ABT-335, the choline salt of fenofibric acid, does not have a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction with rosuvastatin in humans.

ABT-335 is the choline salt of fenofibric acid under clinical development as a combination therapy with rosuvastatin for the management of dyslipidemia. ABT-335 and rosuvastatin have different mechanisms of actions and exert complementary pharmacodynamic effects on lipids. The current study assessed the pharmacokinetic interaction between the 2 drugs following a multiple-dose, open-label, 3-period, randomized, crossover design. Eighteen healthy men and women received 40 mg rosuvastatin alone, 135 mg ABT-335 alone, and the 2 drugs in combination once daily for 10 days. Blood samples were collected prior to dosing on multiple days and up to 120 hours after day 10 dosing for the measurements of fenofibric acid and rosuvastatin plasma concentrations. Coadministering 40 mg rosuvastatin had no significant effect on the steady-state Cmax, Cmin, or AUC24 of fenofibric acid (P > .05). Coadministering ABT-335 had no significant effect on the steady-state Cmin or AUC24 of rosuvastatin (P > .05) but increased Cmax by 20% (90% confidence interval: 12%-28%). All 3 regimens were generally well tolerated with no clinically significant changes in clinical laboratory values, vital signs, or electrocardiograms during the study. Results from this study demonstrate no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction between ABT-335 at the full clinical dose and rosuvastatin at the highest approved dose.

Effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of paricalcitol in healthy subjects.

Paricalcitol capsules are indicated for the prevention and treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Proton pump inhibitors are prescribed to CKD patients to treat gastroesophageal reflux. This was a single dose, crossover study evaluating the effect of omeprazole, change in gastric pH as a result thereof, on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of paricalcitol. Twenty-six healthy subjects were administered paricalcitol capsules (16 microg) alone (regimen A), and following a single dose of OMP (40 mg) (regimen B), with a washout of at least 7 days. Plasma samples for paricalcitol concentrations were collected for 48 h post-paricalcitol dose. The plasma paricalcitol concentrations were measured using an LC-MS/MS assay (LOQ=0.02 ng/ml) and paricalcitol pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental methods. The point estimates and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUC0-infinity to evaluate paricalcitol-omeprazole interaction were 1.032 [0.920-1.158] and 1.041 [0.951-1.139], respectively. No significant differences in Tmax (regimen A: 2.9 h vs regimen B: 2.6 h) or t1/2 (6.83 h vs 6.6 h) between the regimens were observed. Hence, the co-administration of omeprazole does not affect the PK of paricalcitol. Both regimens were well tolerated and no apparent differences among the regimens with respect to safety were observed.

Evaluation of the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between fenofibrate and ezetimibe: A phase I, open-label, multiple-dose, three-period crossover study in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between fenofibrate and ezetimibe in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was a Phase I, open-label, multiple-dose,3-period crossover study conducted in healthy adult men and women. Subjects received fenofibrate 145 mg alone, fenofibrate 145 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg, and ezetimibe 10 mg alone for 10 consecutive days, in an order determined by computerized randomization schedule. Blood samples were collected for up to 24 hours after dosing on study day 1 and up to 120 hours after dosing on study day 10 for determination of plasma concentrations of fenofibric acid, unconjugated (free) ezetimibe, and total (conjugated and unconjugated) ezetimibe using validated high-performance liquid chromatography methods with mass-spectrometric detection. Ezetimibe glucuronide concentrations were estimated by subtracting free ezetimibe concentrations from total ezetimibe concentrations. RESULTS: Eighteen healthy adults (12 men, 6 women; 17 white, 1 black) were enrolled in the study. Their mean age was 43.4 years (range, 27-55 years), their mean weight 78.7 kg (range, 60-98 kg), and their mean height 174.9 cm (range, 156-194 cm). Coadministration of multiple doses of fenofibrate and ezetimibe produced no statistically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of fenofibric acid but significantly increased exposures to total ezetimibe and ezetimibe glucuronide (P < 0.05). Using point estimates, co-administration of fenofibrate and ezetimibe increased AUC central values for total ezetimibe and ezetimibe glucuronide by 43% (90% CI, 29-59) and 49% (90% CI, 34-65), respectively. CONCLUSION: In these healthy volunteers, coadministration of multiple doses of fenofibrate and ezetimibe had no statistically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of fenofibric acid but was associated with a significant increase in exposure to total ezetimibe and its metabolite ezetimibe glucuronide.

The effects of multiple doses of fenofibrate on the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin and its 3alpha-hydroxy isomeric metabolite.

Published data indicate that coadministration of multiple doses of the fibrate drug, gemfibrozil, led to a 202% increase in pravastatin systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve, AUC). To evaluate the effects of another fibrate drug, fenofibrate, on the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin, 24 healthy subjects took pravastatin (40 mg once daily) on study days 1 to 15 and fenofibrate (160 mg once daily) on study days 6 to 15. Blood samples were collected for 24 hours after dosing on days 5, 6, and 15. Plasma concentrations of pravastatin and its active metabolite, 3alpha-hydroxy-iso-pravastatin, were measured, and pharmacokinetics was assessed. Safety assessments were based on adverse events, physical examinations, electrocardiogram results, vital signs, and clinical laboratory testing. Safety results were unremarkable. Coadministration of fenofibrate had modest effects on pravastatin and 3alpha-hydroxy-iso-pravastatin systemic exposures (AUC). Increases in pravastatin systemic exposures (19%-28%, on average) and 3alpha-hydroxy-iso-pravastatin systemic exposures (24%-39%, on average) were observed upon coadministration, but individual changes were variable. Pravastatin and 3alpha-hydroxy-iso-pravastatin systemic exposures were not statistically significantly different following the 1st and 10th doses of fenofibrate.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of ABT-578, a Sirolimus (Rapamycin) Analogue, after Single Intravenous Bolus Injection in Healthy Male Volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: ABT-578, a tetrazole analogue of sirolimus (rapamycin), possesses anti-restenosis activity. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of escalating single intravenous (IV) doses of ABT-578 in a phase 1, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study. METHODS: Sixty adult healthy males were divided into five IV-dose groups of 100, 300, 500, 700 and 900mug. Doses were administered as IV bolus over 3 minutes, with eight subjects and four subjects receiving ABT-578 and placebo, respectively, in each dose group. Higher doses were administered after evaluating safety from the preceding lower doses. Blood concentrations of ABT-578 were sampled for 168 hours and measured using LC-MS/MS with a limit of quantification of 0.20 ng/mL. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of ABT-578 were essentially linear across the 100-900microg dose range as illustrated by the dose-proportional increases in concentration at 5 minutes (C(5)) after the end of infusion and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). The mean half-life ranged between 26.0 and 40.2h over the studied doses and was not significantly different over the 300-900mug dose range. The mean clearance values ranged from 2.90 to 3.55 L/h. Single IV bolus doses up to 900mug of ABT-578 were well tolerated and no clinically significant changes in physical examination results, vital signs or laboratory test results were observed. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the pharmacokinetics of IV ABT-578 are dose-proportional over the 100-900mug dose range. Single IV bolus doses up to 900mug were well tolerated in healthy male subjects.