Analysis of 10-year income trends for pharmacists and other select health professionals.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: To evaluate income trends among pharmacists and other select health professions (dentists, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, and physicians) in the US for the 10-year period of 2012 to 2021, with special attention given to the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020 and 2021). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 2012 to 2021 income data for select health professions, collected from the American Community Survey. Univariate time series analysis was conducted using exponential smoothing to examine income patterns over the 10-year study period and forecast income for the next 5-year period (2022 to 2026) for each health profession. Additionally, time series regression models were constructed for each health profession. Descriptive statistics (mean percent change in income and SD) were calculated for each health profession for the prepandemic era (2012 to 2019) and the first 2 years of the pandemic (2020 and 2021). RESULTS: Goodness-of-fit statistics for each forecast model indicate highly accurate forecasts. The model for each health profession indicates a significant positive trajectory in income (P < 0.001), although pharmacists are projected to have a lower rate of income growth among the 5 health professions for the next 5-year period, 2022 to 2026. During the first 2 years of the pandemic, pharmacists had the lowest mean percent change in income (mean, 2.0%; SD, 2.0%) among the 5 health professions. CONCLUSION: Growth in pharmacist income is projected to lag behind that in other health professions in the near future. Individual-, organization-, and profession-level strategies may facilitate opportunities for income growth among pharmacists.

Effects of Medicare Part D medication therapy management on racial/ethnic disparities in adherence to antidementia medications among patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: An observational study.

Background: Evidence is sparse on the effects of Medicare medication therapy management (MTM) on racial/ethnic disparities in medication adherence among patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Objectives: This study examined the Medicare MTM program's effects on racial/ethnic disparities in the adherence to antidementia medications among patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 100% of 2010-2017 Medicare Parts A, B, and D data linked to Area Health Resources Files. The study outcome was nonadherence to antidementia medications, and intervention was defined as new MTM enrollment in 2017. Propensity score matching was conducted to create intervention and comparison groups with comparable characteristics. A difference-in-differences model was employed with logistic regression, including interaction terms of dummy variables for the intervention group and racial/ethnic minorities. Results: Unadjusted comparisons revealed that Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients were more likely to be nonadherent than non-Hispanic White (White) patients in 2016. Differences in odds of nonadherence between Black and White patients among the intervention group were lower in 2017 than in 2016 by 27% (odds ratios [OR]: 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.82). A similar lowering was seen between Hispanic and White patients by 26% (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63-0.87). MTM enrollment was associated with reduced disparities in nonadherence for Black-White patients of 33% (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57-0.78) and Hispanic-White patients of 19% (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.67-0.99). Discussion: The Medicare MTM program was associated with lower disparities in adherence to antidementia medications between Black and White patients, and between Hispanic and White patients in the population with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Conclusions: Expanding the MTM program may particularly benefit racial/ethnic minorities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia care.

Racial and ethnic disparities in the enrolment of medicare medication therapy management programs.

Objectives: Racial/ethnic disparities have been found in prior literature examining enrolment in Medicare medication therapy management programs. However, those studies were based on various eligibility scenarios because enrolment data were unavailable. This study tested for potential disparities in enrolment using actual MTM enrolment data. Methods: Medicare Parts A&B claims, Medication Therapy Management Data Files, and the Area Health Resources File from 2013 to 2014 and 2016 to 2017 were analysed in this retrospective analysis. An adjusted logistic regression compared odds of enrolment between racial/ethnic minorities and non-Hispanic Whites (Whites) in the total sample and subpopulations with diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidaemia. Trends in disparities were analysed by including interaction terms in regressions between dummy variables for race/ethnic minority groups and period 2016-2017. Key Findings: Disparities in MTM enrolment were detected between Blacks and Whites with diabetes in 2013-2014 (Odds Ratio = 0.78, 95% Confidence Interval = 0.75-0.81). This disparity improved from 2013-2014 to 2016-2017 for Blacks (Odds Ratio=1.08, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.04-1.11) but persisted in 2016-2017 (Odds Ratio = 0.84, 95% Confidence Interval = 0.81-0.87). A disparity was identified between Blacks and Whites with hypertension in 2013-2014 (Odds Ratio = 0.92, 95% Confidence Interval = 0.89-0.95) but not in 2016-2017. Enrolment for all groups, however, declined between periods. For example, in the total sample, the odds of enrolment declined from 2013-2014 to 2016-2017 by 22% (Odds Ratio=0.78, 95% Confidence Interval=0.75-0.81). Conclusions: Racial disparities in MTM enrolment were found between Blacks and Whites among Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes in both periods and among individuals with hypertension in 2013-2014. As overall enrolment fell between periods, concerns about program enrolment remain.

