Consensus Competencies for Postgraduate Fellowship Training in Global Neurology.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Use a modified Delphi approach to develop competencies for neurologists completing ≥1 year of advanced global neurology training. METHODS: An expert panel of 19 United States-based neurologists involved in global health was recruited from the American Academy of Neurology Global Health Section and the American Neurological Association International Outreach Committee. An extensive list of global health competencies was generated from review of global health curricula and adapted for global neurology training. Using a modified Delphi method, United States-based neurologists participated in 3 rounds of voting on a survey with potential competencies rated on a 4-point Likert scale. A final group discussion was held to reach consensus. Proposed competencies were then subjected to a formal review from a group of 7 neurologists from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with experience working with neurology trainees from high-income countries (HICs) who commented on potential gaps, feasibility, and local implementation challenges of the proposed competencies. This feedback was used to modify and finalize competencies. RESULTS: Three rounds of surveys, a conference call with United States-based experts, and a semistructured questionnaire and focus group discussion with LMIC experts were used to discuss and reach consensus on the final competencies. This resulted in a competency framework consisting of 47 competencies across 8 domains: (1) cultural context, social determinants of health and access to care; (2) clinical and teaching skills and neurologic medical knowledge; (3) team-based practice; (4) developing global neurology partnerships; (5) ethics; (6) approach to clinical care; (7) community neurologic health; (8) health care systems and multinational health care organizations. DISCUSSION: These proposed competencies can serve as a foundation on which future global neurology training programs can be built and trainees evaluated. It may also serve as a model for global health training programs in other medical specialties as well as a framework to expand the number of neurologists from HICs trained in global neurology.

Biological Sex Differences in Risk Factors and Outcomes Among Hospitalized Adults With Stroke in Lusaka, Zambia.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated sex differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes among hospitalized adults with stroke in Zambia. METHODS: We retrospectively collected information for 324 consecutively hospitalized adults with stroke on the neurology service at the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia, between October 2018 and March 2019. Stroke characteristics were then compared by biological sex. RESULTS: Female participants constituted 62% (n = 200) of the cohort, were older (61 ± 19 vs 57 ± 16 years, p = 0.06), had fewer hemorrhagic stroke than male participants (22% vs 37%, p = 0.001), and had higher rates of hypertension (84% vs 74%, p = 0.04), diabetes (19% vs 13%, p = 0.04), heart disease (38% vs 27%, p = 0.04), and history of stroke (26% vs 14%, p = 0.01). Male participants had higher rates of alcohol (33% vs 4%, p < 0.001) and tobacco (19% vs 2%, p < 0.001) use. Female participants were less likely to have neuroimaging completed during their hospitalization (82% vs 94%, p = 0.002) and had higher 90 days postdischarge mortality (28% vs 10%, p = 0.002) independent of age and stroke subtype (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.1-5.58, p = 0.03). DISCUSSION: Female participants in this Zambian stroke cohort had a higher prevalence of vascular risk factors but were less likely to have neuroimaging completed. Postdischarge mortality was markedly higher among female participants even after adjusting for age and stroke subtype. Our data highlight the need for future studies of social and socioeconomic factors that may influence stroke-related outcomes.

Clinical Reasoning: Rapidly Progressive Dementia in a Man With HIV Infection and Undetectable Plasma Viral Load.

Neurocognitive decline associated with HIV infection remains prevalent even in the antiretroviral therapy (ART) era, albeit usually in less severe forms. The differential diagnosis of cognitive impairment in this population is quite broad, including infectious causes such as CNS opportunistic infections, causes directly related to HIV such as HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders, and causes entirely unrelated to HIV infection such as primary dementia syndromes. In this case report, a 47-year-old man with HIV on ART with an undetectable plasma viral load presented with rapidly progressive dementia to a clinic in Zambia. He had been functioning independently and fully employed before symptom onset but had to stop working within 2 months of symptom onset because of the severity and rapidity of his cognitive decline. Initial workup led to an empiric diagnosis and initiation of an empiric treatment regimen, which was ultimately ineffective. This prompted re-evaluation, additional workup, and, ultimately, discovering the correct diagnosis. This case highlights the stepwise approach to developing a diagnosis in a resource-limited setting where there exists a high burden of HIV infection, including the necessity of empiric diagnoses of treatment plans when investigations are limited and the importance of reconsidering these diagnoses in the face of additional clinical information. In addition, it highlights both infectious and noninfectious causes of cognitive decline in people with HIV.