Use of a wearable device to compare subjective and objective fatigue in lung cancer patients and cancer-free controls.

PURPOSE: The study evaluates the use of heart rate variability (HRV), a measure of autonomic nervous system (ANS) modulation via wearable smart bands, to objectively assess cancer-related fatigue (CRF) levels. It aims to enhance understanding of fatigue by distinguishing between LF/HF ratios and LF/HF disorder ratios through HRV and photoplethysmography (PPG), identifying them as potential biomarkers. METHODS: Seventy-one lung cancer patients and 75 non-cancer controls wore smart bands for one week. Fatigue was assessed using Brief Fatigue Inventory, alongside sleep quality and daily interference. HRV parameters were analyzed to compare groups. RESULTS: Cancer patients showed higher fatigue and interference levels than controls (64.8% vs. 54.7%). Those with mild fatigue had elevated LF/HF disorder ratios during sleep (40% vs. 20%, P = 0.01), similar to those with moderate to severe fatigue (50% vs. 20%, P = 0.01), indicating more significant autonomic dysregulation. Notably, mild fatigue patients had higher mean LF/HF ratios than controls (1.9 ± 1.34 vs. 1.2 ± 0.6, P = 0.01), underscoring the potential of disorder ratios in signaling fatigue severity. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing wearable smart bands for HRV-based analysis is feasible for objectively assess CRF levels in cancer patients, especially during sleep. By distinguishing between LF/HF ratios and LF/HF disorder ratios, our findings suggest that wearable technology and detailed HRV analysis offer promising avenues for real-time fatigue monitoring. This approach has the potential to significantly improve cancer care by providing new methods for managing and intervening in CRF, particularly with a focus on autonomic dysregulation as a crucial factor.

Cancer-related fatigue classification based on heart rate variability signals from wearables.

Background: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most distressing side effect in cancer patients and affects the survival rate. However, most patients do not report their fatigue level. This study is aimed to develop an objective CRF assessment method based on heart rate variability (HRV). Methods: In this study, patients with lung cancer who received chemotherapy or target therapy were enrolled. Patients wore wearable devices with photoplethysmography that regularly recorded HRV parameters for seven consecutive days and completed the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) questionnaire. The collected parameters were divided into the active and sleep phase parameters to allow tracking of fatigue variation. Statistical analysis was used to identify correlations between fatigue scores and HRV parameters. Findings: In this study, 60 patients with lung cancer were enrolled. The HRV parameters including the low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF) ratio and the LF/HF disorder ratio in the active phase and the sleep phase were extracted. A linear classifier with HRV-based cutoff points achieved correct classification rates of 73 and 88% for mild and moderate fatigue levels, respectively. Conclusion: Fatigue was effectively identified, and the data were effectively classified using a 24-h HRV device. This objective fatigue monitoring method may enable clinicians to effectively handle fatigue problems.

Measurement of Cancer-Related Fatigue Based on Heart Rate Variability: Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related fatigue is a serious side effect of cancer, and its treatment can disrupt the quality of life of patients. Clinically, the standard method for assessing cancer-related fatigue relies on subjective experience retrieved from patient self-reports, such as the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). However, most patients do not self-report their fatigue levels. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aim to develop an objective cancer-related fatigue assessment method to track and monitor fatigue in patients with cancer. METHODS: In total, 12 patients with lung cancer who were undergoing chemotherapy or targeted therapy were enrolled. We developed frequency-domain parameters of heart rate variability (HRV) and BFI based on a wearable-based HRV measurement system. All patients completed the BFI-Taiwan version questionnaire and wore the device for 7 consecutive days to record HRV parameters such as low frequency (LF), high frequency (HF), and LF-HF ratio (LF-HF). Statistical analysis was used to map the correlation between subjective fatigue and objective data. RESULTS: A moderate positive correlation was observed between the average LF-HF ratio and BFI in the sleep phase (ρ=0.86). The mapped BFI score derived by the BFI mapping method could approximate the BFI from the patient self-report. The mean absolute error rate between the subjective and objective BFI scores was 3%. CONCLUSIONS: LF-HF is highly correlated with the cancer-related fatigue experienced by patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Beyond revealing fatigue levels objectively, continuous HRV recordings through the photoplethysmography watch device and the defined parameters (LF-HF) can define the active phase and sleep phase in patients with lung cancer who undergo chemotherapy or targeted chemotherapy, allowing a deduction of their sleep patterns.