Solving racial/ethnic disparities associated with Medicare Part D Star Ratings.

OBJECTIVE: Medicare Part D Star Ratings are instrumental in shaping healthcare quality improvement efforts. However, the calculation metrics for medication performance measures for this program have been associated with racial/ethnic disparities. In this study, we aimed to explore whether an alternative program, named Star Plus by us that included all medication performance measures developed by Pharmacy Quality Alliance and applicable to our study population, would reduce such disparities among Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes, hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia. METHOD: We conducted an analysis of a 10% random sample of Medicare A/B/D claims linked to the Area Health Resources File. Multivariate logistic regressions with minority dummy variables were used to examine racial/ethnic disparities in measure calculations of Star Ratings and Star Plus, respectively. RESULTS: Adjusted results indicated that relative to non-Hispanic Whites (Whites), racial/ethnic minorities had significantly lower odds of being included in the Star Ratings measure calculations: the odds ratios (ORs) for Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Others were 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66-0.71), 0.73 (CI = 0.69-0.78), 0.88 (CI = 0.82-0.93), and 0.92 (CI = 0.88-0.97), respectively. In contrast, every beneficiary in the sample was included in Star Plus. Further, racial/ethnic minorities had significantly higher increase in the odds of being included in measure calculation in Star Plus than Star Ratings. The ORs for Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Others were 1.47 (CI = 1.41-1.52), 1.37 (CI = 1.29-1.45), 1.14 (CI = 1.07-1.22), and 1.09 (CI = 1.03-1.14), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that racial/ethnic disparities may be eliminated by including additional medication performance measures to Star Ratings.

Racial and ethnic disparities in Medicare Part D medication therapy management services utilization.

Background: The Medicare Part D medication therapy management (MTM) program has positive effects on medication and health service utilization. However, little is known about its utilization, much less so about the use among racial and ethnic minorities. Objective: To examine MTM service utilization among older Medicare beneficiaries and to identify any racial and ethnic disparity patterns. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 2017 Medicare administrative data, linked to the Area Health Resources Files. Fourteen outcomes related to MTM service nature, initiation, quantity, and delivery were examined using logistic, negative binomial, and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: Racial and ethnic disparities were found with varying patterns across outcomes. For example, compared with White patients, the odds of opting out of MTM were 8% higher for Black patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.14), 57% higher for Hispanic patients (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.42-1.72), and 57% higher for Asian patients (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.33-1.85). The odds of continuing MTM from the previous years were 12% lower for Black patients (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.86-0.90) and 3% lower for other patients (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99). In addition, the probability of being offered a comprehensive medication review (CMR) after MTM enrollment was 9% lower for Hispanic patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85-0.97), 9% lower for Asian patients (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.87-0.94), and 3% lower for other patients (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99). Hispanic and Asian patients were more likely to have someone other than themselves receive a CMR. Conclusions: Racial and ethnic disparities in MTM service utilization were identified. Although the disparities in specific utilization outcomes vary across racial/ethnic groups, it is evident that these disparities exist and may result in vulnerable communities not fully benefiting from the MTM services. Causes of the disparities should be explored to inform future reform of the Medicare Part D MTM program.

Cost-Effectiveness of Medication Therapy Management Program Across Racial and Ethnic Groups Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVES: Equity and effectiveness of the medication therapy management (MTM) program in Medicare has been a policy focus since its inception. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Medicare MTM program in improving medication utilization quality across racial and ethnic groups. METHODS: This study analyzed 2017 Medicare data linked to the Area Health Recourses File. A propensity score was used to match MTM enrollees and nonenrollees, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between the 2 groups was calculated. Effectiveness was measured as the proportion of appropriate medication utilization based on medication utilization measures developed by Pharmacy Quality Alliance. Net monetary benefits were compared across racial and ethnic groups at various societal willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. The 95% confidence intervals were obtained by nonparametric bootstrapping. RESULTS: MTM dominated non-MTM among the total sample (N = 699 992), as MTM enrollees had lower healthcare costs ($31 135.89 vs $32 696.69) and higher proportions of appropriate medication utilization (87.47% vs 85.31%) than nonenrollees. MTM enrollees had both lower medication costs ($10 681.21 vs $11 003.08) and medical costs ($20 454.68 vs $21 693.61) compared with nonenrollees. The cost-effectiveness of MTM was higher among Black patients than White patients across the WTP thresholds. For instance, at a WTP of $3006 per percentage point increase in effectiveness, the net monetary benefit for Black patients was greater than White patients by $2334.57 (95% confidence interval $1606.53-$3028.85). CONCLUSIONS: MTM is cost-effective in improving medication utilization quality among Medicare beneficiaries and can potentially reduce disparities between Black and White patients. Expansion of the current MTM program could maximize these benefits.

