Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
Clin Rehabil ; 25(9): 814-22, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21427150

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of intermittent cervical traction in the treatment of chronic neck pain over a 12-week follow-up. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Hospital-based outpatient practice. SUBJECTS: Seventy-nine patients with chronic neck pain. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomly assigned to either experimental group (n = 39, mean age = 50.5 ± 9.8) or control group (n = 40, mean age = 48.8 ± 9.1). Experimental group received intermittent cervical traction and control group received infrared irradiation alone; twice a week over a period of six weeks. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The values of Chinese version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ), verbal numerical pain scale (VNPS), and cervical active range of motion (AROM) were measured at baseline, six-week and 12-week follow-up. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the two groups in the NPQ (P > 0.05), VNPS (P > 0.05) and AROM (P > 0.05).


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/therapy , Neck Pain/therapy , Traction , Adult , Aged , China , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/methods , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 35(21): E1088-95, 2010 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20838266

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A regionally representative telephone survey using a 2-stage randomization process. OBJECTIVE: (1) To investigate the prevalence and consequence of neck pain in terms of disability and rate of absenteeism from work. (2) To describe the health services utilization pattern of neck pain subjects and to analyse the factors associated with neck pain and health services utilization pattern. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has been a lack of reliable information on the health service utilization pattern of neck pain subjects, the consequences and the patient perceived effectiveness of neck pain management in Hong Kong and Asian countries. METHODS: Subjects were interviewed on the sociodemographic characteristics, occurrence and consequences of neck pain, and the health utilization pattern. A random sample of the respondents was re-interviewed 7 to 10 days after the initial interview, by an independent interviewer for the reliability check. RESULTS: A total of 4640 subjects were interviewed. The 12-month prevalence was 64.6% (95% CI: 63.2%-66.0%). About 38.0% of these patients suffered from moderate to severe pain. Moreover, 17.7% of these subjects had to limit their social activities and 19% had to limit their work. About 25% of those subjects had consulted medical or health practitioners. Medical consultation is the majority and physiotherapy came second. Self-massage was the most preferred (83.3%) mode of self-care. Physiotherapy was regarded as the most effective health service, with 60% of the respondents' neck pain completely removed. Although most people chose self-massage to be the most effective self-care treatment, only one-third (30.2%) of them had their neck pain improved by less than a half. CONCLUSION: Neck pain is highly prevalent with an increasing impact in Hong Kong. More than one-third of neck pain patients suffered from moderate to severe pain and around 20% of them had to limit their work. About 25% of neck pain patient have consulted medical or health professionals. Physiotherapy and private medical clinic were the 2 service providers with high percentage of perceived complete improvement. There was a general trend that more neck pain patients used complementary therapies.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Health Surveys/methods , Interviews as Topic/methods , Neck Pain/epidemiology , Neck Pain/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Absenteeism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Asian People/ethnology , Community Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Hong Kong/ethnology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neck Pain/ethnology , Referral and Consultation/trends , Young Adult
3.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 23(3): 129-36, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20858942

ABSTRACT

PURPOSES: To investigate the responses of the craniovertebral (CV) angle to backpack loadings in adolescents with and without neck pain and to explore the relationships between CV angle, relative backpack weight, neck pain and disability. METHODS: A cross-sectional single-blinded study was conducted on 60 adolescents (30 neck pain and 30 non-neck pain) aged from 13 to 18 years old. The verbal analog scale (VAS) and Chinese version of Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) were used to assess neck pain severity and disability respectively. CV angle was measured in neutral and with backpack loadings of 5% to 30% of subject's body weight by using the Head Posture Spinal Curvature Instrument (HPSCI). RESULTS: In both groups, CV angles gradually decreased with increment of backpack loadings and the amount of decreases became significant from 10% body weight onwards (P < 0.05). Although the changes of CV angles did not show any significant differences at any point of comparison between the groups, the neck pain group showed a clinically significant decrease of CV angle (∼ 5°) at 10% relative loading whereas non-neck pain group did it at 15% relative loading. Change of CV angles did not show significant correlations with relative backpack weight, cervical pain and disability (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested a safety limit of 10% relative backpack load for adolescents. The results showed the tendency that the ability of maintaining good head posture in response to backpack loadings by non-neck pain subjects might be better than those with neck pain.


