Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 166
Filter
1.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(21): e166, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832476

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Korea Expert Committee on Immunization Practices (KECIP) is a key advisory body the government to develop guidelines and provide technical advisory activities on immunization policies in Korea. A recent policy study, inspired by global best practices, aims to enhance KECIP's functionality for providing timely and transparent recommendations in the face of evolving vaccine science and emerging infectious diseases like COVID-19. METHODS: This study reviewed the current status of KECIP and collected expert opinions through surveys and consultations. Among the 40 panel members who were surveyed, 19 responded to a questionnaire specifically designed to assess the potential areas of improvement within KECIP. RESULTS: The majority of respondents favored maintaining the current member count and emphasized the need for a subcommittee. Opinions varied on issues such as the length of KECIP's term, the representation of vaccine manufacturers' perspectives, and the chairperson's role. However, there was a consensus on the importance of expertise, transparency, and fair proceedings within the committee. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the pivotal role of KECIP in shaping national immunization policies, emphasizing the necessity for informed guidance amidst evolving vaccine science and emerging infectious diseases. Furthermore, it stressed the importance of enhancing KECIP's capacity to effectively address evolving public health challenges and maintain successful immunization programs in South Korea.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Consensus , Humans , Republic of Korea , COVID-19/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Immunization , Advisory Committees , SARS-CoV-2 , Health Policy , COVID-19 Vaccines
2.
Int J MCH AIDS ; 13: e003, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694892

ABSTRACT

The global challenge posed by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and its manifestation as acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) is underscored by the prevalence of 5.9 million people living with HIV in the Asia-Pacific region in 2018. Myanmar, among Asian nations, faces a particularly high burden with a prevalence of 0.7% among adults aged 15-49. Despite the disproportionate impact on at-risk populations, including injection drug users and commercial sex workers, there is a scarcity of data on public awareness of HIV/AIDS in Myanmar. This study utilizes the 2015-2016 Myanmar Demographic Health Survey to assess the impact of socioeconomic factors on the knowledge and attitudes of women toward HIV/AIDS. The analysis encompasses 12,885 respondents, revealing that while 91.6% were aware of AIDS, <60% possessed accurate knowledge of HIV transmission. The study identifies significant variations in knowledge and attitudes based on age, region, residence type, education, wealth index, and media exposure. Notably, younger women aged 15-19 exhibited the lowest HIV/AIDS knowledge scores. Wealth and education emerged as key determinants influencing both knowledge and attitudes. The findings emphasize the need for tailored public health interventions to address the knowledge gap among women in different settings in Myanmar. However, it is crucial to acknowledge the temporal limitation of the study, as the data were collected in 2015-2016. Caution is advised in generalizing the results to the present day, emphasizing the necessity for ongoing research to capture the evolving landscape of HIV/AIDS awareness. This study contributes valuable insights that can inform targeted interventions, promoting awareness and prevention strategies in Myanmar's dynamic public health context.

3.
BMJ ; 385: e076885, 2024 05 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777351

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between antibiotic use during pregnancy or early infancy and the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in children. DESIGN: Nationwide population based cohort study and sibling analysis. SETTING: Korea's National Health Insurance Service mother-child linked database, 2008-21. PARTICIPANTS: All children live born between 2009 and 2020, followed up until 2021 to compare those with and without antibiotic exposure during pregnancy or early infancy (first six months of life). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disorder, language disorder, and epilepsy in children. After 1:1 propensity score matching based on many potential confounders, hazard ratios with 95% confidence interval were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. A sibling analysis additionally accounted for unmeasured familial factors. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 1 961 744 children were identified for the pregnancy analysis and 1 609 774 children were identified for the early infancy analysis. Although antibiotic exposure during pregnancy was associated with increased risks of all four neurodevelopmental disorders in the overall cohort, these estimates were attenuated towards the null in the sibling analyses (hazard ratio for autism spectrum disorder 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.12; intellectual disorder 1.00, 0.93 to 1.07; language disorder 1.05, 1.02 to 1.09; and epilepsy 1.03, 0.98 to 1.08). Likewise, no association was observed between antibiotic exposure during early infancy and autism spectrum disorder (hazard ratio 1.00, 0.96 to 1.03), intellectual disorder (1.07, 0.98 to 1.15), and language disorder (1.04, 1.00 to 1.08) in the sibling analyses; however, a small increased risk of epilepsy was observed (1.13, 1.09 to 1.18). The results generally remained consistent across several subgroup and sensitivity analyses, except for slightly elevated risks observed among children who used antibiotics during very early life and those who used antibiotics for more than 15 days. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort study, antibiotic exposure during pregnancy or early infancy was not associated with an increased risk of autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disorder, or language disorder in children. However, elevated risks were observed in several subgroups such as children using antibiotics during very early life and those with long term antibiotic use, which warrants attention and further investigation. Moreover, antibiotic use during infancy was modestly associated with epilepsy, even after control for indications and familial factors. When prescribing antibiotics to pregnant women and infants, clinicians should carefully balance the benefits of use against potential risks.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Autism Spectrum Disorder , Epilepsy , Intellectual Disability , Language Disorders , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Humans , Female , Autism Spectrum Disorder/epidemiology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/chemically induced , Pregnancy , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/epidemiology , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/chemically induced , Infant , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Male , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Language Disorders/epidemiology , Language Disorders/chemically induced , Cohort Studies , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Infant, Newborn , Proportional Hazards Models , Child , Propensity Score , Adult
4.
Health Secur ; 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722247