A diversity index to measure underrepresented minority enrollment in United States colleges and schools of pharmacy.

INTRODUCTION: With an underrepresented minority (URM) student population of <20%, colleges and schools of pharmacy (CoPs) in the United States (US) lag behind the national population, in which URMs account for >30%. Few tools are available to assist the >140 US CoPs in tracking progress in URM diversity among student pharmacists. Thus, the study's purpose was to address this gap by: (1) creating a "diversity index" for pharmacy programs; and (2) determining changes in diversity index scores between 2011 and 2020. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of 2011-2020 fall URM enrollment data for CoPs and national and state population data. The annual diversity index score for 2011-2020 was calculated for each CoP. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted. RESULTS: Among all CoPs, median URM percent enrollment significantly increased from 7.7% in 2011 to 14.5% in 2020. Median diversity index scores for all CoPs increased from 0.66 in 2011 to 0.76 in 2020, but this change was not statistically significant. Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) had significantly greater diversity index scores than non-HBCUs/HSIs. Diversity index scores of public vs. private colleges did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: This diversity index represents an important step in tracking progress in increasing URM student pharmacist representation in CoPs. The index may be utilized as a tool to support development of diversity best practices and more inclusive environments for student pharmacists, faculty, staff, and stakeholders.

Racial/ethnic disparities in the enrollment of Medication Therapy Management programs among Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.

OBJECTIVE: Previous analysis of policy scenarios reported potential disparities in eligibility in the Medicare Medication Therapy Management (MTM) program. With recently released MTM data, this study aimed to determine if racial/ethnic disparities exist in MTM enrollment among Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). METHODS: Medicare claims/records (from 2013-2014 and 2016-2017) linked to the Area Health Resources File were examined. Included individuals were patients with ADRD and diabetes, hypertension or hyperlipidemia. The proportions of MTM enrollment were compared between non-Hispanic White (White) patients and racial/ethnic minority groups in descriptive analysis. Racial/ethnic disparities were then examined using a logistic regression adjusting for patient and community characteristics. Disparities across study periods were compared by estimating a logistic regression model with interaction terms between dummy variables for each racial/ethnic minority group and 2016-2017. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, minorities had higher enrollment proportions than Whites. In 2016-2017, for example, enrollment percentages for Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Asian/Pacific Islanders (Asians) and Others were respectively 14.44%, 16.71%, 19.83%, 16.66%, and 17.78%. In adjusted analyses, Blacks had lower enrollment odds than Whites within all cohorts. In the entire study sample in 2016-2017, for example, Blacks with ADRD had 9% lower odds of MTM enrollment (odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86-0.97) than Whites. These disparities decreased over time among the ADRD sample and all sub-groups. The interaction term between Blacks and 2016-2017, for instance, indicated that disparities were lowered by 11% (odds ratio 1.11, 95% CI = 1.05-1.16) across study periods among those with ADRD. CONCLUSIONS: Blacks with ADRD, and diabetes, hypertension or hyperlipidemia have lower likelihood of MTM enrollment than Whites. Racial disparities were reduced over time but not eliminated.

The Lean Six Sigma Define, Measure, Analyze, Implement, Control (LSS DMAIC) Framework: An Innovative Strategy for Quality Improvement of Pharmacist Vaccine Recommendations in Community Pharmacy.

Community pharmacies represent a highly accessible and convenient setting for vaccination. However, setting-specific barriers exist which contribute to suboptimal vaccination rates, particularly for pneumococcal vaccinations. One proven quality improvement framework growing in use within healthcare settings is Lean Six Sigma (LSS). This paper describes the application of the LSS framework in select locations of a national pharmacy chain. The implementation of a training program for improved recommendation techniques to promote higher rates of pneumococcal vaccinations in high-risk adult populations is also addressed. A mixed-methods approach including pre/post quasi-experimental design and in-depth key informant interviews was used.

Racial and ethnic disparities due to Medicare Part D Star Ratings criteria among kidney transplant patients with diabetes, hypertension, and/or dyslipidemia.