Subject(s)
Neck Pain/etiology , Spinal Curvatures , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Adolescent , Analysis of Variance , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Pain Measurement , Physical Examination , Posture , Single-Blind Method , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 22(4): 197-203, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20023350

ABSTRACT

PURPOSES: To investigate the responses of the craniovertebral (CV) angle to backpack loadings in adolescents with and without neck pain and to explore the relationships between CV angle, relative backpack weight, neck pain and disability. METHODS: A cross-sectional single-blinded study was conducted on 60 adolescents (30 neck pain and 30 non-neck pain) aged from 13 to 18 years old. The verbal analog scale (VAS) and Chinese version of Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) were used to assess neck pain severity and disability respectively. CV angle was measured in neutral and with backpack loadings of 5% to 30% of subject's body weight by using the Head Posture Spinal Curvature Instrument (HPSCI). RESULTS: In both groups, CV angles gradually decreased with increment of backpack loadings and the amount of decreases became significant from 10% body weight onwards (P < 0.05). Although the changes of CV angles did not show any significant differences at any point of comparison between the groups, the neck pain group showed a clinically significant decrease of CV angle ( approximately 5 degrees ) at 10% relative loading whereas non-neck pain group did it at 15% relative loading. Change of CV angles did not show significant correlations with relative backpack weight, cervical pain and disability (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested a safety limit of 10% relative backpack load for adolescents. The results showed the tendency that the ability of maintaining good head posture in response to backpack loadings by non-neck pain subjects might be better than those with neck pain.


Subject(s)
Books , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Spinal Curvatures/physiopathology , Spine/physiopathology , Adolescent , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disability Evaluation , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Posture , Single-Blind Method , Weight-Bearing/physiology
5.
South Med J ; 101(11): 1101-5, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19088517

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Children with chronic medical conditions (CMCs) are considered to be at increased risk for influenza and its related complications. Despite this, influenza immunization rates in the United States for children with CMCs in the primary care setting remain between 7-10%. This was a survey study looking at the barriers to influenza immunization among children with CMCs other than asthma. We examined caregiver knowledge and perceptions regarding influenza vaccine in addition to assessing other barriers, such as availability and perceived safety of the vaccine. METHODS: The study was conducted during the fall-winter influenza seasons of 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 at five academic institutions across the southeastern US. Convenience samples of 100-150 families attending pediatric subspecialty clinics were surveyed. RESULTS: A total of 794 surveys were completed. Controlling for disease, failure to recommend vaccination was significantly associated with failure to get the vaccine (P < 0.0001). Of the children who did not receive the vaccine, 61% of their parents believed that the vaccine itself could give influenza, 54% cited other safety concerns, and 30% thought it did not work. Among vaccine recipients, 163 (43%) reported that the primary care provider had given the vaccine, whereas 171 (45%) reported that the vaccine had been given at the subspecialty clinic. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of physician recommendation, as well as parental education, as some of the key elements crucial to the receipt of influenza vaccination in children with CMCs.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Parents/psychology , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease , Contraindications , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Southeastern United States/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Clin Rehabil ; 21(9): 812-21, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17875561

