ABSTRACT
ChulaCov19 mRNA vaccine demonstrated promising phase 1 results. Healthy adults aged 18-59 years were double-blind randomised 4:1 to receive two intramuscular doses of ChulaCov19 50 µg or placebo. Primary endpoints were safety and microneutralization antibody against-wild-type (Micro-VNT50) at day 50. One hundred fifty adults with median (IQR) age 37 (30-46) years were randomised. ChulaCov19 was well tolerated, and most adverse events were mild to moderate and temporary. Geometric mean titres (GMT) of neutralizing titre against wild-type for ChulaCov19 on day 50 were 1367 IU/mL. T-cell IFN-γ-ELISpot showed the highest responses at one week (Day29) after dose 2 then gradually declined. ChulaCov19 50 µg is well tolerated and elicited high neutralizing antibodies and strong T-cell responses in healthy adults.Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04566276, 28/09/2020.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , mRNA Vaccines , Adolescent , Young AdultABSTRACT
HER-2 overexpression is a major mechanism involved in endocrine-resistant breast cancer, which has very limited treatment options. Zoledronic acid (ZA) is a drug in the bisphosphonate group used to treat osteoporosis. ZA was reported to exhibit activity in various cancers, with higher efficacy associated with estrogen-deprivation states. ZA inhibits cell proliferation in lung cancer through the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway. Because endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells overexpress HER-2 and grow independently without estrogen, ZA may exert anticancer effects in these cell types. The inhibitory effects and mechanisms of ZA in endocrine-resistant cells through HER-2 signaling were investigated. The efficacy of ZA was higher in the endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells when compared with the wild-type cells. ZA also exhibited a synergistic effect with fulvestrant and may circumvent fulvestrant resistance. ZA decreased phosphorylated ERK (pERK) levels in resistant cell lines and attenuated HER-2 signaling in tamoxifen- and fulvestrant-resistant cells. ZA significantly decreased HER-2 levels and its downstream signaling molecules, including pAKT and pNF-κB in fulvestrant-resistant breast cancer cells. This inhibitory effect may explain the lower IC50 values of ZA in fulvestrant-resistant cells compared with tamoxifen-resistant cells. Moreover, ZA inhibited the migration and invasion in the resistant cell lines, suggesting an ability to inhibit tumor metastasis. The results indicate that ZA has potential for repurposing as an adjuvant treatment for patients with endocrine-resistant breast cancer.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Breast Neoplasms , Zoledronic Acid , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Estrogens/pharmacology , Fulvestrant/pharmacology , Fulvestrant/therapeutic use , Signal Transduction , Tamoxifen/pharmacology , Zoledronic Acid/pharmacology , Zoledronic Acid/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) can be disrupted by a severe complication, anti-rHuEPO-induced pure red cell aplasia (PRCA). Specific HLA genotypes may have played a role in the high incidence of PRCA in Thai patients (1.7/1,000 patient years vs. 0.03/10,000 patient years in Caucasians). We conducted a case-control study in 157 CKD patients with anti-rHuEPO-induced PRCA and 56 controls. The HLA typing was determined by sequencing using a highly accurate multiplex single-molecule, real-time, long-read sequencing platform. Four analytical models were deployed: Model 1 (additive: accounts for the number of alleles), Model 2 (dominant: accounts for only the presence or absence of alleles), Model 3 (adjusted additive with rHuEPO types) and Model 4 (adjusted dominant with rHuEPO types). HLA-B*46:01:01:01 and DRB1*09:01:02:01 were found to be independent risk markers for anti-rHuEPO-induced PRCA in all models [OR (95%CI), p-values for B*46:01:01:01: 4.58 (1.55-13.51), 0.006; 4.63 (1.56-13.75), 0.006; 5.72 (1.67-19.67), 0.006; and 5.81 (1.68-20.09), 0.005; for DRB1*09:01:02:01: 3.99 (1.28-12.49), 0.017, 4.50 (1.32-15.40), 0.016, 3.42 (1.09-10.74), 0.035, and 3.75 (1.08-13.07), 0.038, in Models 1-4, respectively. HLA-B*46:01:01:01 and DRB1*09:01:02:01 are susceptible alleles for anti-rHuEPO-induced PRCA. These findings support the role of HLA genotyping in helping to monitor patients receiving rHuEPO treatment.
