Use of seat belts among public transport drivers in Tacna, Peru: Prevalence and risk factors.

INTRODUCTION: There are individuals who still refuse to wear seat belts, despite its effectiveness in reducing morbidity and mortality in road traffic accidents. We aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors according to the use of seat belts among public transport drivers in Tacna, Peru. METHODOLOGY: This analytical transversal study was carried out among public transport drivers (buses and taxis) in a Peruvian city. Questionnaires were used to evaluate the general and occupational characteristics and the use of seat belts (observed). Descriptive statistics and risk factors were obtained, these latter through generalized linear models. RESULTS: Of the 460 drivers, 77% used their seat belts, with a difference in use depending on the type of public transport (p<0.001). In the multivariate model, the risk of not using the belt was associated with the following: older age (p<0.001), having complete studies (p<0.001), a higher level/category of driving license (3 categories had p<0.001), having a higher number of previous road traffic accidents (p = 0.011), and received medical attention in that accident (p<0.001), those who reported using a cell phone while driving (p = 0.005), if the co-driver's belt had 3 anchorage points (p<0.001), and working for > 5 hours that day (p = 0.002). However, male drivers and those who had their belt with 3 anchorage points had greater use (both p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One in five drivers did not use a seat belt, and important characteristics of those who did not comply with this traffic law were evaluated to generate control and intervention measures.

Percepción de miedo o exageración que transmiten los medios de comunicación en la población peruana durante la pandemia de la COVID-19 / Perception of exaggeration or fear propagated by the media among the Peruvian population during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introducción: En crisis sanitarias mundiales los medios de comunicación son importantes para informar sobre los temas relevantes a la población. Objetivo: Caracterizar y encontrar asociaciones de la percepción de miedo o exageración que transmiten los medios de comunicación en la pandemia del COVID-19 en ciudades del Perú. Métodos: Estudio transversal analítico y multicéntrico. Se realizó una encuesta virtual a 4009 personas, en 17 ciudades del Perú, del 15-20 de marzo del 2020. El instrumento, previamente validado, evaluó tres factores: la exageración de los medios; el miedo generado y la comunicación que provenía del personal de salud, familiares y amigos. Los coeficientes de relación y los valores p fueron calculados a través del uso de modelos lineales generalizados, con familia Gaussian y función de enlace identity. Se consideraron a los valores de p <0,05 como estadísticamente significativos. Resultados: Los participantes percibieron que las redes sociales (64 por ciento) y la televisión (57 por ciento) exageraban la información; también, los participantes manifestaron que la televisión (43 por ciento) y las redes sociales (41 por ciento) aumentaron la percepción del miedo. En cuanto a su familia/amigos, percibían que exageraban la situación (39 por ciento) y generaban miedo (25 por ciento). Al análisis multivariado, las mujeres (p<0,001), las que tuvieron secundaria completa (p=0,023), las universitarias (p=0,037) y con postgrado (p=0,002) tuvieron un menor puntaje total de miedo y percepción de exageración. Conclusiones: La percepción de exageración y generación de miedo en la población fueron en mayor medida ocasionados por la televisión y las redes sociales(AU)

Introduction: In global health crises the media is important for reporting on important issues to the population. Objective: To characterize and find associations of perceived fear or exaggeration conveyed by the media in the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Analytical and multicenter cross-sectional study. A virtual survey was conducted among 4009 people, in 17 cities of Peru, from March 15-20, 2020. The instrument, previously validated, evaluated three factors: the exaggeration of the media; the fear generated and the communication coming from health personnel, family members and friends. Relationship coefficients and p-values were calculated through the use of generalized linear models, with Gaussian family and identity linkage function. Values of p <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Social networks (64 percent) and television (57 percent) were perceived by all participants as exaggerating information; also, television (43 percent) and social networks (41 percent) increased the perception of fear. As for their family/friends, they perceived that they exaggerated the situation (39 percent) and generated fear (25 percent). In the multivariate analysis, women (p<0.001), those who had completed high school (p=0.023), were university students (p=0.037) and those with a postgraduate degree (p=0.002) had a lower total score of fear and perception of exaggeration. Conclusions: The perception of exaggeration and fear generation in the population were mostly caused by television and social networks(AU)