Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Singapore Med J ; 50(10): e353-7, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19907874

ABSTRACT

Loeys-Dietz syndrome is a recently-characterised genetic disorder with an autosomal-dominant inheritance due to mutations in the transforming growth factor beta-receptor Type 1 or Type 2 genes. We present a Chinese female neonate with genetically-confirmed Loeys-Dietz syndrome, cleft palate, hypertelorism, and an early dilatation of the aortic root and ascending aorta. This syndrome is associated with an aggressive arteriopathy, with an increased risk of dissection and rupture. Early diagnosis, close monitoring and early surgery may prolong the life in affected individuals. Losartan is an emerging therapy that may help slow down the rate of arterial dilatation.


Subject(s)
Loeys-Dietz Syndrome/diagnosis , Marfan Syndrome/diagnosis , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Aortic Aneurysm/diagnosis , Aortic Aneurysm/drug therapy , Echocardiography/methods , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Loeys-Dietz Syndrome/drug therapy , Losartan/therapeutic use , Marfan Syndrome/drug therapy , Risk , Time Factors , Transforming Growth Factor beta/metabolism
2.
Singapore Med J ; 45(2): 75-8, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14985846

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Active Hearing Defenders are established hearing protectors with in-built electro-acoustics that shut-off ambient noise while allowing effective communication between users. METHODS: A blinded, self-controlled trial was conducted among naval servicemen to compare the effectiveness of two types of active hearing defenders (Howard-Leight Thunder TM and COM-55) in relation to passive hearing defenders in an operational environment. RESULTS: Subjects felt that the active hearing defenders were more comfortable, durable, and that the active hearing defenders helped them work better. When subjects were tested with a speech discrimination battery (Central Institute of the Deaf, Spondee Word lists), there was a significant difference (p value of 0.04, using the Kruskall-Wallis ANOVA test) between the two active and the passive defenders. However, no significant difference was found between the two types of active hearing defenders. CONCLUSION: Active hearing defenders are an acceptable and efficacious means of hearing protection in noisy environments.


Subject(s)
Ear Protective Devices , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/prevention & control , Military Personnel , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Adult , Humans , Male , Ships , Singapore , Speech Discrimination Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...