Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 59
Filter
1.
J Appl Lab Med ; 9(3): 430-439, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38576222

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Plasma copeptin measurement is useful for the differential diagnoses of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. It has also been proposed as a prognostic marker for cardiovascular diseases. However, limited information is available about the within- (CVI) and between-subject (CVG) biological variation (BV). This study presents BV estimates for copeptin in healthy individuals. METHODS: Samples were collected weekly from 41 healthy subjects over 5 weeks and analyzed using the BRAHMS Copeptin proAVP KRYPTOR assay after at least 8 h of food and fluid abstinence. Outlier detection, variance homogeneity, and trend analysis were performed followed by CV-ANOVA for BV and analytical variation (CVA) estimation with 95% confidence intervals. Reference change values (RCVs), index of individuality (II), and analytical performance specification (APS) were also calculated. RESULTS: The analysis included 178 results from 20 males and 202 values from 21 females. Copeptin concentrations were significantly higher in males than in females (mean 8.5 vs 5.2 pmol/L, P < 0.0001). CVI estimates were 18.0% (95% CI, 15.4%-21.6%) and 19.0% (95% CI, 16.4%-22.6%), for males and females, respectively; RCVs were -35% (decreasing value) and 54% (increasing value). There was marked individuality for copeptin. No result exceeded the diagnostic threshold (>21.4 pmol/L) for arginine vasopressin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of BV data allows for refined APS and associated II, and RCVs applicable as aids in the serial monitoring of patients with specific diseases such as heart failure. The BV estimates are only applicable in subjects who abstained from oral intake due to the rapid and marked effects of fluids on copeptin physiology.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Glycopeptides , Humans , Glycopeptides/blood , Male , Female , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Middle Aged , Reference Values , Polyuria/blood , Polyuria/diagnosis , Polydipsia/blood , Polydipsia/diagnosis , Young Adult
5.
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci ; 61(2): 107-126, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37776896

ABSTRACT

Monoclonal gammopathy (MG) is a spectrum of diseases ranging from the benign asymptomatic monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to the malignant multiple myeloma. Clinical guidelines and laboratory recommendations have been developed to inform best practices in the diagnosis, monitoring, and management of MG. In this review, the pathophysiology, relevant laboratory testing recommended in clinical practice guidelines and laboratory recommendations related to MG testing and reporting are examined. The clinical guidelines recommend serum protein electrophoresis, serum immunofixation and serum free light chain measurement as initial screening. The laboratory recommendations omit serum immunofixation as it offers limited additional diagnostic value. The laboratory recommendations offer guidance on reporting findings beyond monoclonal protein, which was not required by the clinical guidelines. The clinical guidelines suggested monitoring total IgA concentration by turbidimetry or nephelometry method if the monoclonal protein migrates in the non-gamma region, whereas the laboratory recommendations make allowance for involved IgM and IgG. Additionally, several external quality assurance programs for MG protein electrophoresis and free light chain testing are also appraised. The external quality assurance programs show varied assessment criteria for protein electrophoresis reporting and unit of measurement. There is also significant disparity in reported monoclonal protein concentrations with wide inter-method analytical variation noted for both monoclonal protein quantification and serum free light chain measurement, however this variation appears smaller when the same method was used. Greater harmonization among laboratory recommendations and reporting format may improve clinical interpretation of MG testing.


Subject(s)
Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance , Paraproteinemias , Humans , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/diagnosis , Paraproteinemias/diagnosis , Laboratories , Immunoglobulin Light Chains
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38083572

ABSTRACT

Bilirubin is a biomarker for liver inflammation used to assess liver functions. Its concentration in the blood has been measured using a range of techniques both in clinical and point-of-care settings. Existing point-of-care devices utilize a spectral approach, namely dual-wavelength absorption measurement, to assess the blood bilirubin concentration. This work examines a novel temporal approach based on the photodegradation of bilirubin in the blood sample. It demonstrates that combining photodegradation characteristics with dual-wavelength measurement produces a more accurate technique for measuring blood bilirubin concentration. Tracking the evolution of absorbed light as a function of time represents a low-cost and simple way of improving the accuracy of point-of-care devices for bilirubin measurements.Clinical Relevance - This work demonstrates a facile and cheap bilirubin monitoring approach that may allow bilirubin monitoring applications in homes after a patient is discharged from a hospital, which may decrease the burden on patients, families, and clinicians.