BACKGROUND: Policies such as Medicare Part D Star Ratings are designed to encourage medication adherence and facilitate positive health outcomes. Patients who have received a kidney transplant not included in assessment of Star Ratings measures may have worse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine if criteria for inclusion in assessment of Star Ratings medication adherence measures among kidney transplant patients with diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia lead to racial and ethnic disparities in who is included in this assessment. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, secondary analysis of 94,822 adult kidney transplant patients receiving continuous coverage of Medicare Parts A/B/D and filling at least 1 prescription for diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia in 2017. Utilizing 2017 Medicare claims, inclusion in assessment of Star Ratings measures was determined based on criteria for each measure concerning adherence to oral diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia medication. Binary and multinomial logistic regression were conducted. RESULTS: Among kidney transplant patients with diabetes only, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely than White patients to be included in assessment of the Star Ratings adherence measure for oral diabetes medications (P < 0.0001). Among kidney transplant patients with hypertension only and dyslipidemia only, all racial and ethnic minority groups were less likely to be included in assessments of Star Ratings adherence measures for oral hypertension and dyslipidemia medications (P < 0.001). For example, among patients with hypertension, adjusted odds ratios for inclusion of Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients were 0.44 (95% CI = 0.40-0.49), 0.56 (95% CI = 0.49-0.63), and 0.55 (95% = CI 0.45-0.67), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities exist among patients who have received a kidney transplant qualifying for inclusion in Star Ratings measures, which may ultimately facilitate adverse health outcomes. DISCLOSURES: Marie Chisholm-Burns is a member of the American Society of Transplantation Board of Directors. Christina Spivey has no conflicts of interest to disclose. Chi Chun Tsang has no conflicts of interest to disclose. Junling Wang received funding for this project from the National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health; she has also received funding from AbbVie and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (additionally, she has received consulting fees from the latter). Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01AG049696 (Principal Investigator: Junling Wang). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The sponsor of the research does not have any role in any aspect of the research, including study design and the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; the writing of the report; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Effects of Medicare comprehensive medication review on racial/ethnic disparities in nonadherence to statin medications among patients with Alzheimer's Disease: an observational analysis.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is the mostcommon cause of dementia, a neurological disorder characterized by memory loss and judgment impairment. Hyperlipidemia, a commonly co-occurring condition, should be treated to prevent associated complications. Medication adherence may be difficult for individuals with AD due to the complexity of AD management. Comprehensive Medication Reviews (CMRs), a required component of Medicare Part D Medication Therapy Management (MTM), have been shown to improve medication adherence. However, many MTM programs do not target AD. Additionally, racial/ethnic disparities in MTM eligibility have been revealed. Thus, this study examined the effects of CMR receipt on reducing racial/ethnic disparities in the likelihood of nonadherence to hyperlipidemia medications (statins) among the AD population. METHODS: This retrospective study used 2015-2017 Medicare data linked to the Area Health Resources Files. The likelihood of nonadherence to statin medications across racial/ethnic groups was compared between propensity-score-matched CMR recipients and non-recipients in a ratio of 1 to 3. A difference-in-differences method was utilized to determine racial/ethnic disparity patterns using a logistic regression by including interaction terms between dummy variables for CMR receipt and each racial/ethnic minority group (non-Hispanic Whites, or Whites, as reference). RESULTS: The study included 623,400 Medicare beneficiaries. Blacks and Hispanics had higher statin nonadherence than Whites: Compared to Whites, Blacks' nonadherence rate was 4.53% higher among CMR recipients and 7.35% higher among non-recipients; Hispanics' nonadherence rate was 2.69% higher among CMR recipients and 7.38% higher among non-recipients. Differences in racial/ethnic disparities between CMR recipients and non-recipients were significant for each minority group (p < 0.05) except Others. The difference between Whites and Hispanics in the odds of statin nonadherence was 11% lower among CMR recipients compared to non-recipients (OR = 0.89; 95% Confidence Interval = 0.85-0.94 for the interaction term between dummy variables for CMR and Hispanics). Interaction terms between dummy variables for CMR and other racial/ethnic minorities were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Receiving a CMR was associated with a disparity reduction in nonadherence to statin medications between Hispanics and Whites among patients with AD. Strategies need to be explored to increase the number of MTM programs that target AD and promote CMR completion.

Examining Preparatory Testing and Other Factors Associated With Performance on the Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination.

