Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Oncol ; 28(9): 2264-2271, 2017 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28633425

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mutations in the androgen receptor (AR) ligand-binding domain (LBD), such as F877L and T878A, have been associated with resistance to next-generation AR-directed therapies. ARN-509-001 was a phase I/II study that evaluated apalutamide activity in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Here, we evaluated the type and frequency of 11 relevant AR-LBD mutations in apalutamide-treated CRPC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood samples from men with nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC) and metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) pre- or post-abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) treatment (≥6 months' exposure) were evaluated at baseline and disease progression in trial ARN-509-001. Mutations were detected in circulating tumor DNA using a digital polymerase chain reaction-based method known as BEAMing (beads, emulsification, amplification and magnetics) (Sysmex Inostics' GmbH). RESULTS: Of the 97 total patients, 51 had nmCRPC, 25 had AAP-naïve mCRPC, and 21 had post-AAP mCRPC. Ninety-three were assessable for the mutation analysis at baseline and 82 of the 93 at progression. The overall frequency of detected AR mutations at baseline was 7/93 (7.5%) and at progression was 6/82 (7.3%). Three of the 82 (3.7%) mCRPC patients (2 AAP-naïve and 1 post-AAP) acquired AR F877L during apalutamide treatment. At baseline, 3 of the 93 (3.2%) post-AAP patients had detectable AR T878A, which was lost after apalutamide treatment in 1 patient who continued apalutamide treatment for 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The overall frequency of detected mutations at baseline (7.5%) and progression (7.3%) using the sensitive BEAMing assay was low, suggesting that, based on this assay, AR-LBD mutations such as F877L and T878A are not common contributors to de novo or acquired resistance to apalutamide. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01171898.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Point Mutation , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Thiohydantoins/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Circulating Tumor DNA/genetics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 70(1): 65-74, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22623210

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This phase I study assessed the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor effects of sunitinib combined with modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6). METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies received mFOLFOX6 in 2-week cycles with escalating sunitinib doses (25, 37.5, and 50 mg/day) on three schedules: 2 weeks on, 2 weeks off (2/2); 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off (4/2); or continuous daily dosing (CDD). Patients received up to 8 treatment cycles (Schedule 2/2 and CDD schedule) or 6 cycles (Schedule 4/2). An expansion cohort enrolled patients with metastatic colorectal cancer at the Schedule 2/2 MTD. RESULTS: Overall, 53 patients were enrolled, with 43 evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). On Schedule 2/2 (n = 18), DLTs occurred in three patients at 50 mg/day (grade 4 neutropenia [n = 1]; grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia [n = 2]) and two patients achieved partial responses (PRs). On Schedule 4/2 (n = 13), 37.5 mg/day exceeded the MTD with two DLTs (febrile neutropenia and grade 4 hypokalemia, respectively). On the CDD schedule (n = 12), the MTD was 25 mg/day; one DLT (grade 3 stomatitis) was reported and two patients achieved PRs. The most common adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. No clinically significant drug-drug interactions were apparent between sunitinib, its metabolite SU12662, and mFOLFOX6. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib combined with mFOLFOX6 had acceptable tolerability. The MTDs were sunitinib 50 mg/day on Schedule 2/2 and 25 mg/day on the CDD schedule. A MTD for Schedule 4/2 was not established.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacokinetics , Area Under Curve , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Fatigue/chemically induced , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Fluorouracil/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Indoles/administration & dosage , Indoles/adverse effects , Indoles/pharmacokinetics , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Leucovorin/adverse effects , Leucovorin/pharmacokinetics , Male , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/pathology , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Organoplatinum Compounds , Oxaliplatin , Pyrroles/administration & dosage , Pyrroles/adverse effects , Pyrroles/pharmacokinetics , Sunitinib , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Treatment Outcome
3.
Ann Oncol ; 23(3): 688-694, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21821830

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This phase 1/2 study assessed sunitinib combined with docetaxel (Taxotere) and prednisone in chemotherapy-naive metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), 25 patients in four dose escalation cohorts received 3-week cycles of sunitinib (2 weeks on, 1 week off), docetaxel and prednisone, preceded by a 4-week sunitinib 50 mg/day lead in. RP2D was evaluated in 55 additional patients. The primary end point was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate. RESULTS: One phase 1 dose-limiting toxicity occurred (grade 3 hyponatremia). The RP2D was sunitinib 37.5 mg/day, docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and prednisone 5 mg b.i.d. During phase 2, confirmed PSA responses occurred in 31 patients [56.4% (95% confidence interval 42.3-69.7)]. Median time to PSA progression was 9.8 months. Forty-one patients (75%) were treated >3 months, 12 (22%) completed the study (16 cycles) and 43 (78%) discontinued (36% for disease progression and 27% adverse events). The most frequent treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (53%; 15% febrile) and fatigue/asthenia (16%). Among 33 assessable patients, 14 (42.4%) had confirmed partial response. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 12.6 and 21.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This combination was moderately well tolerated, with promising response rate and survival benefit, justifying further investigation in mCRPC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Docetaxel , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Humans , Indoles/administration & dosage , Indoles/adverse effects , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Prednisone/adverse effects , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pyrroles/administration & dosage , Pyrroles/adverse effects , Sunitinib , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Taxoids/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...