Liberal versus restricted fluid resuscitation strategies in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies*.

OBJECTIVE: Hemorrhage is responsible for most deaths that occur during the first few hours after trauma. Animal models of trauma have shown that restricting fluid administration can reduce the risk of death; however, studies in patients are difficult to conduct due to logistical and ethical problems. To maximize the value of the existing evidence, we performed a meta-analysis to compare liberal versus restricted fluid resuscitation strategies in trauma patients. DATA SOURCES: Medline and Embase were systemically searched from inception to February 2013. STUDY SELECTION: We selected randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared different fluid administration strategies in trauma patients. There were no restrictions for language, population, or publication year. DATA EXTRACTION: Four randomized controlled trials and seven observational studies were identified from 1,106 references. One of the randomized controlled trials suffered from a high protocol violation rate and was excluded from the final analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: The quantitative synthesis indicated that liberal fluid resuscitation strategies might be associated with higher mortality than restricted fluid strategies, both in randomized controlled trials (risk ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.55; three trials; I(2), 0) and observational studies (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.28; seven studies; I(2), 21.4%). When only adjusted odds ratios were pooled for observational studies, odds for mortality with liberal fluid resuscitation strategies increased (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.38; six studies; I(2), 26.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence indicates that initial liberal fluid resuscitation strategies may be associated with higher mortality in injured patients. However, available studies are subject to a high risk of selection bias and clinical heterogeneity. This result should be interpreted with great caution.

Long-term outcome of patients with acute cholecystitis receiving antibiotic treatment: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have followed patients who received antibiotic treatment for acute cholecystitis (AC). The present retrospective study investigated recurrence rates of AC and analyzed factors associated with recurrence after antibiotic treatment in adult AC patients. METHODS: We analyzed patients treated with antibiotics for AC between October 1, 2004, and November 30, 2010. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with early recurrence. Generalized additive models were applied to detect the nonlinear effects of continuous covariates. RESULTS: The study included 226 patients (mean age: 62.2 years; 144 men [63.7 %]). The average duration of parenteral antibiotics was 8.0 days. Second-generation cephalosporins were administered to 199 patients (88.1 %). The Kaplan-Meier plot indicated that recurrences were more frequent within 100 days of AC; these were defined as early recurrences. The recurrence rate was 13.7 % (31/226) at a median follow-up of 308.5 days (early recurrences: 19/226 [8.4 %]). The duration of parenteral antibiotic use significantly correlated with early recurrence (hazard ratio: 0.83; 95 % confidence interval, 0.73-0.95; p = 0.005). Generalized additive models revealed that patients using parenteral antibiotics longer than 8 days were less likely to suffer from early recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of recurrence of AC in patients who received antibiotics alone was low. The recurrence rate was higher within 100 days of AC. Because of the inherent limitations of a retrospective study, further research is needed to identify factors associated with early recurrence.

Real-time tracheal ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of tracheal ultrasonography for assessing endotracheal tube position during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of patients undergoing emergency intubation during CPR. Real-time tracheal ultrasonography was performed during the intubation with the transducer placed transversely just above the suprasternal notch, to assess for endotracheal tube positioning and exclude esophageal intubation. The position of trachea was identified by a hyperechoic air-mucosa (A-M) interface with posterior reverberation artifact (comet-tail artifact). The endotracheal tube position was defined as endotracheal if single A-M interface with comet-tail artifact was observed. Endotracheal tube position was defined as intraesophageal if a second A-M interface appeared, suggesting a false second airway (double tract sign). The gold standard of correct endotracheal intubation was the combination of clinical auscultation and quantitative waveform capnography. The main outcome was the accuracy of tracheal ultrasonography in assessing endotracheal tube position during CPR. RESULTS: Among the 89 patients enrolled, 7 (7.8%) had esophageal intubations. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of tracheal ultrasonography were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94.4-100%), 85.7% (95% CI: 42.0-99.2%), 98.8% (95% CI: 92.5-99.0%) and 100% (95% CI: 54.7-100%), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 7.0 (95% CI: 1.1-43.0) and 0.0, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time tracheal ultrasonography is an accurate method for identifying endotracheal tube position during CPR without the need for interruption of chest compression. Tracheal ultrasonography in resuscitation management may serve as a powerful adjunct in trained hands.