Objective. To evaluate whether the score on the Pre-Multistate Pharmacy Jurisprudence Examination (Pre-MPJE) predicts pharmacy students' performance on the MPJE, and to determine whether demographics, pre-pharmacy school factors, or pharmacy school factors affect MPJE outcomes.Methods. We performed a retrospective review of pharmacy school graduates' (N = 156) MPJE scores, Pre-MPJE scores, demographics, pre-pharmacy school academic performance factors, and pharmacy school academic performance factors. Bivariate and correlational analyses were conducted along with multiple linear regression models to determine the influence of variables on the MPJE total scaled score.Results. A total of 136 pharmacy school graduates were included, with most being female (59%) and non-Hispanic White students (75%). The score on the Pre-MPJE was not significantly correlated with students' first-attempt MPJE pass-fail outcome or total scaled score. Factors that were correlated with passing the MPJE were a younger age at graduation, a higher pharmacy law course grade, Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment (PCOA) examination scores, specifically scaled total scores and scaled scores for content areas 1-4 and final pharmacy school grade point average (GPA). The MPJE total scaled score was correlated with a higher pre-pharmacy school GPA, pharmacy law course grade, PCOA total and content area 1-4 scaled scores, and final pharmacy school GPA. However, regression models found that the greatest variance in MPJE total scaled score was contributed by the pharmacy law course grade. The total scaled score on the PCOA contributed to some variance for all MPJE takers, but only the pharmacy law course grade significantly influenced the in-state MPJE total scaled score.Conclusion. The findings did not show that the Pre-MPJE score was a predictor for passing the MPJE or for the MPJE total scaled score. The most important determinant of the MPJE total scaled score was a student's performance in the pharmacy law course.

Racial and ethnic disparities associated with the measure for drug-drug interactions among Medicare beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) cause many preventable hospitalizations and admissions. Efforts have been made to raise DDI awareness and reduce DDI occurrence; for example, Medicare Part D Star Ratings, a health plan quality assessment program, included a DDI measure. Previous research reported racial and ethnic disparities in health services utilization and that racial and ethnic minorities, compared with non-Hispanic whites (whites), may be less likely to be targeted for a similar measure, a Star Ratings adherence measure for diabetes medications. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether any racial and ethnic disparities are associated with the DDI measure in Part D Star Ratings among Medicare populations with diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed a 2017 Medicare Part D data sample, including 3,960,813 beneficiaries. Because the inclusion in the denominator of the Star Ratings DDI measure was determined by the use of a list of target medications, the likelihood of using a listed target medication was compared between racial and ethnic minorities and whites. Individuals with diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were included in the analysis owing to the high prevalence of these conditions. Patient- and community-level characteristics were adjusted by logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the entire study sample, 26.2% used a target medication. Compared with whites, most racial and ethnic minorities were less likely to use a target medication. For example, among individuals with diabetes, blacks, Hispanics, Asians/Pacific Islanders, and others had, respectively, 14% (odds ratio 0.86 [95% CI 0.84-0.88]), 5% (0.95 [0.93-0.98]), 12% (0.88 [0.84-0.92]), and 10% (0.90 [0.87-0.93]) lower odds compared with whites. Findings were similar among hypertension and hyperlipidemia cohorts, except that Hispanics had similar odds of use as whites. CONCLUSION: Most racial and ethnic minorities may have lower likelihood of being targeted for the DDI measure compared with whites. Future studies should examine whether these disparities affect health outcomes and devise new DDI measures for racial and ethnic minorities.

Resilience and First-Year Pharmacy Students' Academic Performance in a Pharmacy Math Course.

Objective. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between academic resilience and academic success in Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students.Methods. A cross-sectional survey using the Academic Pharmacy Resilience Scale (APRS-16) was conducted in two cohorts of first year pharmacy (P1) students (n = 374) during fall orientation in 2019 and 2020. The following data were also collected from student records: demographics, pre-pharmacy grade point average (GPA), Pharmacy Math outcome (passing or failing the course), and Pharmacy Math final numerical grade. Academic success was defined as achieving a passing grade in a Pharmacy Math course. Correlational, multiple logistic regression, and multiple linear regression analysis were conducted.Results. The survey response rate was 98.1%, and approximately 95% of participants passed Pharmacy Math. No significant correlations were found between Pharmacy Math final pass/fail outcome or Pharmacy Math final numerical grade and APRS-16 overall and subscale scores. In multiple logistic regression, neither pre-pharmacy GPA nor APRS overall scale or subscale scores were significantly associated with final Pharmacy Math outcome (passing/failing). In multiple linear regression, pre-pharmacy GPA was significantly associated with Pharmacy Math final numerical grade, but APRS-16 overall score and subscale scores were not.Conclusion. First-year pharmacy students' performance in Pharmacy Math was not influenced by academic resilience. Studies like this one examining the relationship between pharmacy students' resilience and academic performance are lacking. Future studies should assess whether academic resilience may affect performance in other courses as well as performance in the PharmD curriculum.