ABSTRACT

The application of geospatial data often allows the tracing of people who are involved in activities of an illegal nature. In June 2021, we estimated the true magnitude of the spread of COVID-19 within the networks of escort-karaoke bars in Seoul, Republic of Korea, using geographic information system (GIS)-based contact tracing that was applied to our epidemiological investigation. Our joint rapid response team, composed of epidemic investigation officers and police personnel, identified 19 paper-traced cases and 158 GIS-traced cases from 5,692 confirmed cases in Seoul during the study period (June to July 2021). Our findings suggest that collaboration with law enforcement agencies and the use of overlaid satellite imagery in outbreak investigations enhances high vigilance and reduces the risk of potential breaches of human rights in the process.

5.
BMJ Paediatr Open ; 8(1)2024 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575171

ABSTRACT

The global impact of COVID-19 on children emphasises the need for effective vaccination. While most cases are mild, those with underlying conditions face severe risks. Public health agencies promote various paediatric vaccination approaches. Japan universally recommends vaccination, while Korea prioritises high-risk children. Despite similar healthcare systems, Japan's coverage rates (19%-72%) surpass Korea's (2%-55%). Korea's child death rates are higher, indicating increased risk. Both lack methods to address individual risks, hindering prevention. This study advocates universal vaccination to mitigate future pandemics' impact on children systematically.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Child , COVID-19/prevention & control , Japan/epidemiology , Korea , Public Health , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
6.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(13): e121, 2024 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599598

ABSTRACT

National vaccine injury compensation serves as a crucial and significant safety net for individuals affected by government-recommended vaccines during a pandemic, contributing to the community's overall safety. In the Republic of Korea, compensation for adverse events resulting from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations has been provided through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program introduced in 1995. However, there have been limitations with these measures during the COVID-19 pandemic owing to strict criteria for substantiating causality between the vaccine and injury, its nontransparent process of determining whether to compensate, and the compensation amount that is not practically calculated. This article reviewed the Vaccine Injury Compensation Programs in 10 major countries to present implications for improving the Korean system. Expanding the scope of national accountability is essential to compensate for the consequences of adhering to national policies during public health crises. Therefore, valuable insight can be obtained from examining the systems in Germany, Japan, and Taiwan, which have implemented more relaxed criteria for determining causality in compensation cases; Thailand's system, which provides the mandatory payment of preliminary compensation for damage caused by vaccination; systems in Germany, France, and Japan, which offer compensation for vaccine injuries from a practical perspective; and systems in France and the United Kingdom, which have a process allowing the assessment records to be shared with the claimants. Furthermore, a dedicated agency for vaccine injury compensation, as seen in France, the United Kingdom, and Australia, is necessary to enhance the efficiency of the Korean system.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Pandemics/prevention & control , Compensation and Redress , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/etiology , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines/adverse effects
8.
Vaccine ; 42(14): 3333-3336, 2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604914

