Small bowel ulcer bleeding due to suspected clopidogrel use in a patient with clopidogrel resistance: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel is a platelet aggregation inhibitor used for the management of cardiovascular disease. While antiplatelet therapy decreases cardiovascular events after successful coronary drug-eluting stenting, it increases the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. About 20% of the patients who take clopidogrel exhibit resistance to the drug. CASE SUMMARY: We report the first case of a small bowel bleeding ulcer in an 86-year-old man with clopidogrel resistance. He had a history of taking clopidogrel due to unstable angina. There was no evidence of bleeding in the stomach, duodenum, or colon through upper and lower GI endoscopies. The abdominal computed tomography showed the extravasation of radiocontrast media at the ileum. Because of unstable vital signs, emergency surgery was performed. Multiple ulcers with inflammation were found in the ileum. The pathologic findings revealed simple inflammation. The VerifyNow P2Y12 test showed clopidogrel resistance. One year after changing to aspirin, capsule endoscopy was performed and the small bowel ulcers were improved. CONCLUSION: Small bowel ulcers and bleeding due to clopidogrel are not very common, but the prevalence is expected to increase in older age patients with risk factors despite clopidogrel resistance.

Horseshoe appendix identified during laparoscopic appendectomy: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: The horseshoe anomaly of the vermiform appendix is extremely rare. Preoperative confirmation of this anomaly is difficult; therefore, routine procedures, such as appendectomy, may become unexpectedly challenging when such anomalies are encountered during the surgical process. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 33-year-old man presented with abdominal pain in the right lower abdomen owing to acute appendicitis confirmed via computed tomography. Immediate laparoscopic appendectomy was decided as the method for treatment. DIAGNOSIS: Horseshoe anomaly was diagnosed as a gross finding during surgery. INTERVENTION: First, the appendiceal base was resected and appendectomy was performed via the retrograde method because the appendiceal tip was curled behind the cecum. However, it was discovered that the appendiceal tip was connected to the lateral part of the ascending colon and showed a horseshoe-shaped anomaly. The second appendiceal base arising from the ascending colon was also ligated, and the appendectomy was completed without any further complications. OUTCOMES: After successful completion of appendectomy, the patient was discharged without any complications 2 days later. LESSONS: An appendiceal anomaly is rarely seen during appendectomy or other forms of abdominal surgery; however, the ability of surgeons to both recognize and categorize an appendiceal anomaly is crucial if detected during surgery. After successfully recognizing the horseshoe anomaly of the appendix, it is important to know that 2 appendiceal base ligations will be required to complete the surgery successfully.

Solitary colonic metastasis from primary lung adenocarcinoma first presenting as intestinal obstruction: A case report.

RATIONALE: The brain, liver, adrenal glands, and bone are the most common sites of metastatic disease in patients with lung cancer. Symptomatic gastrointestinal metastases are rare. In the present report, we describe a rare case of a patient with intestinal obstruction due to solitary colonic metastasis from primary lung adenocarcinoma, wherein the intestinal obstruction was the first symptom of lung cancer. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 74-year-old man was admitted to the emergency room with abdominal pain and vomiting, and abdominal computed tomography (CT) indicated obstruction of the ascending colon due to a huge mass. DIAGNOSIS: The ascending colon cancer was found to be a metastatic adenocarcinoma based on the results of the pathology report. Chest CT and positron emission tomography-CT were performed to identify the cancer origin site. Moreover, immunohistochemical staining of the tissue specimen for thyroid transcription factor 1, cytokeratin 7 (CK7), and CK20 and CT-guided gun biopsy of the lung mass confirmed the presence of an adenocarcinoma that originated from the lung. INTERVENTION: Right hemicolectomy was performed as the primary treatment. OUTCOMES: The patient recovered without any problems due to the surgery itself. However, malignant pleural effusion deteriorated, and no additional palliative chemotherapy was performed. LESSONS: Patients with malignant bowel obstruction along with lung infiltration should be suspected of not only colon cancer with lung metastasis, but also lung cancer with colon metastasis.

Initial experience of transanal total mesorectal excision with rigid or flexible transanal platforms in cadavers.

BACKGROUND: Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is expected to provide benefits in the removal of the complete mesorectum for low rectal lesions, and several clinical studies regarding this technique have been reported. However, a transanal platform has not yet been standardized, and diverse transanal endoluminal surgery access devices have been used, based on individual surgeon preferences. In the present study, we performed laparoscopy-assisted taTME in cadavers and compared the characteristics of four different platforms. METHODS: Between January 2013 and April 2015, laparoscopy-assisted taTME was performed on six fresh cadavers. Flexible [SILS™ Port (Covidien), GelPOINT(®) Path Transanal Access Platform (Applied Medical)] and rigid [TEO(®) (Karl Storz Endoskope), TEM (Richard Wolf)] transanal access platforms were used on three cadavers each. RESULTS: All cadavers were male, with a mean age of 69.2 (range 57-86) years. The mean operation time was 146.3 (range 140-155) min with flexible platforms and 206.7 (range 150-260) min with rigid platforms. The mean specimen length was 23 (range 18-26) cm. Complete or nearly complete mesorectal specimens were obtained in all cases, except for one case using the TEM platform. Flexible platforms (SILS and GelPOINT) provided a short set-up time, relatively atraumatic retraction, and easy application of familiar laparoscopic instruments; a narrow operative field was its limitation. The rigid platforms (TEO and TEM) enabled larger and more stable operative fields and space than did the SILS platform, but they were limited by a narrow view, prolonged set-up time, rigidity, and long channels relative to the short distance from the anus to the rectal closure site. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, laparoscopy-assisted taTME was a feasible and safe procedure using both rigid and soft platforms, despite some limitations of each platform.

Survival paradox between stage IIB/C (T4N0) and stage IIIA (T1-2N1) colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: The survival paradox between stage IIB/C (T4N0) and stage IIIA (T1-2N1) colon cancer remains in the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. This multicenter study aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes of T4N0 and T1-2N1 colon cancers and to investigate the presumptive prognostic factors that might influence the survival paradox. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative surgery for pT4N0 (n = 224) and pT1-2N1 (n = 135) primary colon cancer between January 1999 and December 2010 at five tertiary referral cancer centers were included for analysis. The clinicopathologic, treatment-related factors, and oncologic outcomes in terms of the 5-year overall survival (5-OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (5-DFS) were compared. RESULTS: The T4N0 group had significantly worse 5-OS and 5-DFS rates than the T1-2N1 group (5-OS: 84.0 vs. 92.3 %, p = 0.012; 5-DFS: 73.6 vs. 88.0 %, p = 0.001). T4N0 cancers more frequently showed elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, lower grade of differentiation, larger tumor size, and higher proportions of perineural invasion, microsatellite instability, obstruction, and perforation than T1-2N1 cancers. Peritoneal seeding and liver metastasis were the predominant recurrence pattern in the T4N0 and T1-2N1 groups, respectively (p = 0.042). The T4N0 group showed inferior survival to the T1-2N1 group in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (5-OS: 87.1 vs. 93.2 %, p = 0.045; 5-DFS: 76.1 vs. 89.0 %, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: T4N0 colon cancer had significantly worse oncologic outcomes than T1-2N1 cancer regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. The survival paradox may result from the biologic aggressiveness of T4N0 colon carcinomas.