Improved time to treatment failure with an intermittent oxaliplatin strategy: results of CONcePT.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin is an integral component of colorectal cancer treatment, but its use is limited by neurotoxicity. The Combined Oxaliplatin Neurotoxicity Prevention Trial (CONcePT) tested intermittent oxaliplatin (IO) administration and the use of concurrent calcium and magnesium salts (Ca/Mg), two modifications intended to reduce neurotoxicity and extend the duration of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this trial involving double randomization, 140 patients were randomized to receive modified FOLFOX7 plus bevacizumab with IO (eight-cycle blocks of oxaliplatin treatment) versus continuous oxaliplatin (CO); and Ca/Mg versus placebo (pre- and postoxaliplatin infusion). The primary end point was time-to-treatment failure (TTF). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients were entered and treated up to the point of early study termination due to concerns by the data-monitoring committee (DMC) that Ca/Mg adversely affected tumor response. Tumor response was not a study end point. Given DMC concerns, an additional independent, blinded radiology review of all images showed no adverse effect of treatment schedule or Ca/Mg on response by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. The IO schedule was superior to CO [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.581, P = 0.0026] for both TTF and time-to-tumor progression (TTP) (HR = 0.533, P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: An IO dosing schedule had a significant benefit on both TTF and TTP versus CO dosing in this trial despite the very attenuated sample. There was no effect of Ca/Mg on response.

Therapy for patients with high grade astrocytoma using intraarterial chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: High grade astrocytomas account for approximately 40% of all primary brain tumors. The median survival is approximately 8-10 months for patients with glioblastoma multiforme and 36 months for patients with anaplastic astrocytoma. The results of systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of brain tumors have been reported to be less than satisfactory, mainly because of the blood-brain barrier impermeability for chemotherapeutic drugs. Intraarterial chemotherapy has been an attractive alternative with which to overcome this problem. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with high grade astrocytoma (glioblastoma multiforme [63 patients] and anaplastic astrocytoma--[20 patients]) were treated with intraarterial (intracarotid and/or intravertebral) chemotherapy and radiation therapy between 1987 and 1997. Patients received cisplatin, 60 mg/m2, and etoposide, 40 mg/m2. Radiation therapy was delivered either after completion of the chemotherapy or concomitantly with the chemotherapy. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 71 evaluable patients with high grade astrocytoma (48%) responded to the chemotherapy. The median survival for patients with glioblastoma multiforme who received chemotherapy prior to radiation therapy was 20 months versus 7 months for those patients who underwent concomitant chemotherapy/radiation therapy. Patients with anaplastic astrocytoma who received chemotherapy prior to radiation therapy had a median survival of 45 months compared with 12 months for patients who received concomitant chemotherapy/ radiation therapy. The toxicity profile has been reported to be mild and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Intraarterial chemotherapy for patients with glioblastoma multiforme, delivered prior to radiation therapy, appears to result in a median survival three times longer than that achieved with concomitant chemotherapy/radiation therapy. In addition, patients appear to survive substantially longer than they do after radiation therapy with the addition of systemic chemotherapy. Side effects are reported to be acceptable.

Toxicities related to intraarterial infusion of cisplatin and etoposide in patients with brain tumors.

Chemotherapy for malignant brain tumors has a limited efficacy largely due to restricted blood-brain barrier permeability for chemotherapeutic drugs. Intraarterial chemotherapy (IAC) has the advantage of increased uptake during the first passage of the drugs through tumor capillaries. Initial IAC trials had less than satisfactory results due to unacceptable toxicities. Between 1987 and 1996, 173 patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors were treated with intraarterial (intracarotid and/or intravertebral) cisplatin and etoposide (VP-16). Out of these, 168 patients, who received a total of 438 cycles, were evaluated for the incidence of toxicities. Patients received either cisplatin at 40 mg/m2 and VP-16 at 20 mg/m2 or cisplatin at 60 mg/m2 and VP-16 at 40 mg/m2. Nausea and vomiting were the most common toxicities (42 patients, 14% of cycles). Arterial puncture was associated with a 1.6% incidence of groin hematomas (6 patients), and a 0.7% incidence of failure to canulate the carotid or vertebral arteries (3 patients). Neurologic toxicities included headache (1.4% of cycles, 5 patients), focal seizures (1.4% of cycles, 5 patients), transient confusion and urinary retention/incontinence (1.9% of cycles, 8 patients), and blurred vision (0.9% of cycles, 4 patients). We have not seen visual loss, strokes, major vessel dissection or thrombosis, or myelosuppression. Toxicity incidence was higher in patients with metastatic brain tumors than in those with primary brain tumors (34% versus 17%, p < 0.001). It was also higher in patients who had brain radiation therapy (RT) prior to IAC than in those who had RT concomitant with IAC (31% versus 19%, p = 0.05). No significant difference in toxicity incidence was noticed between patients who received RT concomitant with IAC and those who received RT after IAC (19% and 23% respectively, p = 0.08). Intracarotid chemotherapy given prior to RT resulted in 23 months of median survival for patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Intraarterial chemotherapy with cisplatin and VP-16 is a relatively safe treatment modality, especially in patients with primary brain tumors who have not received brain radiotherapy.