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccines are vital for public health, but concerns about adverse effects, particularly myocarditis and pericarditis linked to COVID-19 vaccines-, persist. This study investigates the application of Brighton Collaboration case definition to national vaccine safety data related to post-COVID-19 vaccine myo/pericarditis, utilizing claims under the Korea National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NIVCP). METHODS: This study analyzed 190 medical records of individuals who claimed to have developed myo/pericarditis after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, as reported to the NVICP between specified dates, categorizing cases based on the Brighton criteria for myocarditis or pericarditis. RESULTS: Between 2021-2022, NVICP received 190 cases meeting the Brighton criteria for myocarditis or pericarditis at levels 1, 2, or 3. Most cases fell into Level 2 (70%), followed by Level 1 (29%), and one at Level 3 (1%), with Level 1 cases showing a higher hospitalization rate (87.3%) and a notable proportion requiring admission to the Intensive Care Unit (25.5%). Chest pain and Troponin-I/T elevation were common findings in Level 1 cases, while Level 2 cases exhibited similar patterns but at a slightly lower frequency. Electrocardiogram and echocardiography findings differed between the two levels. CONCLUSION: The Brighton Collaboration case definition proved valuable for classifying and assessing AEFI data, enhancing our understanding of the potential relationship between myocarditis and the COVID-19 vaccine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Myocarditis , Pericarditis , Humans , Myocarditis/etiology , Pericarditis/etiology , Republic of Korea , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Male , Adolescent , Female , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/immunology
9.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(8): e76, 2024 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442719

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, several COVID-19 vaccines were licensed with fast-track procedures. Although these vaccines have demonstrated high immunogenicity, there has been concerns on the serious adverse events (AEs) following COVID-19 vaccination among adolescents. We aimed to analyze comparative safety of COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents. METHODS: In this pharmacovigilance study, we performed a disproportionality analysis using VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global individual case safety report (ICSR) database. To compare serious AEs reported following COVID-19 vaccines vs. all other vaccines in adolescents aged 12-17 years, ICSRs following any vaccines on adolescents aged 12-17 years were included, defining cases as reports with the AEs of interest, with all other AEs as non-cases. The AEs of interest were myocarditis/pericarditis, multisystem inflammatory syndrome/Kawasaki disease (MIS/KD), anaphylaxis, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We conducted a disproportionality analysis to estimate reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for each AE of interest, adjusted for sex by using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 99,735 AE reports after vaccination in adolescents, 80,018 reports were from COVID-19 vaccinated adolescents (52.9% females; 56.3% America). The AEs of interest were predominantly reported as serious AE (76.1%) with mRNA vaccines (99.4%). Generally, higher reporting odds for the AEs were identified following COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents; myocarditis/pericarditis (2,829 reports for the COVID-19 vaccine vs. 35 for all other vaccines, adjusted ROR [aROR], 19.61; 95% CI, 14.05-27.39), and MIS/KD (104 vs. 6, aROR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.89-9.88). The reporting odds for anaphylaxis (515 vs. 165, aROR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.02), GBS (94 vs. 40, aROR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.92) and ITP (52 vs. 12, aROR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.59-2.09) were not significantly higher following COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSION: In this study, there were disproportionate reporting of immune-related AEs following COVID-19 vaccination. While awaiting definitive evidence, there is a need to closely monitor for any signs of immune-related AEs following COVID-19 vaccination among adolescents.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Guillain-Barre Syndrome , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome , Myocarditis , Pericarditis , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Anaphylaxis/etiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/epidemiology , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/etiology , Pharmacovigilance , Vaccination/adverse effects
10.
Epidemiol Health ; 46: e2024032, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453334

ABSTRACT

In 2019, a child's death in Korea led to legislation that imposed stricter penalties for school zone traffic violations. We assessed the impact of that legislation using 2017-2022 Traffic Accident Analysis System data. Adjusted analyses revealed a significant decline in severe injuries in school zones, decreasing from 11 cases to 8 cases per month (p=0.017). The legislation correlated with a reduced risk of all child traffic injuries (risk ratio, 0.987; 95% confidence interval, 0.977 to 0.997; p=0.002), indicating its efficacy in curbing accidents.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Schools , Wounds and Injuries , Humans , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Child , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Punishment , Crime/prevention & control , Male , Female , Adolescent
11.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 5354, 2024 03 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38438659

ABSTRACT

The reluctance of parents to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 was prevalent particularly when uncertainty over vaccination outcomes prevailed. We conducted a nationwide randomized online survey experiment to assess the effect of information provision on parental intention for COVID-19 vaccination before the government started vaccination for children in South Korea. Parents of elementary school children were provided with either no information (Control), information on vaccine profile (vaccine informed group; VI), or COVID-19 (disease informed group; DI). Among 359,110 participants, parental intention for vaccination of children was significantly higher in both VI and DI groups compared with the Control group. In terms of effect size, information on COVID-19 vaccine increased likelihood to vaccinate by 1620 per 100,000 parents and reduced vaccine hesitancy by 1340 per 100,000 parents. Consistently with the positive effect on vaccination intention, both VI and DI interventions increased participants' perceptions on vaccination benefits being higher than its risks and vaccination risks being lower than health risks of COVID-19 infection, and self-reported trust in COVID-19 information. Our results lend strong support to the claim that the provision of targeted, tailored information on COVID-19 vaccine and infection increases parental intention to vaccinate children and reduces vaccine hesitancy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Child , Humans , Intention , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Vaccination , Parents
12.
Infect Chemother ; 2024 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527778

