Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 7(10): e47355, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23077599

ABSTRACT

Parvin is a putative F-actin binding protein important for integrin-mediated cell adhesion. Here we used overexpression of Drosophila Parvin to uncover its functions in different tissues in vivo. Parvin overexpression caused major defects reminiscent of metastatic cancer cells in developing epithelia, including apoptosis, alterations in cell shape, basal extrusion and invasion. These defects were closely correlated with abnormalities in the organization of F-actin at the basal epithelial surface and of integrin-matrix adhesion sites. In wing epithelium, overexpressed Parvin triggered increased Rho1 protein levels, predominantly at the basal side, whereas in the developing eye it caused a rough eye phenotype and severely disrupted F-actin filaments at the retina floor of pigment cells. We identified genes that suppressed these Parvin-induced dominant effects, depending on the cell type. Co-expression of both ILK and the apoptosis inhibitor DIAP1 blocked Parvin-induced lethality and apoptosis and partially ameliorated cell delamination in epithelia, but did not rescue the elevated Rho1 levels, the abnormal organization of F-actin in the wing and the assembly of integrin-matrix adhesion sites. The rough eye phenotype was suppressed by coexpression of either PTEN or Wech, or by knock-down of Xrp1. Two main conclusions can be drawn from our studies: (1), high levels of cytoplasmic Parvin are toxic in epithelial cells; (2) Parvin in a dose dependent manner affects the organization of actin cytoskeleton in both wing and eye epithelia, independently of its role as a structural component of the ILK-PINCH-Parvin complex that mediates the integrin-actin link. Thus, distinct genetic interactions of Parvin occur in different cell types and second site modifier screens are required to uncover such genetic circuits.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Microfilament Proteins/genetics , Signal Transduction/genetics , Actins/metabolism , Animals , Apoptosis/genetics , Cell Adhesion , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Epithelium/growth & development , Epithelium/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Microfilament Proteins/metabolism , Organ Specificity/genetics
2.
J Cell Sci ; 125(Pt 13): 3221-32, 2012 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22454516

ABSTRACT

Integrin-linked kinase (ILK), PINCH and parvin constitute the tripartite IPP complex that maintains the integrin-actin link at embryonic muscle attachment sites (MASs) in Drosophila. Here we showed that parvin null mutants in Drosophila exhibit defects in muscle adhesion, similar to ILK and PINCH mutants. Furthermore, the identical muscle phenotype of the triple mutant, which for the first time in any organism removed the entire IPP-complex function, genetically demonstrated that parvin, ILK and PINCH function synergistically. This is consistent with the tight localization of the tripartite complex at sites of integrin adhesion, namely MASs in the developing embryo and focal-contact-like structures in the wing epithelium. Parvin contains tandem unconventional calponin-homology (CH) domains separated by a linker sequence, and a less-well conserved N-terminal region. In vivo structure-function analysis revealed that all the domains are essential for parvin function, whereas recruitment at integrin adhesion sites is mediated by two localization signals: one located within the CH2 domain as previously reported, and a second novel signal within the CH1 domain. Interestingly, this site is masked by the linker region between the two CH domains, suggesting a regulatory mechanism to control parvin localization. Finally, whereas in muscles only ILK controls the stability and localization of both PINCH and parvin, in the wing epithelium the three proteins mutually depend on each other. Thus molecular differences exist in the assembly properties of IPP complex in specific tissues during development, where differential modulation of the integrin connection to the cytoskeleton is required.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/growth & development , Integrins/metabolism , Microfilament Proteins/metabolism , Muscles/metabolism , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified/genetics , Animals, Genetically Modified/growth & development , Animals, Genetically Modified/metabolism , Binding Sites , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Embryo, Nonmammalian/cytology , Embryo, Nonmammalian/embryology , Embryo, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Larva/genetics , Larva/growth & development , Larva/metabolism , Microfilament Proteins/genetics , Multiprotein Complexes/genetics , Multiprotein Complexes/metabolism , Muscles/cytology , Point Mutation , Protein Binding , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Protein Stability , Protein Structure, Tertiary , Structure-Activity Relationship , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Wings, Animal/cytology , Wings, Animal/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...