Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue ; 21(5): 541-5, 2012 Oct.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23135185

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To observe the alteration of the interproximal papilla height after single implant restoration in the anterior maxilla and to assess the influence of gingival biotypes on papilla regeneration. METHODS: Thirty patients with single-tooth implant-supported restorations in the anterior maxilla were assigned to two groups according to labial mucosa thickness. Group A: labial mucosal thickness≥1.5 mm and group B: labial mucosal thickness<1.5 mm. The presence of interproximal papilla as well as the distance between papilla apex and contact point were assessed at crown attachment (baseline) and after 6 months (follow-up).Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS19.0 software package. RESULTS: The 6-month survival rate of implants was 100%. The mean height of interproximal papilla at baseline and follow-up was (1.64±0.97) mm and (3.10±1.39) mm, respectively. A significant improvement in papilla height was found between baseline and follow-up(P<0.05). In group A, the mean distance from papilla apex to the contact point at mesial and distal aspects was (0.15±0.24) mm and (0.23±0.33) mm, respectively, and the presence of interproximal papilla were (97±5)% and (94±8)%, respectively. In group B, the mean distance from papilla apex to the contact point at mesial and distal aspects was (1.94±0.40) mm and (2.10±0.34) mm, respectively, and the presence of interproximal papilla was (53±9)% and (43±14)% respectively. Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The interproximal papilla height around single implant restorations could improve significantly after 6-month follow-up. The interproximal papilla height around single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla was influenced by gingival biotype. The regenerative potential of thick-gingival biotype was better than that of thin-gingival biotype.


Subject(s)
Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Maxilla , Crowns , Dental Implants, Single-Tooth , Gingiva , Humans , Mouth Mucosa
2.
Int J Oral Sci ; 4(2): 94-100, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22627613

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the papilla alterations around single-implant restorations in the anterior maxillae after crown attachment and to study the influence of soft tissue thickness on the papilla fill alteration. According to the inclusion criteria, 32 patients subjected to implant-supported single-tooth restorations in anterior maxillae were included. The patients were assigned to two groups according to the mucosal thickness: (i) group 1, 1.5 mm s mucosal thickness 3 mm; and (ii) group 2, 3 mm

Subject(s)
Crowns , Dental Implants, Single-Tooth , Dental Prosthesis Design , Esthetics, Dental , Gingiva/anatomy & histology , Adult , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Maxilla , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Tooth Cervix/anatomy & histology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...