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission during the endemic phase may vary from that during the previous pandemic phase. We evaluated the risk of infection in a general population with laboratory-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a community setting in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 1,286 individuals who had been in contact with an index COVID-19 case between January 24, 2020, and June 30, 2022. Variables such as age, sex, nationality, place of contact, level of contact, the status of exposed cases, period, and level of mask-wearing were assessed. RESULTS: Among 1,286 participants, 132 (10.30%) were confirmed to have COVID-19. With increasing age, the risk of the exposed persons contracting COVID-19 from index cases tended to increase (P <0.001), especially for people in their 70s (odds ratio = 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.11 - 1.40, P <0.001). We found an increasing trend in the risk of a COVID-19 exposed case becoming a secondary infection case (P <0.001) in long-term care facilities where the attack rate was high. CONCLUSION: The risk of COVID-19 transmission is high in long-term care facilities where many older adults reside. Intensive management of facilities at risk of infection and strict mask-wearing of confirmed COVID-19 cases are necessary to prevent the risk of COVID-19 infection.

13.
Int J Epidemiol ; 53(1)2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38302750

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the general consensus on the safety of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), safety concerns unveiled during post-licensure surveillance need to be addressed. We investigated whether there is a transient increased risk following a three-dose series of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) administered at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. METHODS: This was a population-based cohort study using the Korea immunization registry data linked to nationwide administrative claims data. Self-controlled risk interval analysis was conducted for PCV recipients who had an outcome of interest within pre-defined risk and control intervals between 2018 and 2022. The outcomes were anaphylaxis, asthma, encephalopathy, febrile seizure, Kawasaki disease and thrombocytopenia. We used conditional Poisson regression model to estimate the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the outcomes in the risk and control intervals. RESULTS: Of 1 114 096 PCV recipients, 8661 had outcomes either in the risk or control intervals. Their mean age at Dose 1 was 10.0 weeks, 58.3% were boys, and 85.3% received 13-valent PCV. PCV was not associated with an increased risk of any outcomes except for febrile seizure. There were 408 (56.0%) cases of febrile seizure in the risk interval, corresponding to an IRR of 1.27 (95% CI 1.10-1.47). CONCLUSIONS: It is reassuring to note that there was no increased risk of the potential safety concerns following PCV administration. Despite the transient increased risk of febrile seizure, absolute numbers of cases were small. Febrile seizure is generally self-limiting with a good prognosis, and should not discourage parents or caregivers from vaccinating their children.


Subject(s)
Pneumococcal Infections , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Seizures, Febrile , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Cohort Studies , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines/adverse effects , Routinely Collected Health Data , Seizures, Febrile/chemically induced , Seizures, Febrile/epidemiology , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines, Conjugate/adverse effects
14.
Vaccine ; 42(7): 1440-1444, 2024 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365479

ABSTRACT

South Korea experienced a low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 until the emergence of the omicron in early 2022, triggering a major community epidemic. To evaluate effectiveness of NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2 vaccines in Korean population, we conducted an observational study utilizing individual-level case data on laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, along with vaccination record. A total of 47,078 recipients of NVX-CoV2373 vaccine and 7,561 recipients of BNT162b2 vaccine were eligible for the study. Thirty days post-second doses, COVID-19 rates were 7.9% (595 out of 7561) of NVX-CoV2373 recipients and 8.6 % (647 out of 7561) of BNT162b2 recipients experienced COVID-19. NVX-CoV2373 rates increased to 9.8 % and 11.2 % at 60 and 90 days, while BNT162b2 rates were 10.5 % and 11.3 % at the same intervals. The 22-weeks risk ratios for recipients of the NVX-CoV2373 vaccine as compared with recipients of the BNT162b2 vaccine were 1.11 (95 % CI, 0.99 to 1.25) for laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Continued monitoring is essential to evaluate the duration of protection across different vaccine platforms and schedules.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , BNT162 Vaccine , SARS-CoV-2 , Breakthrough Infections , Vaccination , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
15.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 43(3): 234-241, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241652

