Draping in Dermatology: A Physician's Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Patient dignity is a core component of medicine and health care, yet maintaining patient dignity can be challenging in clinical settings in dermatology, specifically during a total body skin examinations (TBSE) for appropriate assessment and diagnosis. A recent study evaluated patient perspectives in dermatology. The purpose of this study was to investigate current draping practices and perspectives from a physicians' perspective. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed with the use of study-specific questionnaire distributed to staff dermatologists and dermatology residents across Canada. RESULTS: A total of 117 physicians were included (84 attending dermatologists and 33 dermatology residents). Nearly all staff and resident dermatologists (90.6%) indicated that draping was important. Specific practices differed between residents and staff (P = .03). Only 3.1% of residents indicated that they did not receive any form of teaching on draping during their training compared to 21.4% of attending physicians (P = .03). DISCUSSION: This study confirms that draping practices in dermatology are perceived as important by dermatologists, consistent with other reports emphasizing approaches to protect patient privacy and dignity. There is a shared value for draping and consistent integration of this within current practice of Canadian dermatologists. Formal and informal education incorporated in medical education and dermatology training is becoming more prominent. Major study limitations include sampling bias, convenience bias and nonresponse bias. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate physician perspectives on draping in dermatology or other areas in medicine. Findings from this study support a focus on draping in medical education.

Anxiety, depression, and sleep-related outcomes of glaucoma patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to synthesize data quantifying the prevalence and severity of common psychological conditions in patients with glaucoma. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Databases including Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Open Grey, and ProQuest Theses and dissertations were searched. Two reviewers independently assessed and screened all studies, followed by quality assessment of included studies using the modified Downs and Black checklist. Data were pooled using fixed-effect and random-effects models. RESULTS: Of 2067 studies identified by the search strategy, 57 passed full-text screening, and 45 studies (4 995 538 subjects) were eligible for analysis. Overall, the prevalence of depression (effect size [ES] = 0.19, 95% CI 0.16-0.23; n = 31), anxiety (ES = 0.25, 95% CI 0.21-0.30; n = 18), and sleep disorders (ES = 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.68; n = 7) were high in patients with glaucoma. Similarly, symptomatic measurements of depression (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.46, 95% CI 0.19-0.73), anxiety (SMD = 0.44, 95% CI 0.08-0.81), and sleep quality (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI 0.22-1.21) were significant in glaucoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: A higher prevalence and severity of depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders was experienced in patients with glaucoma compared with patients without glaucoma. Caregivers as well as health care providers may need to be aware of unique psychological and social stressors placed on glaucoma patients.

Draping in Dermatology: A Patient's Perspective.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Patient dignity is a core component of the Canadian health care system; however, there may be challenges to maintaining patient dignity in clinical settings requiring total body skin examination (TBSE) for adequate assessment and diagnosis. As standardized TBSE draping practices have not been investigated in a dermatology setting, we sought out to investigate subjective patient experiences of draping practices. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed using a paper survey in dermatology hospital clinics over a 6-month period to 150 patients. RESULTS: Draping was considered important by over 50% of patients surveyed (54.7%). Respondents who indicated that draping impacted their comfort level "a lot" or "very much" had a mean age of 52 and were more likely to be females (P < .05). Females were also more likely to answer that their body weight/shape (P < .05), physician of same (P < .01) or opposite sex (P < .001), and the degree of privacy offered by drapes (P < .001) impacted their comfort level when undressing for a TBSE. Respondents who reported that any assessed factor impacted their comfort during a TBSE were also younger (P < .05), suggesting that younger and female patients were more likely to have comfort concerns than males. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that most patients surveyed considered draping to be important. Our findings highlight the importance of adequate draping practices to maintain patient privacy and dignity for all patients, with special attention to younger female patients to ensure they feel as comfortable as possible. Future research should focus on how these identified patient comfort factors can be implemented into medical education.