The risk of delirium and falls or fractures with the use of overactive bladder anticholinergic medications.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if OAB anticholinergics have an increased risk of delirium or falls/fractures relative to OAB beta-3 agonist medications. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cohort study using linked administrative data from the universal healthcare system of Ontario, Canada. Participants were all residents >66 years of age who newly initiated an OAB medication between January 2016 and March 2020. Coprimary outcomes were evidence of a hospital visit with delirium, or for a fall/fracture. We used matching weights to make the three exposure groups (beta-3 agonist, oxybutynin, or newer OAB anticholinergics) comparable across 82 baseline characteristics. We examined both the risk during the first 30 days (logistic regression) and the risk during continuous usage (proportional hazards). RESULTS: We identified 103 024 older adults who started OAB medications. With matching weights, all measured variables were similar. The 30-day incidence of delirium was 0.31%, and fall/fracture was 1.07%; there was no significantly increased risk of either delirium (oxybutynin users OR 1.28 [95% CI 0.84-1.96], newer OAB anticholinergic users OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.58-1.46]) or falls/fractures (oxybutynin users OR 1.19 [95% CI 0.95-1.49], newer OAB anticholinergic users OR 1.14 [95% CI 0.91-1.43]) compared to beta-3 agonist users. With continuous usage, there was an increased HR of delirium among users of newer anticholinergics (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.26) and an increased HR for fall/fracture among oxybutynin users (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.24). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to beta-3 agonists, the continuous use of oxybutynin is associated with a significantly increased risk of fall/fracture, and newer OAB anticholinergics are associated with a significantly increased risk of delirium.

Hysterectomy in Ontario: A Population-Based Study of Outcomes and Complications in Minimally Invasive Compared with Abdominal Approaches.

OBJECTIVE: As quality-based procedures (QBPs) are being established across the province of Ontario, it is important to identify reliable quality indicators (QIs) to ensure that compensation coincides with quality. Hysterectomy is the most commonly performed gynaecologic procedure and as such is a care process for which a QBP is being developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technicity index (TI) as a QI for hysterectomy by defining it in the context of specific surgical outcomes and complications. METHODS: This population-based, retrospective cohort study included all women who underwent hysterectomy from April 2003 to October 2014 in the province of Ontario. Unadjusted and adjusted generalized linear models were created to assess the effect of a minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) approach on the primary outcome measure: all hysterectomy-associated complications (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2). RESULTS: Of the procedures meeting the study's inclusion criteria, 56.8% were performed using an abdominal hysterectomy approach, whereas 43.2% were performed using an MIH approach. Over the study period, TI improved significantly from 33.23% in 2003 to 58.47% in 2014. During this time span, the overall incidence of all hysterectomy-associated complications was 13.1%. CONCLUSION: The composite risk of all hysterectomy-associated complications was reduced by 46% with an MIH approach. The uptake of MIH improved significantly in Ontario from 2003 to 2014 and is adequately assessed by the TI. The TI is an appropriate QI for hysterectomy that can be used to track patients' outcomes and direct hysterectomy funding.

Association between method of pelvic organ prolapse repair involving the vaginal apex and re-operation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Vaginal apical suspension is essential for the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We aim to evaluate whether the method of apical repair is associated with different re-operation rates for POP recurrence or surgical complications. METHODS: Population-based, retrospective cohort study of all Ontario women receiving primary apical POP repairs from 2003 to 2015. Primary exposure was the method of apical POP repair. Primary outcome was re-operation for recurrent POP, and secondary outcomes were surgical procedures for genito-intestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) complications, fistula repair, and mesh revision or removal. RESULTS: Forty-three thousand four hundred fifty-eight women were included. Overall, the number of mesh-based apical repairs decreased over time, while the number of native-tissue repairs slightly increased (p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards (Cox PH) analysis demonstrated a significant increase in repeat POP operations for transvaginal mesh apical repairs (adjusted HR 1.28 [95% CI: 1.10-1.48]), but not in abdominal mesh repairs (adjusted HR 0.96 [95% CI: 0.81-1.13]) compared with vaginal native tissue apical repairs. Overall risk of repeat surgery for fistulas or GI and GU complications remained low (< 0.5%). Risk of mesh removal or revision was 11.5-11.9%, with no difference between abdominal versus vaginal mesh on multivariable analysis (adjusted HR 0.99 [95% CI: 0.78-1.26]). CONCLUSIONS: Re-operation for recurrent POP is highest in transvaginal mesh apical repairs; however, this risk did not differ between abdominal mesh and vaginal native tissue apical repairs. GI and GU re-operations are rare. There is no difference in mesh removal or revision rates between abdominal and vaginal mesh repairs.

Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS): Prevention, Recognition, and Repair.

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence relating to obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) with respect to diagnosis, repair techniques and outcomes. To formulate recommendations as to patient counselling regarding route of delivery for subsequent pregnancy after OASIS. OPTIONS: Obstetrical care providers caring for women with OASIS have the option of repairing the anal sphincter using end-to-end or overlapping techniques. They may also be involved in counselling women with prior OASIS regarding the route of delivery for future pregnancies. OUTCOMES: The outcome measured is anal continence following primary OASIS repair and after subsequent childbirth. EVIDENCE: Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library in May 2011 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., anal canal, obstetrics, obstetric labour complication, pregnancy complication, treatment outcome, surgery, quality of life) and key words (obstetrical anal sphincter injur*, anus sphincter, anus injury, delivery, obstetrical care, surgery, suturing method, overlap, end-to-end, feces incontinence). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational. There were no date or language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to September 2014. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES: The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Benefits from implementation of these guidelines include: improved diagnosis of OASIS, optimal functional outcomes following repair, and evidence-based counselling of women for future childbirth.

Objectif : Analyser les données probantes traitant des lésions obstétricales du sphincter anal (LOSA) en ce qui concerne leur diagnostic, les techniques visant leur réparation et les résultats de l'intervention. Formuler des recommandations permettant d'éclairer les conseils offerts aux patientes ayant connu des LOSA en ce qui a trait à la voie d'accouchement à privilégier dans le cadre des grossesses subséquentes. Options : Les fournisseurs de soins obstétricaux qui comptent des patientes ayant connu des LOSA disposent de l'option de réparer le sphincter anal en faisant appel à la méthode de suture « bout à bout ¼ (end-to-end) ou à la méthode « en paletot ¼ (overlapping). Ils pourraient également être appelés à conseiller des femmes ayant déjà connu des LOSA en ce qui a trait à la voie d'accouchement à privilégier pour les grossesses subséquentes. Issues : Le critère d'évaluation était la continence anale à la suite d'une réparation primaire de LOSA et à la suite d'un accouchement subséquent. Résultats : La littérature publiée a été récupérée par l'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans Medline, EMBASE et The Cochrane Library en mai 2011 au moyen d'un vocabulaire contrôlé (p. ex. anal canal, obstetrics, obstetric labour complication, pregnancy complication, treatment outcome, surgery, quality of life) et de mots clés (p. ex. obstetrical anal sphincter injur*, anus sphincter, anus injury, delivery, obstetrical care, surgery, suturing method, overlap, end-to-end, feces incontinence) appropriés. Les résultats ont été restreints aux analyses systématiques, aux études observationnelles et aux essais comparatifs randomisés / essais cliniques comparatifs. Aucune restriction n'a été imposée en matière de date ou de langue. Les recherches ont été mises à jour de façon régulière et intégrées à la directive clinique jusqu'en septembre 2014. La littérature grise (non publiée) a été identifiée par l'intermédiaire de recherches menées dans les sites Web d'organismes s'intéressant à l'évaluation des technologies dans le domaine de la santé et d'organismes connexes, dans des collections de directives cliniques, dans des registres d'essais cliniques et auprès de sociétés de spécialité médicale nationales et internationales. Valeurs : La qualité des résultats a été évaluée au moyen des critères décrits dans le rapport du Groupe d'étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs (Tableau). Avantages, désavantages et coûts : Parmi les avantages de la mise en œuvre de la présente directive clinique, on trouve : l'amélioration du diagnostic des LOSA, l'obtention d'issues fonctionnelles optimales à la suite de la réparation et l'offre de conseils reposant sur des données probantes aux femmes en ce qui concerne leurs futures grossesses. Déclarations sommaires 1. Les lésions obstétricales du sphincter anal mènent à des comorbidités considérables, dont l'incontinence anale, les fistules rectovaginales et la douleur. (II-2) 2. Les lésions obstétricales du sphincter anal sont plus souvent associées aux accouchements par forceps qu'aux accouchements par ventouse obstétricale. (II-2) 3. Réparation des lésions obstétricales du sphincter anal : a. L'utilisation de polyglactin 2-0 ou de polydioxanone 3-0 donne lieu, après six semaines, à des taux semblables de morbidité liée aux sutures. (I) b. La réparation du sphincter anal interne est recommandée puisque les femmes chez lesquelles la présence d'une anomalie affectant ce sphincter est révélée au cours