ABSTRACT
The goals of primary prevention in coronary atherosclerosis are to avoid sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction or the need for revascularization procedures. Successful prevention will rely on accurate identification, effective therapy and monitoring of those at risk. Identification and potential monitoring can be achieved using cardiac computed tomography (CT). Cardiac CT can determine coronary artery calcification (CAC), a useful surrogate of coronary atherosclerosis burden. Cardiac CT can also assess coronary CT angiography (CCTA). CCTA can identify arterial lumen narrowing and highlight mural atherosclerosis hitherto hidden from other anatomical approaches. Herein we consider the role of CCTA and CAC-scoring in subclinical atherosclerosis. We explore the use of these modalities in screening and discuss data that has used CCTA for guiding primary prevention. We examine therapeutic trials using CCTA to determine the effects of plaque-modifying therapies. Finally, we address the role of CCTA and CAC to guide therapy as defined in current primary prevention documents. CCTA has emerged as an essential tool in the detection and management of clinical coronary artery disease. To date, its role in subclinical atherosclerosis is less well defined, yet with modern CT scanners and continued pharmacotherapy development, CCTA is likely to achieve a more prominent place in the primary prevention of coronary atherosclerosis.
ABSTRACT
Coronary artery calcification (CAC) on body CT imaging is considered a coincidental finding in cancer patients. In order to determine the significance of CAC in cancer patients we evaluated the prognostic utility of CAC detected on oncology FDG-PET/CT studies. A retrospective study was performed of consecutive FDG-PET/CT studies from January to March 2011. CAC was identified on the CT portion of FDG/PET-CT studies. Chart review documented statin use, the Framingham risk score (FRS) (includes age, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and smoking), the primary malignancy and metastases. The primary end point was a composite of death and cardiovascular (CV) events (non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), PCI or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)). 266 patients had a median follow up of 41 months (95% CI 31-56 months). CAC was noted in 140 patients. Based on CAC, potentially 84 patients would have had a change in statin prescribing (p < 0.01). CAC was associated with the primary end point on univariable and multivariable analysis (OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.42-4.77) (p < 0.01). On univariable Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, CAC was associated with decreased survival only in the absence of metastases (p < 0.01). Cox proportional hazard modelling demonstrated CAC was associated with mortality and cardiac events in patients without metastases, whereas FRS was not (For CAC: HR 1.69 (95% CI 1.22-2.35), p = 0.002). CAC is commonly detected with oncology FDG-PET/CT. In cancer patients CAC was associated with an increased risk of clinical events. CAC reduced survival free time in patients without metastases. CAC might therefore be considered more than a coincidentaloma in patients without metastases.