Subject(s)
Bilirubin , Point-of-Care Systems , Humans , Biomarkers
7.
J Clin Pathol ; 76(11): 727-733, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37604683

ABSTRACT

Monoclonal gammopathy is a spectrum of disorders characterised by clonal proliferation of plasma cells or lymphocytes, which produce abnormal immunoglobulin or its components (monoclonal proteins). Monoclonal gammopathies are often categorised as low-tumour-burden diseases (eg, amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis), premalignant disorders (such as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smouldering multiple myeloma), and malignancies (eg, multiple myeloma and Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia). Such diversity of concentration and structure makes monoclonal protein a challenging clonal marker. This article provides an overview on initial laboratory testing of monoclonal gammopathy to guide clinicians and laboratory professionals in the selection and interpretation of appropriate investigations.


Subject(s)
Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance , Multiple Myeloma , Paraproteinemias , Precancerous Conditions , Humans , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Paraproteinemias/diagnosis
8.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 61(12): 2178-2185, 2023 11 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462507

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The ratio of tubular maximum reabsorption of phosphate to glomerular filtration rate (TmP/GFR) is used to evaluate renal phosphate transport. TmP/GFR is most probably calculated using the formula described by Kenny and Glen or obtained from the nomogram described by Walton and Bijvoet. Even though the calculation itself is well described, no attention has been given to its measurement uncertainty (MU). The aim of this study is to provide a procedure for evaluating the MU of the Kenny and Glen formula; a procedure which is based on the Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). METHODS: TmP/GFR is a quantity value calculated from the input of measured values for serum (plasma) phosphate and creatinine, plus measured values of urine phosphate and creatinine. Given the measurement uncertainty associated with these input quantities, the GUM describes the mathematical procedures required to determine the uncertainty of the calculated TmP/GFR. From a medical laboratory perspective, these input uncertainties are the standard deviations of the respective internal quality control estimates for serum and urine phosphate, plus serum and urine creatinine. RESULTS: Based on representative measurements for the input quantities and their associated standard uncertainties, the expanded relative uncertainty for a calculated TmP/GFR is approximately 3.0-4.5 %. CONCLUSIONS: With the continued relevance of the TmP/GFR procedure and the use of creatinine clearance as an estimate of GFR, the addition of an uncertainty estimate is important as an adjunct to this diagnostic procedure.


Subject(s)
Kidney Tubules , Phosphates , Humans , Creatinine , Uncertainty , Glomerular Filtration Rate
10.
Pathology ; 55(4): 525-530, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36894352

ABSTRACT

The variability between calibrations can be larger than the within calibration variation for some measurement procedures, that is a large CVbetween:CVwithin ratio. In this study, we examined the false rejection rate and probability of bias detection of quality control (QC) rules at varying calibration CVbetween:CVwithin ratios. Historical QC data for six representative routine clinical chemistry serum measurement procedures (calcium, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, thyrotrophin, prostate specific antigen and gentamicin) were extracted to derive the CVbetween:CVwithin ratios using analysis of variance. Additionally, the false rejection rate and probability of bias detection of three 'Westgard' QC rules (2:2S, 4:1S, 10X) at varying CVbetween:CVwithin ratios (0.1-10), magnitudes of bias, and QC events per calibration (5-80) were examined through simulation modelling. The CVbetween:CVwithin ratios for the six routine measurement procedures ranged from 1.1 to 34.5. With ratios >3, false rejection rates were generally above 10%. Similarly for QC rules involving a greater number of consecutive results, false rejection rates increased with increasing ratios, while all rules achieved maximum bias detection. Laboratories should avoid the 2:2S, 4:1S and 10X QC rules when calibration CVbetween:CVwithin ratios are elevated, particularly for those measurement procedures with a higher number of QC events per calibration.