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between fear-avoidance beliefs and future disability and work capacity in patients with neck pain. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: Physiotherapy outpatient departments. PATIENTS: One hundred and twenty patients with neck pain intensity sufficient to affect their work capacity. INTERVENTIONS: Patients participated in either six-week conventional physiotherapy or an exercise training programme to test whether the type of treatment received by the patients together with other outcome measures affected the predictive power of fear-avoidance beliefs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients underwent examination of the active neck range of movements and neck muscle strength and completed the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, the Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and the 11-point pain numerical rating scale. These were assessed at the beginning and at week 6 of the rehabilitation programme. Patients' work capacity was assessed at week 6 and three months after the six-week rehabilitation programme. RESULTS: Spearman's correlation coefficients between fear-avoidance beliefs and initial and week 6 disability levels were 0.47 and 0.48, respectively. Regression analysis showed that the fear-avoidance beliefs significantly improved the goodness of fit of the model for predicting week 6 disability levels and return to complete work capacity at week 6 and three months after the rehabilitation programme, even after controlling for the physical impairments, the health status, the pain intensity and the type of treatment received. CONCLUSIONS: The fear-avoidance beliefs factor is an important biopsychosocial variable in predicting future disability level and return to complete work capacity in patients with neck pain.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Disabled Persons/classification , Employment/psychology , Fear , Neck Pain/psychology , Pain/psychology , Adult , Disabled Persons/psychology , Female , Hong Kong , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Pain/classification , Physical Therapy Modalities , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 46(3): 241-6, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17416880

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to determine if culture confirmation is needed for a negative rapid antigen detection test. Data on 18,509 tests done in patients younger than 18 years old were reviewed. Of the 14,167 (76.5%) that were negative, 968 (6.8%) were associated with positive cultures. No significant seasonal variation was noted. Significant differences were found between hospital and pediatric practices in the percentage of patients with a negative rapid antigen detection test who actually had group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (3.5% to 9.8%). This study supports the recommendation of culture confirmation of a negative rapid antigen detection test and validation of results within an individual practice if confirmatory cultures are not being performed. This study showed a high false-negative rate of the negative rapid antigen detection test and variation among hospital and pediatric practices for rates of positive culture after a negative rapid antigen detection test.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Immunoassay/methods , Pharyngitis/microbiology , Streptococcal Infections/diagnosis , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Bacteriological Techniques , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Pharyngitis/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Seasons , Sensitivity and Specificity , Streptococcal Infections/epidemiology , Time Factors
8.
Ambul Pediatr ; 7(2): 192-5, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17368416

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To explore the relationship(s) between USMLE, In-Training Exam, and American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) board-certifying exam scores within a Pediatric residency-training program. METHODS: Data were abstracted from records of graduating residents from the Pediatric residency program at the University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville from 1999 to 2005. Seventy (70) residents were identified and their files reviewed for the following information: USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores, in-training exam results and eventual board scores as reported by the ABP. Correlation and regression analyses were performed and compared across all tests. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients between the three types of tests were all statistically significant. Using logistic regression, however, only USMLE Step 1 scores (compared to Step 2) had a statistically significant association with board performance. Interestingly, none of the three in-training exam scores had any additional impact on predicting board performance given one's USMLE Step 1 score. USMLE Step 1 scores greater than 220 were associated with nearly a 95 per cent passage rate on the board-certifying exam. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggests that performance on USMLE Step 1 is an important predictor of a resident's chances of passing the pediatric boards. This information, which is available when a resident initiates training, can be used to identify those at risk of not passing the boards. While Step 1 scores should not be used as a sole determinant in the recruiting process, individual learning plans can be developed and implemented early in training to maximize one's ability to pass the certifying exam.


Subject(s)
Educational Measurement , Pediatrics , Specialty Boards , Forecasting , Humans , Internship and Residency , Models, Statistical , Probability , United States
9.
J Occup Rehabil ; 17(1): 19-32, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16933144

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and occupational risk factors of neck and upper limb disorders among secondary school teachers. METHODS: One hundred secondary schools in Hong Kong were randomly chosen. Every full-time teacher received a questionnaire and a letter describing the purpose of the study. Questionnaires were collected 1 to 3 weeks later. RESULTS: Among 3,100 secondary school teachers, the lifelong prevalence of neck pain and upper limb pain was 69.3% (2091/3018) and 35.8% (1088/3042) respectively. The lifelong cumulative incidence of both neck and upper limb pain was 31.6% (938/2966). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that gender, age and working in head down posture were identified as risk factors for neck and upper limb pain. High workload, low colleague support and high anxiety were found to be significant on affecting the neck pain and upper limb pain developed after becoming teachers. CONCLUSIONS: Neck pain and upper limb pain were highly prevalent in secondary school teachers in Hong Kong. Gender, age, head down posture and some psychological factors were found to be significant risk factors.


