Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 18(7): 1884-90, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21225352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is general concern that high-risk patients are more susceptible to the adverse effect of pneumoperitoneum and they are often denied laparoscopic surgery. This study investigated the impact of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection for patients with high operative risk, which was defined as American Society of Anesthesiologist classes 3 and 4. METHODS: Three hundred thirty-five consecutive high-risk patients who had colorectal cancer resection by open or laparoscopic surgery were included. The patient and tumor characteristics and operative outcomes were recorded prospectively, and comparison was made between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared to open surgery, patients with laparoscopic resection had a shorter hospital stay (8 [6-12] vs. 6 [4-9] days; P < 0.001), less blood loss (200 [100-400] vs. 140 [80-250] mL; P = 0.006), reduced cardiac complication rate (13.2% vs. 3.7%; P = 0.006), overall operative complication rate (36.6% vs. 21.3%; P = 0.006), and a trend toward a lower mortality rate (4.4% vs. 0.9%; P = 0.083). There was no difference in 3-year overall and disease-free survival between two groups. Operative blood loss (P = 0.035; odds ratio = 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-6.78) and open surgery (P = 0.007; odds ratio = 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-4.23) were independent factors for occurrence of complication. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection is associated with more favorable short-term results and should be recommended as the preferred treatment option for high-risk patients.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy , Postoperative Complications , Aged , Colectomy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Comorbidity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
2.
Clin Transplant ; 24(3): 410-4, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19807745

ABSTRACT

We report a case of living donor liver transplantation using a small-for-size graft (SFSG) with graft to estimated standard liver volume of only 28% in a recipient with spontaneous splenorenal shunt and demonstrate the value of intraoperative ultrasonic flowmetry. Despite an SFSG, the graft was underperfused. This was recognized by flowmetry and was rectified by ligation of the splenorenal shunt.


Subject(s)
Liver Circulation/physiology , Liver Transplantation , Liver/blood supply , Renal Veins/surgery , Splenic Vein/surgery , Adult , Female , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Ligation , Living Donors , Male , Organ Size , Prognosis , Renal Veins/diagnostic imaging , Splenic Vein/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...