Subject(s)
Laboratories , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Male , Humans , Calibration , Quality Control , Bias
14.
Mol Diagn Ther ; 27(3): 303-320, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36705912

ABSTRACT

The accuracy of diagnostic laboratory tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can impact downstream clinical procedures in managing and controlling the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To assess the effectiveness of laboratory tools for managing COVID-19 patients in low-income countries (LICs), we systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and CINHAL databases for reports published between January 2020 and June 2022. We found that 22 of 1303 articles reported the performance of various SARS-CoV-2 detection tools across 10 LICs. These tools were (1) real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR); (2) reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP); (3) rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs); (4) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); and (5) dot-blot immunoassay. The detection of COVID-19 is largely divided into two main streams-direct virus (antigen) detection and serology (immunoglobulin)-based detection. Point-of-care testing using antigen-based RDTs is preferred in LICs because of cost effectiveness and simplicity in the test procedures. The nucleic acid amplification technology (RT-PCR and RT-LAMP) has the highest diagnostic performance among the available tests, but it is not broadly used in this context due to costs and shortage of facilities/trained staff. The serology-based test method is affected by antibody interferences and varying amounts of SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins expressed at different stages of disease onset. We further discuss the effectiveness and shortcomings of each of these tools in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19. Using the LICs as the study model, our findings highlight ways to improve the quality and turnaround time of COVID-19 testing in resource-constrained settings, notably through local/international collaborative efforts to refine the molecular-based or immunoassay-based testing technologies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , COVID-19 Testing , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity
15.
Intern Emerg Med ; 18(1): 43-52, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36103084

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has rapidly evolved since it was first discovered in December 2019. We aimed to retrospectively review our experience with COVID-19 infection across 2020-2022, focusing on differences in laboratory markers at presentation. Consecutive adult patients admitted to hospital with confirmed COVID-19 infection were retrospectively reviewed across three periods (29/3/2020-29/9/2020, 16/8/2021-13/10/2021 and 1/1/2022-31/1/2022), correlating with the lineages B.1.338, Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.159), respectively. Laboratory findings of the first requested blood test within 24 h of presentation were recorded and correlated with patient outcome. The primary outcome was requirement for oxygen therapy at any point. Inflammatory markers, namely serum ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly lower on presentation during 2022 compared to 2021, corresponding to a milder disease course. More than 80% of 2022 patients had received 2 or more vaccine doses and fully vaccinated patients displayed significantly lower inflammatory markers at presentation. Using 2022 data, a multivariate prediction model was constructed to predict for oxygen requirement, with c-statistic 0.86. Patients in 2022, corresponding with the Omicron variant, displayed a milder disease course, even in hospitalised patients, with the majority not requiring oxygen and lower inflammatory markers. We constructed a simple-to-use risk prediction model with c-statistic 0.86 which may identify individuals who can be safely managed as outpatients in the era of highly transmissible variants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Australia , Disease Outbreaks , Disease Progression , Oxygen , Biomarkers
17.
J Pers Med ; 12(10)2022 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36294850

ABSTRACT

Abnormal coagulation and fibrinolysis contributes to the respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19. We aimed to explore the association of impaired fibrinolytic potential with disease severity and oxygen requirement in hospitalized patients. Adults admitted to hospital with confirmed COVID-19 infection between 1-31 January 2022 were included, corresponding to the first Omicron outbreak in Melbourne, Victoria. The first citrated plasma sample requested within 24 h of the patient's presentation was obtained and analyzed by the overall hemostatic potential (OHP) assay, a spectrophotometric assay in which fibrin formation (triggered by small amounts of thrombin (OCP)) and fibrinolysis (by the addition of thrombin and tissue plasminogen activator (OHP and OFP%)) were simultaneously measured. There were 266 patients (median 72 years, 52.9% male), of which 49.6% did not require oxygen therapy. COVID-19 severity and requirement for oxygen was significantly associated with higher OCP, OHP, and lower OFP%. Vaccinated individuals compared with non-vaccinated individuals had significantly lower OHP (16.5 vs. 23.1, p = 0.015) and higher OFP (72.0% vs. 65.1%, p = 0.005), as well as significantly lower AST, ferritin, LDH, CRP, and D-dimer. A multivariate model containing OHP was constructed with the outcome of oxygen requirement, with c-statistic of 0.85 (95%CI 0.81-0.90). In this pilot study, we show a significant correlation between OHP results and requirement for oxygen supplementation in hospitalized patients during a period dominated by the Omicron variant. The results were incorporated into a multivariate model that predicted for oxygen requirement, with high discriminative ability.