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is generally mild in children; however, severe or critical cases may occur. In this nationwide study, we analyzed clinical manifestations in children diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 to identify high-risk groups for severe or critical disease and compared the clinical features between the Delta- and Omicron-dominant periods. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database and merged with the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency-COVID-19-NHIS cohort, which includes information on COVID-19 cases and vaccination records. We included individuals <20 years old diagnosed with COVID-19 during both periods (Delta: July 25, 2021-January 15, 2022; Omicron: January 16, 2022-March 31, 2022). RESULTS: Proportion of severe or critical cases was higher during the Delta period than during the Omicron period. The Omicron period saw increased hospitalization for pneumonia and croup and increased likelihood of hospitalization for neurological manifestations. The risk of severe COVID-19 depended on age group (Delta: highest for 12-19 years; Omicron: 0-4 years). This risk was high in children with multiple complex chronic conditions during both periods and with obesity or asthma during the Delta but not during the Omicron period. Two-dose COVID-19 vaccination provided strong protection against severe disease in the Delta period (adjusted odds ratio: 0.20), with reduced effectiveness in the Omicron period (adjusted odds ratio: 0.91). However, it significantly reduced the risk of critical illness (adjusted odds ratio: 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: These findings can facilitate identification of children at high risk of severe or critical COVID-19, who may require intensive medical support, and development of vaccination policies.


Subject(s)
Asthma , COVID-19 , Child , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Infect Chemother ; 56(1): 37-46, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38014729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a major global disease burden and the main cause of cervical cancer. Certain HPV genotypes, with are the most common etiologic pathogens and cause a significant disease burden, are being targeted for vaccine development. However, few studies have focused on the comparative effectiveness of the bivalent HPV (2v-HPV), quadrivalent HPV (4v-HPV), and nonavalent HPV (9v-HPV) vaccines against HPV strain-specific infection. This study investigated the comparative effects of these vaccines against genotype-specific infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a pairwise and network meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials of HPV vaccines according to sex and HPV infection status for nine HPV genotypes (HPV 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58). RESULTS: Overall, 10 randomized controlled trials (12 articles) were included in this study. In the network meta-analysis, no statistically significant differences were observed in the prevention of carcinogenic HPV strains (16/18/31/33/45/52/58) between the 2v-HPV and 4v-HPV vaccines in female HPV infection-naïve populations. However, the 9v-HPV vaccine showed a significantly superior effect compared with 2v-HPV and 4v-HPV vaccines in preventing HPV 31/33/45/52/58 infections. Although 2v-HPV and 4v-HPV vaccines provided some cross-protection against HPV 31/33/45/52/58 infections, the effect was significant only on HPV 31 infection. For HPV 16 and 18, neither statistically significant nor small differences were found in the prevention of HPV infection among the 2v-HPV, 4v-HPV, and 9v-HPV vaccines. CONCLUSION: Our study complements previous understanding of how the effect of HPV vaccines differs according to the HPV genotype. This is important because HPV genotype prevalence varies among countries. We advocate for continued efforts in vaccinating against HPV, while public health agencies should consider the difference in the vaccine effect and HPV genotype prevalence when implementing HPV vaccination in public vaccination programs.

17.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 39(2): 625-629, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37880380

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In South Korea, COVID-19 vaccination has been recommended to adolescents aged 12 - 17 since October, 2021. We aimed to assess the rate of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in South Korea, using national cohort data. METHODS: We retrieved the clinical information of adolescents 12 - 17 years old from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency-COVID19-National Health Insurance Service (K-COV-N) database, to calculate incidence rates of purpura and other hemorrhagic conditions, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), Kawasaki disease/multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), myocarditis and/or pericarditis, and anaphylaxis in adolescents with CKD, after BNT162b2 vaccination. RESULTS: Among the 2306 adolescents with CKD, 62.7% (n = 1446) had received the BNT-162b2 vaccine. GBS, Kawasaki disease/MIS-C, and anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock did not occur during the observation period. Purpura and hemorrhagic conditions were more frequent in the unvaccinated group (7/860 vs. 1/1446), while myocarditis/pericarditis was observed only in the vaccinated group (0/860 vs. 1/1446). Adjusted odds ratio for any of the two adverse events was lower in vaccinated adolescents than in the unvaccinated group which did not reach statistical significance (adjusted odds ratio = 0.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.02, 1.16, P = 0.068). CONCLUSIONS: In this national cohort study of adolescents with CKD in South Korea, we observed no evidence of increased risk of adverse events following BNT162b2 vaccination. Our finding offers insights into the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, empowering adolescent patients with CKD and their caregivers to make informed decisions.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome , Myocarditis , Pericarditis , Purpura , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Adolescent , Child , Humans , BNT162 Vaccine , Cohort Studies , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Vaccination/adverse effects
18.
J Korean Med Sci ; 38(46): e396, 2023 Nov 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38013649

