Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phlebology ; 34(1): 52-57, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29690838

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usefulness of a negative D-dimer in peripheral or central venous blood to screen for asymptomatic catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients. METHODS: D-dimer was measured in blood from central venous catheter and peripheral venous samples in 48 patients with cancer. Asymptomatic catheter-related thrombosis was identified via Doppler ultrasound. Bland and Altman's limits of agreement analysis was used to compare sample sites. Sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer was calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 33 of the central samples and 32 of the peripheral samples had D-dimer levels below the cutoff (≥0.3 mg/l). Mean central D-dimer was 0.31 ± 0.35 mg/l; peripheral 0.24 ± 0.22 mg/l (p = 0.5). Bland-Altman plot showed that the two sample sites were not equivalent. Catheter-related thrombosis was demonstrated in five patients, and there were three false negatives. Peripheral D-dimer had a negative predictive value of 90.9%. CONCLUSIONS: A negative D-dimer may be useful for screening asymptomatic catheter-related thrombosis in patients with cancer, but the central and peripheral sample sites are not equivalent.


Subject(s)
Catheters/adverse effects , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Neoplasms/blood , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Thrombosis/blood , Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/therapy , Thrombosis/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...