Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Public Health ; 1: 5, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11446904

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examined condom acquisition by persons in a hospital setting when single versus assorted brand name condoms were provided. METHODS: Condom receptacles were placed in exam rooms of two clinics. During Phase 1, a single brand name was provided; for Phase 2, assorted brand names were added. Number of condoms taken was recorded for each phase. RESULTS: For one clinic there was nearly a two-fold increase in number of condoms taken (Phase 1 to Phase 2); for the second clinic there was negligible difference in number of condoms taken. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of assorted brand name condoms, over a single brand name, can serve to increase condom acquisition. Locations of condoms and target population characteristics are related factors.


Subject(s)
Condoms/supply & distribution , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Social Marketing , Adolescent , Adult , Alaska , Condoms/classification , Condoms/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Internal Medicine , Male , Program Evaluation , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/complications , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications
2.
Vaccine ; 19(28-29): 4081-5, 2001 Jul 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11427285

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis B vaccination is recommended for all healthcare workers (HCW) at risk of exposure to infectious body fluids. However, the absolute duration of protection from immunization is unknown. The purpose of this randomized comparison trial was to determine how previously immunized HCW respond to different booster doses of hepatitis B vaccine. METHOD: Adult HCW (n=59) were classified by level of hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), either <10 milli-International Units per milliliter (mIU/ml) or 10-50 mIU/ml. Participants were then randomized to receive a 2.5 or 10 microg dose of hepatitis B vaccine. Evaluation of anti-HBs levels were conducted 10 to 14 days, one month and one year postbooster. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: All participants responded to the booster dose with increased anti-HBs levels. At 14 days, mean anti-HBs levels were significantly higher for those with higher levels at baseline (P=0.004) and those receiving the 10 microg dose (P=0.016). At one month, those with higher anti-HBs levels at baseline and those receiving the 10 microg dose were significantly higher (P<0.01 for both). At one year, the increase for the higher dose was no longer statistically significant when examined by itself (P=0.081); statistical significance (P=0.021) was achieved after adjusting for anti-HBs level at baseline. For all participants, the geometric mean anti-HBs level was 2618 mIU/ml at 14 days, 2175 mIU/ml at one month and 88.9 mIU/ml at one year. At all time points the increase in anti-HBs levels represented an increase over the geometric mean baseline level of anti-HBs (7.4 mIU/ml). Hepatitis B immunized adults responded to a booster dose of hepatitis B vaccine from 3 to 13 yr postvaccination series. Data support current recommendations that immunized HCW do not require periodic antibody testing or vaccine boosters.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B/immunology , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Adult , Female , Hepatitis B Antibodies/blood , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Immunization, Secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors
3.
J Occup Med ; 32(6): 508-12, 1990 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2380800

ABSTRACT

Hospital-based female pharmacists were asked about workplace practices and conditions, use of protective equipment, and formal hospital guidelines governing exposure to antineoplastic agents. Special preparation areas dedicated to antineoplastic agents were absent in 13.4% of the workplaces. Vertical laminar flow hoods were unavailable for 27.7% of the respondents. Although protective gloves were worn by the majority (87.9%), safety glasses and facial masks were used infrequently. More than 40% of the group reported skin contact with cytotoxic drugs at least once a month. Eighty-three percent of all respondents reported that their institution had a formal policy governing the handling of antineoplastic agents. Medical surveillance for exposed employees, however, was available in only 28% of the workplaces.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Pharmacists , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Protective Clothing/standards , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Environmental Exposure , Epidemiologic Factors , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Health Policy , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...