Leadership lessons from administrators, faculty, and students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the largescale scope of the COVID-19 pandemic, strain on the higher education system in the United States has been extraordinary. Yet, with any crisis, there is the opportunity to learn, grow, and develop new knowledge and strategies to benefit educational programs moving forward. The purpose of this study is to describe the leadership lessons learned by academic pharmacy during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of administrators, faculty, and students. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of qualitative data provided by three focus groups. Each focus group was composed of one of three distinct college of pharmacy constituencies: (1) members of the college's executive team, (2) faculty members who currently or in the recent past served in college leadership positions, and (3) students in an elective pharmacy leadership course. Focus groups were semi-structured, and discussion concerned leadership lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. A modified form of inductive content analysis and abstraction was used to assess qualitative data collected during the focus groups. RESULTS: Five main themes emerged across all three focus groups, which include open and ongoing communication, staying connected, turning crisis into opportunity, being adaptable/flexible, and finding ways to stay productive. Themes unique to each focus group were also identified. CONCLUSIONS: Core leadership lessons in emergent situations like the COVID-19 pandemic, including adaptability to the changing environment and communicating accurately and with appropriate frequency, illustrate the need for flexibility during times of crisis and highlight areas of focus for future planning.

Effects of peer-led study sessions on first-year student pharmacist performance in pharmacy math.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate effects of peer-led study sessions on performance in a traditionally challenging course, Pharmacy Math, among first-year student pharmacists (P1s). METHODS: Peer-led study sessions were conducted throughout fall 2019 for P1s. Sessions were led by two second-year student pharmacists and focused on study skills and course-related strategies, principles, and content. P1s who attended the majority (at least five) of study sessions were compared to those who attended fewer sessions on student demographics, undergraduate science grade point average, and course outcome (pass/did not pass) using chi-square and independent samples t-tests. Relative risk (RR) was calculated. A sub-analysis of students considered at risk of failing was also conducted. RESULTS: There were 200 P1 participants. Twenty-four students (12%) attended the majority of the sessions and 176 students (88%) attended fewer sessions. Of the 24 students who attended ≥ five study sessions, all passed Pharmacy Math, while 12 of the 176 students who attended fewer sessions failed Pharmacy Math. Students who attended ≥ five sessions had a 6.8% reduction in risk of failing compared to students who attended fewer sessions (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.895, 0.97). More striking, at-risk students who attended ≥ five study sessions had a 17.1% reduction in risk of failing. CONCLUSIONS: Peer-led study sessions contribute to reduced risk of failing Pharmacy Math among students who attend a majority of study sessions. Improvements for the future were identified, including mandatory attendance, group structure, and creative ways to cover concepts.

Developing a Framework of Relationships Among Noncognitive Factors in Doctor of Pharmacy Students' Academic Performance.

Objective. To develop a framework of the effects of select noncognitive factors (grit, perceived stress, internal locus of control, and select Big Five personality traits) on pharmacy students' academic performance.Methods. A survey measuring select noncognitive factors was administered to two cohorts of first professional year (P1) pharmacy students (entering classes of 2019 and 2020, n=374) during fall orientation. Demographics, pre-pharmacy GPA, and P1 fall semester GPA were collected from student records. Structural equation modeling was conducted to assess the proposed framework.Results. Academic performance was directly influenced by students' (n=367; 98.1%) perceived stress and neuroticism and indirectly influenced by internal locus of control and neuroticism (via perceived stress as mediator). Neuroticism has a complex relationship in the models as it was directly and positively associated with academic performance, and indirectly contributed to decreased academic performance via a positive association with perceived stress. Squared multiple correlations indicated 13% and 9% of the variance in academic performance in the first final model (academic performance measured by pre-pharmacy GPA and P1 fall GPA) and second final model (academic performance measured by P1 fall GPA), respectively, were explained by the predictor variables.Conclusion. Evidence provided by structural equation modeling supports the conclusion that select noncognitive factors, namely perceived stress, neuroticism, and internal locus of control, have direct and indirect effects on the academic success of P1 students. The model variances of 9% and 13% represent 36% to 52% of the predictive value of the most accepted cognitive measures used to determine students' potential for academic success.