de l'échographie postpartum sont plus susceptibles de connaître une incontinence anale. (III) c. La réparation du sphincter anal externe devrait englober la gaine fasciale. Le recours à la technique de suture « en paletot ¼ (chevauchement) nécessite souvent une mobilisation et une dissection de plus grande envergure des extrémités du sphincter; l'utilisation de cette technique n'est possible qu'en présence de déchirures sphinctériennes de degré 3b ou plus. (III) d. La présence persistante d'une anomalie du sphincter anal externe longtemps après l'accouchement pourrait accroître le risque de voir apparaître une aggravation des symptômes à la suite des accouchements vaginaux subséquents. (II-2) 4. Les lésions obstétricales du sphincter anal sont associées à une hausse du risque de rétention urinaire postpartum. (II-2) 5. À la suite de la réparation réussie d'une lésion obstétricale du sphincter anal, la plupart des femmes peuvent connaître un accouchement vaginal en toute sûreté dans le cadre d'une grossesse subséquente. (III) 6. Services de counseling offerts aux femmes au sujet de leurs accouchements subséquents : a. Le risque de récurrence d'une lésion obstétricale du sphincter anal dans le cadre d'un accouchement subséquent est de 4-8 %. (II-2) b. On a calculé que, pour prévenir un cas d'incontinence anale chez des femmes ayant déjà subi une lésion obstétricale du sphincter anal, la tenue de 2,3 césariennes planifiées s'avérerait nécessaire, le tout s'accompagnant alors d'une hausse des risques maternels. (II-2) Recommandations 1. Toutes les femmes devraient faire l'objet d'un examen rigoureux visant la détection de déchirures périnéales ou vaginales; celles qui présentent une déchirure dont la profondeur est plus que superficielle devraient, avant la mise en œuvre d'une réparation, faire l'objet d'un examen rectal systématique cherchant à établir la présence de lésions obstétricales du sphincter anal. (II-2B) 2. Le système de classification de l'Organisation mondiale de la santé devrait être utilisé pour classer les lésions obstétricales du sphincter anal. Ce système permet l'établissement d'une distinction entre le degré de déchirure du sphincter externe (3a < 50 % ou 3b ≥ 50 %) et la présence d'anomalies du sphincter interne (3c). La présence d'une lésion en boutonnière (button-hole injury) constitue un incident distinct et devrait être classée en conséquence. (III-B) 3. Chez les femmes qui connaissent un accouchement vaginal spontané, le taux de lésions obstétricales du sphincter anal est amoindri lorsque le fournisseur de soins obstétricaux ralentit la tête fœtale au moment du dégagement. (II-2A) 4. Épisiotomie : a. Dans le cadre d'un accouchement vaginal spontané ou instrumental, le fournisseur de soins obstétricaux devrait, pour assurer la prévention des lésions obstétricales du sphincter anal, respecter une politique prévoyant une utilisation « restreinte ¼ de l'épisiotomie (c.-à-d. seulement lorsque cela s'avère indiqué), plutôt qu'une utilisation « libre ¼ de cette intervention (c.-à-d. de façon systématique). (I-A) b. Lorsque la tenue d'une épisiotomie est jugée indiquée, l'octroi d'une préférence envers la tenue d'une incision médiolatérale (plutôt qu'envers la tenue d'une incision médiane) devrait être envisagé. (II-2B) L'angle d'incision optimal semble être d'au moins 45 degrés (idéalement, aux alentours de 60 degrés). (II-2B) 5. La réparation peut être différée (pendant 8-12h) sans effets nuisibles. La mise en œuvre d'un délai pourrait s'avérer nécessaire jusqu'à ce que les services d'un fournisseur de soins disposant de l'expérience nécessaire pour procéder à la réparation puissent être retenus. (I-A) 6. L'administration prophylactique d'une dose intraveineuse unique d'antibiotiques (céphalosporine de 2e génération, p. ex. céfotétan ou céfoxitine) devrait être mise en œuvre pour assurer la baisse des taux de complications de lésion périnéale à la suite de la réparation des lésions obstétricales du sphincter anal. (I-A) 7. Des laxatifs (p. ex. lactulose) devraient être prescrits à la suite de la réparation primaire d'une lésion obstétricale du sphincter anal puisqu'ils sont associés à des premières selles moins douloureuses et survenant plus rapidement, et à l'obtention plus rapide du congé de l'hôpital. L'utilisation d'agents constipants et d'agents de gonflement n'est pas recommandée. (I-A) 8. Les anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens et l'acétaminophène sont les analgésiques de première intention. Les opioïdes ne devraient être utilisés qu'avec précaution. La constipation devrait être évitée au moyen d'un laxatif ou d'un émollient fécal. (1-A) 9. À la suite de la constatation d'une lésion obstétricale du sphincter anal, les fournisseurs de soins devraient divulguer à leurs patientes le degré de la lésion subie et prendre les dispositions nécessaires à la mise en œuvre d'un suivi. Il est nécessaire de procéder à la documentation détaillée de la lésion et de sa réparation. (III-L) 10. Les femmes qui connaissent une incontinence anale après avoir subi une lésion obstétricale du sphincter anal devraient être orientées vers des services de physiothérapie du plancher pelvien. (I-A).

