Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Endourol ; 35(12): 1738-1742, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34036805

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective procedure for removal of large kidney stones; however, PCNL has traditionally been reserved for inpatient surgery. Certain cases are being performed entirely at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC), known as ambulatory PCNL (aPCNL). Materials and Methods: Five hundred consecutive PCNL procedures performed at a free-standing ASC between April 2015 and February 2019 were analyzed. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, operative characteristics, and postoperative data, including transfer to hospitals, 30-day readmissions, and complications > Clavien I, were recorded. Results: The mean age of patients undergoing PCNL at the ASC was 57 (range: 16-86) and body mass index 30 (16-49). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) compositions are as follows: ASA 1 (6.5%), ASA 2 (56.2%), ASA 3 (37.2%), and ASA 4 (0. 1%). The mean stone burden was 30 mm (5-140). Standard tract dilation (24-30F) comprised 77% of cases. Ninety-two percent of cases were performed with a single tract, and 99% of cases had a ureteral stent as the only form of drainage (tubeless PCNL). The mean operative time was 104 minutes (32-305), and postanesthesia care unit time was 97 minutes (37-247). The predicted stone-free rate was 84%. Twelve patients (2.4%) required transfer to hospital, and the 30-day readmission rate was 4.2%. Conclusion: aPCNL is a safe and feasible procedure if performed by a high volume endourologist, even within the confines of a free-standing ASC. It is our opinion that the utilization of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery facilitates high stone-free rates with minimal morbidity and low readmission rates. The institutional review board number is WIRB # 20171472.


Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous , Ureter , Humans , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Patient Readmission , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Ther Adv Urol ; 10(12): 383-391, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30574198

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare overall survival (OS) and unplanned hospital readmissions (UHRs) within 30 days between partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for clinically localized T1 renal tumors. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify 51,018 patients who had undergone RN (n = 23,904; 46.9%) or PN (n = 27,114; 53.1%) for a cT1N0M0 renal mass from 2004 to 2013. OS and UHRs were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW)-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: For patients with a cT1a tumor, IPTW-adjusted analysis showed PN compared with RN was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.56, 0.67; p < 0.001) with a 5-year and 10-year IPTW-adjusted OS of 93.0% versus 88.2% and 78.1% versus 71.7%, respectively with no difference in UHR (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.90, 1.16; p = 0.727). For patients with a cT1b tumor, IPTW-adjusted analysis showed PN compared with RN to be associated with marginally improved OS (HR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.82, 0.99; p = 0.025) with a 5-year and 10-year IPTW-adjusted OS of 85.3% versus 84.3% and 70.8% versus 63.6%, respectively, with more UHRs for PN (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.19, 1.72; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PN compared with RN was associated with a significant survival benefit for patients with a cT1a renal mass and a modest survival benefit for patients with a cT1b renal mass. PN should be offered over RN when feasible despite a marginal increase in UHRs for PN of cT1b tumors. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

3.
Onco Targets Ther ; 11: 2141-2147, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29695920

ABSTRACT

Advances in therapies have led to the approval of six therapeutic agents since 2004, each demonstrating overall survival benefit in randomized studies, and these have significantly improved the outlook for men facing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). More recently, efforts have been directed at trying to effect change at earlier phases of the disease. Apalutamide (ARN-509), a second-generation androgen receptor antagonist, recently received approval in the nonmetastatic (M0) CRPC space. Similar to enzalutamide, apalutamide inhibits the binding of androgen to androgen receptor (AR), nuclear translocation of the androgen-AR complex, and binding of AR transcription complex to DNA-binding sites and transcription elements. Phase I and II trial experience demonstrates the safety and tolerability of apalutamide, as well as its efficacy in effecting prostate-specific antigen response and radiographic-free survival in CRPC. US Food and Drug Administration approval in M0 CRPC was granted following positive results from the phase III SPARTAN study, where apalutamide demonstrated significant improvements in metastasis-free survival and time to symptomatic progression as compared to placebo.

4.
Investig Clin Urol ; 59(2): 119-125, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29520388

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Placement of pre-operative ureteral catheters for colorectal surgery can aid in the identification of ureteral injuries. This study investigates whether simultaneous ureteral catheterization with surgery skin preparation can minimize operating room times without increasing post-operative complications. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing simultaneous colorectal surgery skin preparation and placement of pre-operative ureteral catheters (n=21) were compared to those who underwent these events sequentially (n=28). Operative time-points of anesthesia ready (AR), surgery procedure start (PS), dorsal lithotomy and catheter insertion (CI) times were compared to assess for differences between groups. Complications were compared between groups. Results: There were no differences in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), comorbidities, current procedure terminology (CPT) or International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9) codes between groups. Simultaneous catheterization saved 11.82 minutes of operative time between CI to PS (p=0.005, t-test). There was a significant difference in mean time between CI to PS (11.82 minutes, p=0.008) between simultaneous and sequential ureteral catheterization groups in a linear regression multivariate analysis controlling for age, BMI, CPT and ICD-9 codes. There were 4 complications in the simultaneous (19%) and 3 in the sequential group (11%) (p=0.68). Conclusions: Ureteral catheterization and colorectal surgery skin preparation in a simultaneous fashion decreases the time between CI and PS without significant increase in complications. Mean time saved with simultaneous ureteral catheterization was 11.82 minutes per case. Simultaneous ureteral catheterization may be an option in colorectal surgery and may result in cost savings without additional complications.


Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases , Colorectal Surgery , Postoperative Complications , Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Catheters , Adult , Colonic Diseases/epidemiology , Colonic Diseases/surgery , Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects , Colorectal Surgery/instrumentation , Colorectal Surgery/methods , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Preoperative Care/methods , United States/epidemiology , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Urinary Catheterization/methods
5.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 37(3): 1169-1175, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29053886

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To describe the historical changes from antiquity until present in the presentation and treatment of male urinary incontinence. METHODS: A literature review of PubMed articles in English pertaining to male incontinence was performed. RESULTS: Male urinary incontinence was first mentioned in Egyptian manuscripts in 1500 B.C. In 1564, Ambroise Pare designed portable urinals for incontinent males. Wilhem Hildanus created the first condom catheter with pig bladder in the 1600s and was also credited with fashioning the first penile clamp. Lorenz Heister introduced a perineal bulbar urethral compression belt in 1747 which would provide the blueprint for air-inflated bulbar urethral compression devices such as the one designed by S.A. Vincent in 1960. Robert Gersuny performed the first periurethral paraffin injection bulking therapy in the late 19th century. In 1929, Frederic Foley introduced the modern catheter, and also credited with conception of the first artificial sphincter. From 1970 to 1973, Joseph Kaufman surgically created bulbar compression for post-prostatectomy incontinence, but not before designing the first male sling with John Berry in 1958. In 1973, F. Brantley Scott introduced the first multi-component artificial inflatable sphincter. Improvements upon periurethral bulking therapy occurred rapidly in the late 20th century with Teflon, collagen, autologous adipose, tissue and cross-linked silicone gels. Since 2007, stem cell injection therapy has emerged as a new therapeutic option for incontinence; however, results are mixed and remains experimental. CONCLUSION: Treatment for male urinary incontinence has evolved from noninvasive devices to various surgical procedures. Artificial sphincters remain the gold-standard therapy for male urinary incontinence.


Subject(s)
Suburethral Slings , Urethra/physiopathology , Urinary Incontinence/therapy , Urinary Sphincter, Artificial , Animals , Humans , Injections , Male , Prostatectomy , Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Incontinence/physiopathology
6.
J Spinal Cord Med ; 38(2): 187-92, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24621035

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the safety, efficacy, quality-of-life impact, and costs of a single dose or a longer course of pre-procedural antibiotics prior to elective endoscopic urological procedures in individuals with spinal cord injury and disorders (SCI/D) and asymptomatic bacteriuria. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty persons with SCI/D and asymptomatic bacteriuria scheduled to undergo elective endoscopic urological procedures. INTERVENTIONS: A single pre-procedural dose of antibiotics vs. a 3-5-day course of pre-procedural antibiotics. OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective and subjective measures of health, costs, and quality of life. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in vital signs, leukocytosis, adverse events, and overall satisfaction in individuals who received short-course vs. long-course antibiotics. There was a significant decrease in antibiotic cost (33.1 ± 47.6 vs. 3.6 ± 6.1 US$, P = 0.01) for individuals in the short-course group. In addition, there was greater pre-procedural anxiety (18 vs. 0%, P < 0.05) for individuals who received long-course antibiotics. CONCLUSION: SCI/D individuals with asymptomatic bacteriuria may be able to safely undergo most endoscopic urological procedures with a single dose of pre-procedural antibiotics. However, further research is required and even appropriate pre-procedural antibiotics may not prevent severe infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteriuria/prevention & control , Cystoscopy/methods , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/surgery , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Cystoscopy/adverse effects , Cystoscopy/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Preoperative Care , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/diagnosis , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/etiology
7.
Can J Urol ; 21(5): 7433-41, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25347367

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have adequately addressed the indications, efficacy, and quality-of-life for cystectomy performed for non-malignant bladder conditions. Patients with debilitating non-malignant bladder conditions who have failed all previous conservative therapies may undergo various forms of cystectomy, including partial, simple or radical cystectomy. We provide a review of the current literature and recommendations for cystectomy for various non-malignant bladder conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE was conducted to find prospective and retrospective studies using the keywords "cystectomy", "benign", and `non-malignant`. Articles were reviewed and triaged, background articles were added as supplements, leaving a final review of 67 papers. RESULTS: Data from the final review suggests that common benign indications for cystectomy are interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS), neurogenic bladder, hemorrhagic/radiation cystitis, infectious diseases of the bladder and miscellaneous conditions of the bladder such as endometriosis and total refractory incontinence. The most common perioperative complications include urinary tract and wound infections. Efficacy of cystectomy in patients with IC/PBS is greater than 80%, while efficacy in patients with neurogenic bladder is greater than 90%. Finally, improved urinary quality-of-life has been demonstrated in patients with neurogenic bladder post-cystectomy. CONCLUSION: Cystectomy for non-malignant conditions can be considered for patients who have failed previous conservative therapy. The limited data in existence suggests fertility can be adequately preserved after cystectomy in younger males. The data regarding the forms of urinary diversion suggests no significant advantage between any of the major forms of urinary diversion. Finally, while newer pharmacologics and technological advances are widely used in the treatment of various benign urological conditions, their role in preventing or treating refractory benign bladder conditions have not been fully characterized.


Subject(s)
Cystectomy , Cystitis, Interstitial/surgery , Radiation Injuries/surgery , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/surgery , Urinary Bladder/radiation effects , Cystectomy/adverse effects , Cystitis/complications , Cystitis/surgery , Endometriosis/surgery , Female , Fertility Preservation , Hematuria/etiology , Humans , Male , Patient Selection , Quality of Life , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Urinary Diversion , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Urinary Tract Infections/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...