ABSTRACT
Repetitive tasks, awkward or prolonged working postures, and high cognitive load are risk factors for occupational musculoskeletal disorders. Ophthalmologists may be vulnerable given that they are exposed to a combination of these factors. This national study assesses the prevalence, severity and associations of back and neck pain amongst UK consultant ophthalmologists. A postal survey was conducted using addresses supplied by the Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson correlation coefficient, two-tailed probability testing, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunn's multiple comparison test. 518 responses were received (50.3 % response rate). Back and neck pain were reported by 50.6 % (262/518) and 31.8 % (165/518) of respondents, respectively, with 62.4 % (323/518) reporting one or both. 33.6 % (174/518) reported pain whilst operating, of whom 78.7 % (137/174) found operating exacerbated their pain. 31.7 % (164/518) reported pain when using the slit lamp, of whom 71.3 % (117/164) found it exacerbated their pain. Individual subspecialties showed a significant relative risk of back or neck pain in some circumstances, when compared to ophthalmologists as a whole. Occupational back and neck pain remains a problem amongst ophthalmologists. Recommendations are made for modifications to the working environment, and consideration should be given to improving education for trainees.
Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Neck Pain/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Consultants , Female , Humans , Low Back Pain/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Neck Pain/etiology , Posture , Prevalence , Risk Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiologySubject(s)
Eye Injuries/surgery , Lacerations/surgery , Lacrimal Apparatus/injuries , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Intubation/instrumentation , Male , Middle Aged , Stents , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess and compare the change in quality-of-life and function following treatment with botulinum toxin (BTX) using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) and Blepharospasm Disability Index (BSDI) scores. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 62 consecutive patients treated with BTX for blepharospasm conducted during a postinterventional telephone interview. Post hoc analysis converts the GBI to a score from -100 (maximum harm) through 0 (no effect) to +100 (maximum benefit). The BSDI is converted to a score on a scale from -4 (maximum harm) through 0 (no effect) to +4 (maximum benefit). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test and linear regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: A statistically significant benefit (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) from treatment of 31.36 (95% confidence interval = 26.22-36.50; p < 0.001) and 1.04 (95% confidence interval = 0.80-1.27; p < 0.001) using the GBI and BSDI scores, respectively. Regression analysis was performed demonstrating a strong positive correlation between both scales (r = 0.637). CONCLUSIONS: BTX treatment for blepharospasm is associated with significant patient-reported improvements in quality-of-life (GBI) and functional ability (BSDI) with a strong positive correlation between both scores.