The effect of pelvic factures on future stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic fractures in women significantly disrupt the pelvic floor, which may cause stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Our objective was to assess the incidence of operative treatment for SUI and POP after pelvic fracture. METHODS: We used administrative data from Ontario, Canada, to conduct a retrospective cohort study. Female patients who underwent operative repair of a pelvic fracture between 2002 and 2010 were identified. The primary outcomes were the subsequent surgical treatment of SUI or POP. To compare the incidence with that of the general population, patients who had operative repair of a pelvic fracture were matched (1:2) to a person in the general population (with a propensity score to account for measurable potential confounders). Our primary analysis was a Cox proportional hazards model to compare hazard ratios (HR) in subjects with a pelvic facture and those without. RESULTS: We identified 390 female patients with a median age of 47 (IQR 30-67) years. Our median follow-up period was 5.9 (4.1-8.3) years. The absolute risk of SUI surgery after pelvic fracture was 3.3 % (13 out of 390) compared with 1.0 % (8 out of 769) in the matched general population sample. The HR for SUI surgery was 5.8 (95 % CI 2.2-15.1). The absolute risk of POP surgery after pelvic fracture was 1.8 % (7 out of 390) compared with 0.9 % (7 out of 769) in the matched general population. The HR for POP surgery was 2.3 (95 % CI 0.9-5.8). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who had a pelvic fracture requiring operative repair, there appears to be a significantly increased chance of surgery for SUI, but not for POP.

De novo stress urinary incontinence after vaginal repair for pelvic organ prolapse: one-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: A few studies have reported a wide range (2-43%) in incidence of de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in previously continent women. The aim of this study was to re-examine this incidence up to one year following vaginal repair of prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a cohort of women who underwent reconstructive vaginal repair of POP without a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure between 2003 and 2007 at two tertiary referral centers. Women were considered eligible if they were stress continent by symptoms and objective assessment (including urodynamics testing) prior to surgical repair. All women who had had any anti-incontinence procedure previously were excluded. The endpoint was subjective SUI that prompted the patient to undergo any treatment within one year from their prolapse surgery. RESULTS: 64 women, with a mean age of 61 (±11) years, were eligible for the study: 26 (41%) had preoperative symptoms of overactive bladder. Fifty-four patients were available for analysis at the one-year visit. Seven women (13.5%) had symptoms of SUI but only one (2%) was found to have SUI objectively. Another patient underwent anti-incontinence surgery following her prolapse surgery. CONCLUSION: The incidence of de novo SUI requiring treatment in previously continent women who underwent vaginal repairs for POP without concomitant anti-incontinence surgery is low (4%). A large-scale prospective study is necessary to further evaluate this finding.

The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the appearance and occurrence of abnormalities in the levator ani muscle seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in nulliparous women and in women after their first vaginal birth. METHODS: Multiplanar proton density magnetic resonance images were obtained at 0.5-cm intervals from 80 nulliparous and 160 vaginally primiparous women. These had been previously obtained in a study of stress incontinence, and half the primiparas had stress incontinence. All scans were reviewed independently by at least two examiners blinded to parity and continence status. RESULTS: No levator ani defects were identified in nulliparous women. Thirty-two primiparous women (20%) had a visible defect in the levator ani muscle. Defects were identified in the pubovisceral portion of the levator ani in 29 women and in the iliococcygeal portion in three women. Within the pubovisceral muscle, both unilateral and bilateral defects were found. The extent of abnormality varied from one individual to the next. Of the 32 women with defects, 23 (71%) were in the stress incontinent group. CONCLUSION: Abnormalities in the levator ani muscle are present on MRI after a vaginal delivery but are not found in nulliparas.