Subject(s)
Faculty , Neck Pain/epidemiology , Pain/epidemiology , Upper Extremity/physiopathology , Adult , Age Factors , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/physiopathology , Female , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Posture/physiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Social Support , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workload
10.
Clin Rehabil ; 20(10): 909-20, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17008342

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To translate the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and investigate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the questionnaire in patients with neck pain. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional and prospective study. SETTING: Physiotherapy outpatient departments. SUBJECTS: Four samples with 476 consecutive adult patients with neck pain from four physiotherapy centres. METHODS: The original questionnaire was translated into Chinese by forward and backward translation and reviewed by a panel of experts. The subjects completed the Chinese version of the fear-avoidance questionnaire, Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and their pain intensity was measured using an 11-point pain numerical rating scale. They were observed and measured at the beginning of physiotherapy, at week 3 and at week 6 after treatment began. RESULTS: The questionnaire had very good content validity and test-retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.81 and Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.90. Spearman's correlation coefficients between fear-avoidance and the neck pain questionnaire, the health survey (physical), health survey (mental) and pain scale were 0.56, 0.45, 0.36 and 0.34, respectively. The standard response mean and effect size at week 6 were 0.38 and 0.32, respectively. Factor analysis yielded three factors which accounted for 61.6% of the total variance of the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for patients with neck pain. It has been shown to demonstrate very good content validity, a high degree of test-retest reliability and internal consistency, good construct validity and medium responsiveness.


Subject(s)
Avoidance Learning , Fear/psychology , Neck Pain/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results
11.
Int J Rehabil Res ; 29(3): 217-20, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16900042

ABSTRACT

This is a cross-sectional and prospective study to examine the correlation between the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire and the Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey on patients with neck pain in the course of physiotherapy. A total of 359 consecutive adult patients with neck pain, from three physiotherapy outpatient departments, who completed the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire and Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, were observed and measured at different intervals - at the beginning of physiotherapy, at week 3, week 6 and upon discharge from physiotherapy. The results showed that both the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire and the Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey were able to differentiate patients with neck pain in health and diseased states. The Spearman's correlation coefficients between the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical and mental component summary scores at entry of physiotherapy were -0.64 with the physical component summary score and -0.44 with the mental component summary score, and, at discharge from physiotherapy, were -0.75 with the physical component summary score and -0.46 with the mental component summary score. The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire has psychometric properties with both physical and mental dimensions of measurement of pain in patients with neck pain.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Neck Pain/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Therapy Modalities , Prospective Studies
12.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 31(16): E540-4, 2006 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16845340

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted using a two-stage randomization process. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this paper were to investigate the prevalence of neck pain and their consequences and risk groups in the Hong Kong population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has been a lack of recent information on the prevalence and consequences of neck pain in the population of Hong Kong. METHODS: A total of 664 subjects were interviewed on the socio-demographic characteristics, occurrence, and consequences of neck pain. A random sample of the respondents was reinterviewed after 7 to 10 days later, by another interviewer for the reliability check. RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of neck pain was 65.4% (95% confidence interval, 61.8%-69.0%). The 12-month prevalence was 53.6% (41.0% in male, 59.0% in female) (95% confidence interval, 49.8%-57.4%). About 15.0% of these patients had moderate to severe pain. Moreover, 4.5% of these subjects had to limit their social activities and 3.1% had to limit their work. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that females, managers, administrators, and professionals have a high risk of neck pain in the population of Hong Kong. CONCLUSION: Neck pain is highly prevalent in Hong Kong, particularly among females, managers, administrators, and professionals.