Preclinical and clinical evaluation of 5-fluorouracil biochemical modulation with folinic acid and hydroxyurea for patients with colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 140,000 new cases of colorectal carcinoma will be diagnosed in 1995 in the United States, and more than one-third of these patients will die from progressive disease. Despite the modest improvement in response rate with chemotherapy, little improvement in patient survival has been noted. Consequently, the evaluation of new agents, modalities, and combinations is needed. METHODS: Two cell lines, HCT 116 and COLO 320 HSR, were treated with various concentrations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid (FA), and hydroxyurea (HU). Subsequently, 41 patients with advanced, measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma were enrolled in the study. Patients were treated with oral doses of HU (500 mg) every 8 hours on Days 1 and 2, 5-FU (400-500 mg/m2) intravenously Day 2 and FA (100 mg/m2) intravenously on Day 2 of every week for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 40 were evaluable for response. RESULTS: In both cell lines, the combination of 5-FU/FA/HU consistently produced the best cytotoxic effect. Clinically, the maximum tolerated dose of 5-FU was established at a level of 500 mg/m2 (450 mg/m2 for patients older than 70 years of age). Ten patients experienced Grade 3 or 4 toxicity, consisting mainly of diarrhea. Eleven of 40 evaluable patients responded (three complete responses, eight partial responses), with a median survival of 12+ months and time to progression of 8.5+ months. CONCLUSION: The biochemical modulation of 5-FU with FA and HU were significantly effective in treating patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Overall, this regimen was well tolerated with only moderate toxicity. Further studies incorporating intravenous HU as well as a randomized Phase III study of 5-FU/FA/HU versus 5-FU/FA are recommended.

Intracarotid chemotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin for malignant brain tumors.

Chemotherapy for tumors of the central nervous system has a limited efficacy presumably because of restricted blood-brain barrier permeability. The advantage of regional intra-arterial administration of anticancer drugs is an increased uptake during the first passage of the drugs through tumor capillaries. Twenty patients with high-grade astrocytomas (HGA) and 28 patients with metastatic brain tumors (MBT) received intracarotid/intravertebral infusion of etoposide and cisplatin. Eight patients with HGA who underwent incomplete resection responded to chemotherapy alone. Four additional patients had complete resection of the tumor. Median survival time of the group (responders and nonresponders) has been 14 months. Twelve patients with MBT responded to chemotherapy alone (six had complete response [CR], and six had partial response [PR]) with a median survival time of 7 months. Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) appears to be effective with acceptable toxicities. Accrual of additional patients is required before a final conclusion can be reached.

Management of metastases-induced acute pancreatitis in small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Metastases-induced acute pancreatitis is an uncommon condition that has a poor prognosis. Risk factors of acute pancreatitis in known cases have been studied and there is a low survival rate with more than three risk factors on presentation regardless of treatment rendered. These patients should be treated conservatively. Chemotherapy may be attempted in patients with three or fewer poor prognostic signs.

Injurious effects of radiation on the esophagus.

Esophageal damage secondary to radiation therapy to thoracic tumors is a major dose limiting complication. Concomitant use of chemotherapeutic agents enhance this problem which can appear as esophagitis early in the course of treatment or as strictures later. Early complications usually are treated conservatively, whereas endoscopic dilatations of the esophagus are often used for strictures. Newer developments in the field include use of arachidonic acid metabolism pathway inhibitors and radioprotectants. The use of these pharmacologicals, together with modification of the mechanics of radiation delivery, may lead us close to elimination of the complications in normal esophageal tissue, while enhancing localized response in the thoracic tumors.