Multiplex PCR system for rapid detection of pathogens in patients with presumed sepsis - a systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Blood culture is viewed as the golden standard for the diagnosis of sepsis but suffers from low sensitivity and long turnaround time. LightCycler SeptiFast (LC-SF) is a real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction test able to detect 25 common pathogens responsible for bloodstream infections within hours. We aim to assess the accuracy of LC-SF by systematically reviewing the published studies. METHOD: Related literature on Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was searched up to October 2012 for studies utilizing LC-SF to diagnose suspected sepsis and that provided sufficient data to construct two-by-two tables. RESULTS: A total of 34 studies enrolling 6012 patients of suspected sepsis were included. The overall sensitivity and specificity for LC-SF to detect bacteremia or fungemia was 0·75 (95% CI: 0·65-0·83) and 0·92 (95%CI:0·90-0·95), respectively. LC-SF had a high positive likelihood ratio (10·10) and a moderate negative likelihood ratio (0·27). Specifically, LC-SF had a sensitivity of 0·80 (95%CI: 0·70-0·88) and a specificity of 0·95(95%CI: 0·93-0·97) for the bacteremia outcome, and a sensitivity of 0·61 (95%CI: 0·48-0·72) and a specificity of 0·99 (95%CI: 0·99-0·99) for the fungemia outcome. High heterogeneity was found in the bacteremia outcome subgroup but not in the fungemia outcome subgroup. CONCLUSION: LC-SF is of high rule-in value for early detection of septic patients. In a population with low pretest probability, LC-SF test can still provide valuable information for ruling out bacteremia or fungemia.

The impact of adding clinical assistants on patient waiting time in a crowded emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) crowding causes prolonged waiting times. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential benefit of introducing clinical assistants to a busy and crowded ED. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study at an urban, academic tertiary medical centre. We introduced one clinical assistant to each ED shift. The main task of clinical assistants was managing the flow of incoming ED patients. The case group consisted of all adult non-trauma emergency patients during the case period from 1 September to 30 November 2008. The first control group consisted of all adult non-trauma emergency patients between 1 June and 31 August 2008 and the second control group consisted of all patients treated between 1 September and 30 November 2007. The primary outcome was the 'waiting time', defined as the time from triage to the time of the first medical order entered into the computer system. The secondary outcome was the number of adult non-trauma emergency patients who left the ED without being seen. RESULTS: There were 12 257 cases and 25 950 controls. The mean and median waiting times were significantly shorter in the case group. The mean waiting time of the case group was 20.86 min, which was 4.51 min (17.8%) shorter than that of the first control group and 7.41 min (26.2%) shorter than that of the second control group. The median waiting time of the case group was also significantly shorter than those of the control groups. The number of the patients who left without being seen was significantly smaller in the case period. CONCLUSIONS: In a busy and crowded ED, the introduction of clinical assistants to an existing emergency health service effectively reduces patient waiting times and decreases the number of patients leaving without being seen.

Occult Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in adult emergency department patients: rare but important.

BACKGROUND: We sought to elaborate the epidemiology and outcomes of adult patients with occult Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia who were inadvertently discharged from the emergency department (ED) before positive blood culture results were obtained. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2010, 759 true occult bacteremia cases were identified, including 65 patients with S. aureus bacteremia. Sixty-two patients were enrolled (case group) and analyzed using two 1:2 case-control strategies. Control group I patients were selected from among 997 S. aureus bacteremia patients directly admitted from the ED. Control group II patients were selected from 694 ED patients with occult bacteremia other than S. aureus. Cox regression analyses were used to assess the independent effect of occult S. aureus bacteremia on patient mortality. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the case group and control group I with respect to organ failure, septic shock, intensive care unit (ICU) admission proportion, length of ICU stay, and 30-day mortality. However, compared with control group II, the case group had significantly higher rates of hospital admission, organ failure, septic shock, ICU admission, and 30-day mortality. Age, endocarditis, and S. aureus infection were independent predictors of mortality among adult occult bacteremia patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with occult bacteremia, S. aureus infections had significantly greater adverse impacts on a variety of outcome variables than other bacterial infections. Because S. aureus bacteremia is frequently associated with endovascular or deep-seated infection, it is imperative that first-line clinicians perform prudent evaluations of cases with nonapparent infection foci before discharging febrile patients from EDs.

A randomized trial of compression first or analyze first strategies in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: results from an Asian community.

BACKGROUND: It is still under debate whether a period of cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be performed prior to rhythm analysis for defibrillation for out of hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). This study compared outcomes of OHCA treated by "compression first" (CF) versus "analyze first" (AF) strategies in an Asian community with low rates of shockable rhythms. METHODS: This randomized trial was conducted in Taipei City between February 2008 and December 2009. Dispatches of suspected OHCA that activated advanced life support teams were randomized into the CF and AF strategies. Patients assigned to CF strategy received 10 cycles of CPR prior to analysis by automatic external defibrillator. The primary outcome was sustained (>2 h) return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and secondary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: We included 289 cases in the final analysis after exclusion by pre-specified criteria, 141 were allocated to CF strategy and 148 to AF strategy. Baseline characteristics were similar. Thirty-seven (26.2%) of those receiving CF strategy and 49 (33.1%) of the AF strategy achieved sustained ROSC (p=0.25). In a post-hoc analysis of patients who achieved ROSC, those that received CF strategy were more likely to be discharged alive from the hospital (16/37=43.2% vs. 11/49=22.4%, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: In this study population of low rates of shockable rhythms, there was no difference in ROSC for CF or AF strategies. Considering the EMS operation situations, a period of paramedic-administered CPR for up to 10 cycles prior to rhythm analysis could be a feasible strategy in this community.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in maternal arrhythmic cardiogenic shock.

