Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Chim Acta ; 554: 117755, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38182077

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reverse transcription real-time PCR (rRT-PCR) has been a gold-standard method to detect SARS-CoV-2, for which quality assessment of nucleic acids (NAs) is not needed. In order to prepare for future use, we evaluated NA quality from archived SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR samples. METHODS: NA samples were collected in February 2021 and extracted using the QIAamp DSP Virus Spin Kit, (53 SARS-CoV-2-positive and 100 SARS-CoV-2-negative). Quality, quantity, and purity of NA were measured spectrophotometrically or fluorescently. Droplet digital PCR was used to characterize the double strand DNA (dsDNA) origin and composition by quantifying 16S rDNA and RPP30. RESULTS: The RIN and purity were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.3828). RNA quantity was significantly higher than dsDNA in both groups (p < 0.0001); both dsDNA and RNA quantity were significantly higher in positive samples (dsDNA, RNA p = 0.021). For dsDNA, 16S rDNA copies were significantly greater than RPP30 in both groups (p < 0.0001), and RPP30 were significantly higher in positive samples (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Archived NA quality after SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR was guaranteed for subsequent molecular research using human or bacterial DNA, especially for short targets.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nucleic Acids , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/diagnosis , RNA, Viral/genetics , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , DNA, Ribosomal , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...