Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 47
Filter
3.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 45(9): 1031-1035, 2022 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36150987

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although several studies have tried to identify the causes of failure of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery, the ethmoid sinus remains an underestimated and little described source of failure. OBJECTIVE: To study anatomical relationship between the ethmoidal sinus, particularly the "Agger nasi" cell, with the lacrimal fossa in the North African population, little described in the literature. This study is based on the results of preoperative analysis of dacryo-computed tomography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analysis of preoperative computed tomography images of patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy over a 7-year period from January 2011 to December 2017. Anatomical relationships were studied according to the following classification: type I: No ethmoid cells located anteriorly to the posterior lacrimal crest on transverse images; type II: ethmoidal cells extending anteriorly to the posterior lacrimal crest, but not reaching the anterior edge of the lacrimal bone; Type III: ethmoidal cells located anterior to the lacrimal bone suture. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifteen preoperative computed tomography images were analyzed. The morphology of the ethmoid sinus was classified as type 1 in 33.5%, type 2 in 42.32% and type 3 in 24.18%. Computed tomography analysis was symmetrical in 87.5% and asymmetrical in 12.5%. CONCLUSION: During dacryocystorhinostomy, the surgeon must take into consideration type III, which can be present in 25% of cases. In the case of surgical failure, a dacryo-CT must be performed to rule out such anterior positioning of the ethmoid cells.


Subject(s)
Dacryocystorhinostomy , Humans , Dacryocystorhinostomy/methods , Ethmoid Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Ethmoid Sinus/surgery , Orbit , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Nose
6.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 44(9): 1313-1318, 2021 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34538511

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess functional and anatomical consequences of the delay in intravitreal injections for diabetic macular edema (DME) patients during the corona virus pandemic lockdown in Morocco as well as to evaluate factors associated with disease progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included DME patients who did not complete their scheduled intravitreal bevacizumab injections during the Lockdown period (March 20, 2020 to May 20, 2020). Data recorded included age, duration of diabetes, number of previous intravitreal injections, best-corrected visual acuity, and central macular thickness before and after the lockdown. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty four eyes of 104 patients were analyzed. 57.8% were male. The mean age was 59.4±9.04 years. The mean duration of delay of intravitreal injections was 57.3±6.7 days. The mean number of intravitreal bevacizumab injections received before the lockdown was 2.29±2.1. Worsening of visual acuity was noted in 44.8% of patients and was associated with a lower number of intravitreal injections performed prior to the lockdown (P=0.001) and with glycemic imbalance (P=0.04). An increase in central macular thickness was noted in 26.6% of patients and was associated with a lower number of intravitreal injections (P=0.038). CONCLUSION: The delay in intravitreal injections during the lockdown had negative effects on visual acuity and central macular thickness in eyes with DME. Prolonged delay in intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in diabetic patients should be avoided.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Macular Edema , Aged , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Communicable Disease Control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetic Retinopathy/complications , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Edema/diagnosis , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Macular Edema/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 44(4): 549-558, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33549353

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the improvement in visual acuity (VA), tolerance and quality of life of patients after scleral contact lens (SCL) fitting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a prospective observational study conducted from April 2016 to August 2017. Patients fitted with SCL were included. For the purpose of this study, we analyzed VA and quality of life score (NEI-VFQ25) after 6 months of use. RESULTS: We identified 98 eyes of 56 patients; the major indication for SCL fitting was keratoconus in 64.3%; the other indications were post-penetrating keratoplasty, other irregular astigmatism, severe ametropia and ocular surface disease. The mean follow-up was 10.71 months. The mean daily wearing time was 9.89±1.63 hours. Best corrected Visual acuity "BCVA" (baseline 1.11±0.37 in the right eye and 1.13±0.42 LogMar in the left eye) improved to 0.19±0.20 and 0.23±0.38 LogMar respectively in the right and left eyes after SCL wear (P=0.000). The scores on the various subscales of the NEI-VFQ 25 questionnaire were significantly higher 6 months after SCL fitting, with a mean score of 87.28±9.87 with SCL versus 39.94±11.33 without these lenses (P=0.000). In our group, no complications related to the SCL wear occurred, except for the occurrence of "loose conjunctival tissue" at the inferior limbus in one patient. DISCUSSION: Our results complement those of several large series published on this subject. The best visual acuities were reported after correction of irregular astigmatism, in particular keratoconus. Therefore, SCL fitting has become an alternative or a precursor to penetrating keratoplasty in patients with advanced keratoconus. In the case of ocular surface disease, in addition to the improvement in VA, the comfort and recovery of the homeostasis of the ocular surface is greater, with fewer wearing complications. Hence, their inclusion in the therapeutic arsenal for severe ocular surface disease alongside the conventional treatment options. CONCLUSION: SCL have proven their efficacy and safety in the optical correction of irregular corneas and in the management of ocular surface problems. Additional studies are needed to compare the many lenses currently available and assess optimal fitting strategies for each type of scleral lens for easier fitting procedures and better wearing comfort.


Subject(s)
Contact Lenses , Keratoconus , Humans , Keratoconus/therapy , Keratoplasty, Penetrating , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Sclera
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...