Very few cases of the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in pregnant women have been reported to date. We report the first case of the use of ECMO for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia with cardiogenic shock in a pregnant woman. A 28-year-old pregnant woman at 26 weeks of gestation presented with supraventricular tachycardia complicated with cardiogenic shock and fetal distress that was refractory to medication and electrical cardioversion. ECMO was applied, and it facilitated successful radiofrequency ablation.

Ultrasonographic lung sliding sign in confirming proper endotracheal intubation during emergency intubation.

AIM OF STUDY: Unrecognized one-lung intubations (also known as main-stem intubation) can lead to hypoventilation, atelectasis, barotrauma, and even patient death. Many traditional methods can be employed to detect one-lung intubation; however, each of these methods has limitations and is not consistently reliable in emergency settings. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and timeliness of ultrasound to confirm proper endotracheal intubation. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, observational study conducted at the emergency department of a national university teaching hospital. Patients received emergency tracheal intubation because of respiratory failure or cardiac arrest. After intubation, bedside ultrasound was performed with a transducer placed on the chest bilaterally at the mid-axillary line, to identify lung sliding over the lungs bilaterally during ventilation. Chest radiography was used as the criterion standard for confirmation of endotracheal tube position. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen patients needing tracheal intubation were included, and nine (7.8%) had one-lung intubations. The overall accuracy of ultrasound to confirm proper endotracheal intubation was 88.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81.6-93.3%). The positive predictive value was 94.7% (95% CI: 87.1-97.9%) in the non-cardiac-arrest group and 100% (95% CI: 87.1-100.0%) in the cardiac-arrest group. The median operating time of ultrasound was 88 s (interquartile range [IQR]: 55.0, 193.0), and of chest radiography was 1349 s (IQR: 879.0, 2221.0) post intubation. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the positive predictive value of bilateral lung sliding in confirming proper endotracheal intubation was high, especially among patients with cardiac arrest. Considerable time advantage of ultrasound over chest radiography was demonstrated.

Tracheal rapid ultrasound exam (T.R.U.E.) for confirming endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and timeliness of using tracheal ultrasound to examine endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study, conducted at the emergency department of a national university teaching hospital. Patients received emergency intubation because of impending respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, or severe trauma. The tracheal rapid ultrasound exam (T.R.U.E.) was performed during emergency intubation with the transducer placed transversely at the trachea over the suprasternal notch. Quantitative waveform capnography was used as the criterion standard for confirmation of tracheal intubation. The main outcome was the concordance between the T.R.U.E. and the capnography. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included in the analysis, and 17 (15.2%) had esophageal intubations. The overall accuracy of the T.R.U.E. was 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93.7-99.5%). The kappa (κ) value was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.84-1.00), indicating a high degree of agreement between the T.R.U.E. and capnography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the T.R.U.E. were 98.9% (95% CI: 94.3-99.8%), 94.1% (95% CI: 73.0-99.0%), 98.9% (95% CI: 94.3-99.8%) and 94.1% (95% CI: 73.0-99.0%). The median operating time of the T.R.U.E. was 9.0s (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.0, 14.0). CONCLUSIONS: The application of the T.R.U.E. to examine endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation is feasible, and can be rapidly performed.

High-dose vs non-high-dose proton pump inhibitors after endoscopic treatment in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: High-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (80-mg bolus, followed by 8-mg/h continuous infusion for 72 hours) have been widely studied and used. However, to date no concrete evidence has shown that high-dose PPIs are more effective than non-high-dose PPIs. METHODS: We performed a literature search for randomized controlled trials that compared the use of high-dose PPIs vs non-high-dose PPIs in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer and determined their effects on rebleeding, surgical intervention, and mortality. Outcomes data were combined in a meta-analysis and were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 1157 patients from 7 high-quality randomized studies were included in this meta-analysis. High-dose PPIs and non-high-dose PPIs did not differ in their effects on the rates of rebleeding (7 studies and 1157 patients; OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.88-1.91), surgical intervention (6 studies and 1052 patients; 1.49; 0.66-3.37), or mortality (6 studies and 1052 patients; 0.89; 0.37-2.13). Post hoc subgroup analyses revealed that summary outcomes measures were unaffected by severity of signs of recent hemorrhage at initial endoscopy, route of PPI administration, or PPI dose. CONCLUSION: Compared with non-high-dose PPIs, high-dose PPIs do not further reduce the rates of rebleeding, surgical intervention, or mortality after endoscopic treatment in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer.