Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Compend Contin Educ Dent ; 44(3): 136-140; quiz 141, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36878256

ABSTRACT

The success of dental implants has long been considered to be dependent primarily on the quality and quantity of alveolar bone. Bone grafting allows patients with insufficient bone volume to obtain implant-supported prosthetic solutions for treatment of edentulism. While extensive bone grafting procedures have been commonly used to rehabilitate severely atrophic arches, they can be associated with long treatment times, unpredictability, and donor site morbidity. Nongrafting solutions have more recently been employed that maximally utilize the residual highly atrophic alveolar or extra-alveolar bone for implant therapy. With the use of modern diagnostic imaging and 3D printing technology, clinicians are able to provide individualized, subperiosteal implants that fully adapt to the patient's remaining alveolar bone. Other "graftless" implants, including zygomatic implants, utilize the patient's extraoral facial bone outside the alveolar process and have been shown to provide predictable results. This article discusses the rationale for graftless solutions in implant therapy and the data supporting the use of various graftless protocols as alternatives to grafting and conventional dental implant therapy.


Subject(s)
Orthognathic Surgery , Humans , Esthetics, Dental , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Alveolar Process , Atrophy
2.
Compend Contin Educ Dent ; 44(2): 74-79; quiz 80, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36802747

ABSTRACT

For many decades the success of dental implants has been considered to be dependent predominantly on the quality and quantity of the patient's alveolar bone. Building on the high success rates of implants, bone grafting eventually was implemented, allowing patients with insufficient bone volume to obtain implant-supported prosthetic solutions for treatment of partial or complete edentulism. Extensive bone grafting procedures have been commonly used to rehabilitate severely atrophic arches but are associated with long treatment times, unpredictability, and donor site morbidity. More recently, nongrafting solutions that maximally utilize the residual highly atrophic alveolar or extra-alveolar bone for implant therapy have been reported to have success. The emergence of diagnostic imaging and 3D printing technology has allowed clinicians to provide individualized, subperiosteal implants that can adapt precisely to the patient's remaining alveolar bone. Furthermore, paranasal, pterygoid, and zygomatic implants that utilize the patient's extraoral facial bone outside the alveolar process can provide predictable and optimal results with no or minimal bone grafting with less treatment time. This article considers and evaluates the rationale for graftless solutions in implant therapy as well as the data supporting the use of various graftless protocols as alternatives to grafting and conventional dental implant therapy.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Dental Implants , Humans , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Maxilla/surgery , Maxilla/pathology , Alveolar Process , Atrophy/pathology , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL