ABSTRACT
In this study, we assessed the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of two therapeutic regimens relating to the frequency of zoledronic acid (ZOL) infusion. Sixty adult patients with bone metastases were randomly assigned to two study groups. The first group (group A) received 4 mg ZOL every two weeks, and the second group (group B) received 4 mg ZOL every four weeks. Assessment measures included C-telopeptide (CTX) rate, the Greek Brief Pain Inventory (GBPI), the linear analogue scale assessment (LASA) of quality of life, and biochemical markers. Assessments were made at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48. Clinical endpoints included effective decrease in bone resorption markers, pain relief and improvement of mobility status. The follow-up period was 48 weeks. No statistically significant differences between groups A and B were found in overall profile of biochemical markers, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and GBPI score at the end of the follow-up period. Assessment of bone metastases revealed a slight difference between the two groups, however this difference was not statistically significant. These findings indicate that administering zoledronic acid at four rather that two weeks has no significant impact on overall outcome.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Bone Resorption/drug therapy , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Palliative Care/methods , Aged , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Neoplasms/complications , Bone Resorption/etiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Zoledronic AcidABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and improvement in quality of life (QOL) of epoetin alfa administration supplemented with oral iron as a therapeutic regimen for patients with solid malignancies and anemia of chronic disease (ACD), not receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients with cancer-related anemia, not subjected to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, were randomized to receive for a maximum of 24 weeks either oral iron, equivalent to 200 mg elemental iron once daily, or epoetin alfa 40,000 IU subcutaneously once weekly plus oral iron once daily. RESULTS: Patients in the epoetin alfa group had, from baseline to study end, a mean increase in hemoglobin (Hb) levels of 2.4 g/dL, whereas in the control group the mean Hb level decreased by 0.1 g/dL, (p<0.001). Improvement in QOL as assessed by the LASA and the FACT-An questionnaire were greater in patients in the epoetin alfa group than in the control group (mean change, LASA-energy level: 30.4 mm vs. 0.4 mm, -daily activities: 31.7 mm vs. 0.4 mm, -overall well-being. 32.4 mm vs. 4.9, FACT-An: 43.3 vs. 13.4, respectively). As for ECOG score, patients in the epoetin alfa group had a mean improvement of 0.16 from baseline to study end (control group: 0.06). Improvement in QOL parameters and in ECOG scores correlated positively with increased hemoglobin levels. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that weekly epoetin alfa therapy supplemented with daily oral iron increases Hb levels and improves QOL in patients with solid malignancies and ACD who are not receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. This regimen offers optimal therapy in this population taking into consideration physician's convenience and patient's compliance.