18.
J Pers Med ; 12(9)2022 Sep 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36143280

ABSTRACT

Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is an endogenous negative regulator of the renin-angiotensin system, a key factor in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). ACE2 is also used by SARS-CoV-2 for host cell entry. Given that COVID-19 is associated with hypercoagulability, it is timely to explore the potential relationship between plasma ACE2 activity and the coagulation profile. In this cross-sectional study, ACE2 activity and global coagulation assays (GCA) including thromboelastography, thrombin, and fibrin generation were measured in adult healthy controls (n = 123; mean age 41 ± 17 years; 35% male) and in patients with cardiovascular risk factors and/or disease (n = 258; mean age 65 ± 14 years; 55% male). ACE2 activity was significantly lower in controls compared to patients with cardiovascular risk factors and/or disease (median 0.10 (0.02, 3.33) vs. 5.99 (1.95, 10.37) pmol/mL/min, p < 0.001). Of the healthy controls, 48% had undetectable ACE2 activity. Controls with detectable ACE2 had lower maximum amplitude (p < 0.001). In patients with cardiovascular risk factors and/or disease, those in the 3rd tertile were older and male (p = 0.002), with a higher Framingham grade and increased number of cardiovascular risk factors (p < 0.001). In conclusion, plasma ACE2 activity is undetectable to very low in young healthy controls with minimal clinically relevant associations to GCA. Patients with cardiovascular risk factors and/or disease have increased plasma ACE2 activity, suggesting that it may be an important biomarker of endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis.

19.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 108(1): 33-41, 2022 12 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36179243

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC), renin, and aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) are used to screen for primary aldosteronism (PA). Substantial intra-individual variability of PAC and ARR using plasma renin activity in the context of usual antihypertensive therapy has been described, but there is no data on ARR variability calculated using direct renin concentration (DRC). OBJECTIVE: To describe the intra-individual variability of PAC, DRC, and ARR in the absence of interfering medications in patients with and without PA. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Hypertensive patients referred for investigation of PA, with at least 2 ARR measurements while off interfering medications. SETTING: Endocrine hypertension service of a tertiary center, from May 2017 to July 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PAC, DRC, and ARR variability was calculated as coefficient of variation (CV) and percent difference (PD). RESULTS: Analysis of 223 patients (55% female, median age 52 years), including 162 with confirmed PA, demonstrated high variability with a sample CV of 22-25% in the PAC and sample CV of 41% to 42% in the DRC and ARR in both the PA and non-PA groups. The degree of variability was substantially higher than the assays' analytical CV. Sixty-two patients (38%) with PA had at least one ARR below 70 pmol/L:mU/L (2.4 ng/dL:mU/L), a cut-off for first-line screening of PA. CONCLUSIONS: Significant intra-individual variability in PAC, DRC, and hence ARR occurs in a large proportion of patients being investigated for PA. These findings support the need for at least 2 ARR before PA is excluded or further investigated.


Subject(s)
Hyperaldosteronism , Hypertension , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Aldosterone , Renin , Hyperaldosteronism/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Hypertension/diagnosis
20.
Endocrine ; 77(1): 11-20, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35622194

ABSTRACT

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common and potentially curable form of secondary hypertension, affecting 5-10% of primary care patients with hypertension. Primary care physicians have an important role in initiating the screening for PA in patients with hypertension and referring to a specialist service depending on the screening test results. The currently recommended screening test for PA is the plasma aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR). Test results are influenced by medications so careful patient preparation is required including adjusting existing antihypertensive medications to avoid diagnostic errors. A range of laboratory method-dependent ARR thresholds are used for the screening of PA around the world. Periodic clinical audits and case reviews by clinicians and the laboratory may help refine the local thresholds. Patients with an abnormally elevated ARR should be referred to a specialist for confirmatory testing while patients with a high pre-test probability but a normal ARR could have a repeat test in view of the within-individual variability. Despite the heterogenous ARR thresholds, measuring the ARR is still more likely to detect PA than not screening at all.


Subject(s)
Hyperaldosteronism , Hypertension , Aldosterone , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Primary Health Care , Renin
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...