Insulin sensitivity differs among ethnic groups with a compensatory response in beta-cell function.

OBJECTIVE: A drastic difference is evident in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes among ethnic groups. We examined the role of beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity in this disparity among 4 ethnic groups. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: beta-Cell function and insulin sensitivity were assessed in 77 healthy glucose-tolerant subjects using a hyperglycemic clamp (18 Asian-Americans, 9 African-Americans, 34 Caucasians, and 16 Mexican-Americans). RESULTS: A wide range of variation was evident in clinical features of the studied subjects. Insulin sensitivity index and the second-phase insulin response differed among the 4 groups (P = 0.0023 and P = 0.0082, respectively), whereas the first-phase insulin response was marginally different (P = 0.1090). Stepwise regression analysis revealed that ethnicity was an independent determinant for the insulin sensitivity index (P = 0.0014) after adjusting for sex, age, diastolic blood pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, and BMI. Also, a compensatory response of beta-cell function was observed among the ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed a drastic difference in insulin sensitivity among the different ethnic groups and observed that their beta-cell function compensates for the prevailing insulin sensitivity. The difference in the prevalence of abnormal glucose tolerance in different ethnic groups could be a result of differences in insulin sensitivity

Familial hyperinsulinism with apparent autosomal dominant inheritance: clinical and genetic differences from the autosomal recessive variant.

We describe three families with hypoglycemia caused by familial hyperinsulinism (HI) in whom vertical transmission of the disorder occurred, suggesting autosomal dominant (AD) inheritance. We therefore examined the relationship between the apparent AD disorder and the more common autosomal recessive (AR) form of HI, which has recently been linked to the sulfonylurea receptor on chromosome 11p15.1. The clinical features of the 11 patients with AD HI were milder than those seen in 14 patients with AR HI. Hypoglycemia was readily controlled with either diet alone or with diazoxide in 10 of 11 patients with AD HI but in none of those with the AR form. In one large pedigree, analysis of genomic DNA with polymorphic simple sequence repeat markers excluded linkage of AD HI to the SUR locus in a dominant manner. The possibility of linkage to the SUR locus could not be absolutely excluded in the two smaller pedigrees. None of the published mutations of the SUR gene identified in patients with AR HI were detected in the patients with the AD form. We conclude that the AD form of hyperinsulinism is phenotypically different from the AR variant. The identification of more families with this form of HI may make it possible to locate the responsible gene by the use of linkage analysis.