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This retrospective observational matched-cohort study of 2,151,216 individuals from the Korean coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness cohort aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the COVID-19 bivalent versus monovalent vaccines in providing additional protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, critical infection, and death in Korea. METHODS: Among individuals, those vaccinated with COVID-19 bivalent vaccines were matched in a 1:1 ratio with those who were vaccinated with monovalent vaccines (bivalent vaccines non-recipients) during the observation period. We fitted a time-dependent Cox proportional-hazards model to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of COVID-19 outcomes for infection, critical infection, and death, and we defined vaccine effectiveness (VE) as 1-HR. RESULTS: Compared with the bivalent vaccination group, the incidence proportions in the monovalent vaccination group were approximately three times higher for infection, nine times higher for critical infection, and 11 times higher for death. In the early stage of bivalent vaccination, relative VE of bivalent vaccine against monovalent vaccine was 42.4% against SARS-CoV-2 infection, 81.3% against critical infection, and 85.3% against death. In addition, VE against critical infection and death according to the elapsed period after bivalent vaccination was maintained at > 70%. CONCLUSION: The bivalent booster dose provided additional protection against SARS-CoV-2 infections, critical infections, and deaths during the omicron variant phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Cohort Studies , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Vaccination , COVID-19 Vaccines , Vaccines, Combined , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
19.
J Korean Med Sci ; 38(41): e314, 2023 Oct 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37873626

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the risk of maternal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and early abortive outcomes after the association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination during the preconceptional period and preclinical pregnancy, which are likely to be inadvertent vaccination. METHODS: We used data from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency-COVID19-National Health Insurance Service cohort from December 2020 to December 2021. The vaccinated pregnant women were matched to unvaccinated pregnant controls at a 1:4 ratio. The risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and intensive care unit (ICU) admission within 14 days of infection were analyzed to assess its effectiveness. For safety measures, the adjusted relative risks (aRRs) of early abortive outcomes for the first COVID-19 vaccination during the preconceptional and preclinical periods were calculated considering covariates. We compared the risk of early abortion between mRNA and viral vector vaccines. RESULTS: The overall COVID-19 vaccination rates during the preconceptional period and preclinical pregnancy were 3.1% (6,662/215,211) and 2.6% (5,702/215,211), respectively. The cumulative incidence of ICU admission within 14 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 6/100,000 in the unvaccinated group, whereas there were no ICU admissions in the vaccinated groups. The risks of early abortive outcomes were not significantly different between the preconceptional vaccination group and the unvaccinated group (aRR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI],0.99-1.10) or between preclinical pregnancy vaccination and their matched controls (1.02; 95% CI, 0.96-1.08). mRNA and viral vector vaccines have shown similar risks for early abortive outcomes and miscarriages. CONCLUSION: Our findings have provided compelling evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccination prior to and during early pregnancy. Further research is required to extend the safety and efficacy profiles of COVID-19 vaccines to pregnant women and their babies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Infant , Pregnancy , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
20.
J Korean Med Sci ; 38(42): e315, 2023 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37904653

ABSTRACT

This was a cross-sectional study using the data collected from a nationwide survey between November and December 2022 to explore factors associated with hesitancy towards coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination for children. Among 3,011 participants with child aged 5-11 years, 82.5% demonstrated hesitancy towards vaccinating their child. This was more common among mothers (odds ratio 1.84 [95% confidence interval 1.46-2.31]), those residing outside metropolitan area (urban: 2.46 [1.89-3.20]; rural: 2.87 [2.09-3.93]) or with history of COVID-19 diagnosis (2.22 [1.78-2.76]). Parents were also hesitant if their child recently had COVID-19 (3.41 [2.67-4.37]). Conversely, they were less likely to be hesitant if they had three or more children (0.66 [0.46-0.94]) or if their child has underlying medical condition(s) (0.54 [0.41-0.71]). Our findings highlight high prevalence of parental hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccination for children, and call for targeted outreach efforts from the stakeholders to facilitate the vaccine uptake in this pediatric population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Child , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Testing , Cross-Sectional Studies , Parents , Vaccination , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...