ABSTRACT
Purpose: Patients with septicemia caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bacteremia have higher mortality rates than patients infected by VSE. Vancomycin or teicoplanin is selected as the antibiotic stewardship intervention to cover methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections before blood culture reveals VRE bacteremia in critically ill patients with Gram-positive cocci (GPC) bacteremia; this may require linezolid or daptomycin treatment instead. We thus evaluated antibiotic stewardship practices, such as appropriate timing of antibiotic use in GPC bacteremia, and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with VRE infection. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 191 critically ill patients with enterococcal bacteremia at the Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital during January 1, 2019-December 31, 2020. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as disease outcomes and appropriate antibiotic use after GPC bacteremia diagnosis, were compared between the VRE and VSE groups. Results: Of 191 patients, 55 had VRE bacteremia (case group) and 136 had VSE bacteremia (control group). The rate of antibiotic change after initial antibiotic use for GPC bacteremia was higher in the VRE bacteremia group (100% vs 10.3%; p<0.001). The time to appropriate antibiotic administration after GPC bacteremia diagnosis was longer in the VRE bacteremia group (3.3±2.1 vs 1.5±1.8 days; p<0.001). Patients with VRE bacteremia had higher 28-day mortality rates (relative risk, 1.997; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.041-3.83). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that delayed appropriate antibiotic administration of >3 days after GPC bacteremia diagnosis increased the risks of 28-day all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.045; 95% CI, 1.089-3.84; p=0.026) in patients with VRE infection. Conclusion: Patients with VRE bacteremia with delayed appropriate antibiotic administration of >3 days after GPC bacteremia diagnosis had increased 28-day mortality risks. New strategies for early VRE detection in GPC bacteremia may shorten the time to administer appropriate antibiotics and lower mortality rates.
ABSTRACT
This was a preliminary study on ultraviolet C (UVC) irradiation for SARS-CoV-2-contaminated hospital environments. Forty-eight locations were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR (33.3% contamination rate). After series dosages of 222-nm UVC irradiation, samples from the surfaces were negative at 15 s irradiation at 2 cm length (fluence: 81 mJ/cm2).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Disinfection , Humans , Ultraviolet Rays , Virus Inactivation/radiation effectsABSTRACT
To overcome the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, transmission routes, such as healthcare worker infection, must be effectively prevented. Ultraviolet C (UVC) (254 nm) has recently been demonstrated to prevent environmental contamination by infected patients; however, studies on its application in contaminated hospital settings are limited. Herein, we explored the clinical application of UVC and determined its optimal dose. Environmental samples (n = 267) collected in 2021 were analyzed by a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and subjected to UVC irradiation for different durations (minutes). We found that washbasins had a high contamination rate (45.5%). SARS-CoV-2 was inactivated after 15 min (estimated dose: 126 mJ/cm2) of UVC irradiation, and the contamination decreased from 41.7% before irradiation to 16.7%, 8.3%, and 0% after 5, 10, and 15 min of irradiation, respectively (p = 0.005). However, SARS-CoV-2 was still detected in washbasins after irradiation for 20 min but not after 30 min (252 mJ/cm2). Thus, 15 min of 254-nm UVC irradiation was effective in cleaning plastic, steel, and wood surfaces in the isolation ward. For silicon items, such as washbasins, 30 min was suggested; however, further studies using hospital environmental samples are needed to confirm the effective UVC inactivation of SARS-CoV-2.