Subject(s)
Neck Pain/epidemiology , Neck Pain/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Distribution , Single-Blind Method , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
13.
Clin Rehabil ; 19(8): 850-60, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16323384

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on acupuncture points and neck exercise in chronic neck pain patients. DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Hospital-based practice. SUBJECTS: Two hundred and eighteen patients with chronic neck pain. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized into three groups, receiving either (1) TENS over the acupuncture points plus infrared irradiation (TENS group); (2) exercise training plus infrared irradiation (exercise group); or (3) infrared irradiation alone (control); twice a week for six weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: The values of verbal numeric pain scale, Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, and isometric neck muscle strength were assessed before, at the end of the six-week treatment, and at the six-month follow-up. RESULTS: Results demonstrated that after the six-week treatment, significant improvement in the verbal numerical pain scale was found only in the TENS group (0.60+/-2.54, p = 0.027) and the exercise group (1.57+/-2.67, p < 0.001). Though significant reduction in Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire score was found in all three groups, post-hoc tests showed that both the TENS and the exercise group produced better improvement (0.38+/-0.60% and 0.39+/-0.62% respectively) than the control group (0.23+/-0.63%). Significant improvement (p = < 0.001 to 0.03) in neck muscle strength was observed in all three groups, however, the improvement in the control group was not clinically significant and it could not be maintained at the six-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: After the six-week treatment, patients in the TENS and exercise group had a better and clinically relevant improvement in disability, isometric neck muscle strength, and pain. All the improvements in the intervention groups were maintained at the six-month follow-up.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Neck Pain/therapy , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation , Acupuncture Points , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
14.
Clin Rehabil ; 19(5): 505-13, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16119406

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the generic Current Perceived Health 42 (CPH42) Profile in Chinese patients with neck pain in Hong Kong. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: Physiotherapy outpatient departments. SUBJECTS: Two samples with 472 consecutive adult patients with neck pain from seven physiotherapy outpatient departments in Hong Kong. METHODS: Subjects were requested to complete the CPH42 Profile, and their pain intensity was measured using the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). They were observed and measured at the beginning of physiotherapy, at seven days, at week 3 and at week 6 after treatment began. RESULTS: The CPH42 Profile had very good test-retest reliability and internal consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.91, Cronbach's alpha 0.90). Validity was confirmed by a moderate correlation with the NRS at the beginning of treatment and week 6 (rank correlation 0.41-0.53). Moreover, a significant difference in scores was found between those who had sought medical consultation and/or had taken medication because of neck pain than those who did not. The responsiveness measured from the beginning of treatment to week 3 and week 6 (standard response means of 0.33 and 0.36) was comparable to the respective changes in pain intensity. CONCLUSION: The CPH42 Profile has been shown to demonstrate good reliability and validity, and it is sensitive to changes in severity over time. It is suitable for use as an outcome measure for evaluation of patients with neck pain.


Subject(s)
Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Status , Hong Kong , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neck Pain/classification , Physical Therapy Modalities , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
15.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 86(3): 534-40, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15759241

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlations among pain, physical impairments, disability, and patient satisfaction in patients with chronic neck pain. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study with 6-month follow-up. SETTING: Institutional practice. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (N=218) with chronic neck pain. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were treated with different physiotherapy modalities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were obtained for self-reported disability, verbal numeric pain scale, patient satisfaction, and 2 measures of physical impairments during the initial visit, at 6 weeks, and finally at 6 months. RESULTS: The correlation among 4 sets of measurements varied. Moderate correlation was noted between disability and patient satisfaction ( r range, .50-.65), and between disability and pain ( r range, .55-.63). A fair relationship was found between pain and patient satisfaction ( r range, .43-.48), but only weak relationships were found between physical impairments and pain ( r range, -.08 to -.25). The correlations tended to increase in the follow-up assessments. CONCLUSIONS: No strong correlations were found among disability, patient satisfaction, pain, and physical impairments although the correlations tended to increase in the follow-up assessments. The findings support the suggestion that clinicians should address as many relevant aspects of a presenting clinical entity as possible in the management of chronic neck pain.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged
16.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 30(1): E1-7, 2005 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15626966

