascularization/prevention & control , Combined Modality Therapy/trends , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Humans , Macular Degeneration/physiopathology , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Porphyrins/pharmacology , Porphyrins/therapeutic use , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors/antagonists & inhibitors , Verteporfin , Wet Macular Degeneration/drug therapy , Wet Macular Degeneration/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...