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial with single-blind outcome assessments. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a neck exercise program in patients with chronic neck pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The effect of exercise for patients with chronic neck pain has been investigated in a number of studies. The efficacy is, however, questionable. METHODS: A total of 145 patients were randomly allocated into an exercise (n = 67) and a nonexercise (control) group (n = 78). Patients in the control group were given infrared irradiation and neck care advice. In addition to infrared irradiation and advice, patients in the exercise group had undergone an exercise program with activation of the deep neck muscles and dynamic strengthening of the neck muscles for 6 weeks. Subjective pain and disability and isometric neck muscle strength were measured at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 months. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: At week 6, the exercise group had a significantly better improvement in disability score (P = 0.03), subjective report of pain (P = 0.01), and in isometric neck muscle strength (P = 0.57-0.00) in most of the directions than the control group. However, significant differences between the two groups were found only in the subjective report of pain and patient satisfaction at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: At week 6, patients with chronic neck pain can benefit from the neck exercise program with significant improvement in disability, pain, and isometric neck muscle strength in different directions. However, the effect of exercise was less favorable at 6 months.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/methods , Neck Pain/therapy , Adult , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Isometric Contraction , Male , Middle Aged , Neck Muscles/physiology , Neck Pain/drug therapy , Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Self Medication , Sick Leave , Treatment Outcome
17.
Head Neck ; 26(12): 1031-7, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15515155

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: No available measure exists for postirradiation neck disability. Adoption of the Chinese Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) for patients with postirradiation neck disability was examined in this study. METHODS: Eight physiotherapists and five patients were invited to test the validity of the content. Forty-three patients with neck disability were recruited to evaluate test-retest reliability and internal consistency. The level of neck discomfort, range of neck motion and maximal isometric neck muscle strength, and SF-36 health score were measured for construct validity testing. RESULTS: The questionnaire had good content validity, a high degree of test-retest reliability, internal consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.94; Cronbach's alpha, 0.88), and good construct validity. NPQ correlated significantly with most of the subscores of SF-36 (r(s), -0.43 to - 0.71) and numeric rating scale (r(s) = 0.69). CONCLUSION: The modified Chinese NPQ was found to be reliable and valid for the evaluation of postirradiation neck disability.


Subject(s)
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neck Pain/diagnosis , Neck Pain/epidemiology , Physical Therapy Modalities/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Disability Evaluation , Female , Hong Kong , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Neck Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Radiation Injuries/complications , Radiation Injuries/diagnosis , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Factors
18.
Clin Rehabil ; 16(7): 772-9, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12428826

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the maximal isometric neck muscle strength in healthy Chinese volunteers, in six different directions, as measured by a Multi Cervical Rehabilitation Unit. DESIGN: A standardized cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: A university rehabilitation unit. SUBJECTS: Ninety-one healthy volunteers aged 20-84. METHODS: During the measurement the subject was instructed to do three consecutive steady contractions as hard as possible, with a 10-second rest in between each contraction and a 2-minute rest between different directions. The peak isometric strength for each of the six directions (flexion, extension, lateral flexions, protraction and retraction) was calculated. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in muscle strength between different age groups. Isometric muscle strength in the direction of right lateral flexion was significantly greater than that to the left in men (p = 0.030), but no difference was found in women (p = 0.297). Isometric strength in all directions in men was 1.2-1.7 times that in women (all p < 0.028). Correlations between physical measurements (height and weight) and strength values were all insignificant in both genders. CONCLUSION: Men have approximately 20-70% greater isometric neck muscle strength than women. Both men and women can maintain high levels of cervical muscle strength in six different directions up to their seventh decade. There is no significant correlation between physical measurements and isometric neck muscle strength.


Subject(s)
Isometric Contraction/physiology , Neck Muscles/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Cervical Vertebrae/physiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Endurance/physiology , Reference Values , Sex Factors , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...