ABSTRACT
Background: Many patients in methadone treatment have difficulty achieving or maintaining drug abstinence, and many clinics have policies that lead to discharging these patients. We designed a pilot "Second Chance" (SC) program for patients scheduled to be discharged from other local methadone clinics to be transferred to our clinic. Aim: Determine whether SC patients' retention and opioid use is related to physical or mental health conditions, non-opioid substance use, or treatment features. Methods: From December 2012 to December 2014, this program enrolled 70 patients who were discharged from other clinics in the area; we were their last remaining option for methadone treatment. Unlike the clinic's standard policies, the treatment focus for SC patients was retention rather than abstinence. This program focused on connection to care (eg, psychiatric services) and enabled patients to continue receiving services despite ongoing substance use. Each patient was assessed at treatment entry and followed until June 2016 to evaluate outcomes. Results: SC patients receiving disability benefits (n = 37) vs. non-disabled (n = 33) had significantly (P < .05) higher rates of current DSM-IV Axis I psychiatric diagnosis (97% vs 70%), prescriptions for opioids (84% vs 55%) and benzodiazepines (65% vs 27%), and higher methadone doses at admission (58 vs 46 mg) but did not differ significantly in rates of 6-month or 1-year retention (77% and 56%, respectively) or all-drug use (39% positive urine drug screens). Methadone doses >65 mg predicted significantly longer retention and less opioid use, but these effects were not moderated by baseline characteristics. Conclusions: Patients in methadone treatment struggling to achieve abstinence may benefit from retention-oriented harm-reduction programs. Higher methadone doses can improve retention and opioid abstinence despite psychiatric comorbidities. Further work is needed to improve program implementation and outcomes in this complex population.
ABSTRACT
Objective This study examines methadone dose adjustment postpartum. Methods A retrospective study of women with methadone for opioid use treatment (OUT) during pregnancy was performed. Patient charts were reviewed and data were extracted. Methadone doses from five temporal data points for each patient were used: starting dose, day of delivery, and 1, 2, and 6 months postpartum. Results Over 26 months, 49 pregnancies to women using methadone for OUT were evaluated and 20 (41%) were included. The mean methadone starting dose was 47 mg, compared with 86 mg at the time of delivery. The mean dose postpartum remained unchanged from delivery and 75% of pregnancies required the same dose or higher 1 month postpartum. By 2 months postpartum, only 33% were able to decrease their methadone dose. Twelve pregnancies completed follow-up until 6 months postpartum; only 17% of patients were able to decrease their dose, with an overall mean dose decrease was 12%. There was no difference between the mean dose at delivery and the 6-month postpartum dose. Conclusion Patients using methadone for OUT during pregnancy achieved minimal dose decreases postpartum. Patients should be counseled that postpartum dose tapers may be challenging and about alternatives to methadone for OUT.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Substance abuse in pregnancy remains a major public health problem. Fetal teratogenicity results from the effect of these substances during fetal development, particularly when used in combination. This review will focus on and attempt to clarify the existing literature regarding the association of substance abuse on the development of congenital anomalies and the long-term implications in exposed offspring. METHODS: Systematic review of available English literature using the PubMed database of all peer-reviewed articles on the subject. RESULTS: A total of 128 articles were included in this review. Alcohol was the most common substance associated with fetal anomalies, particularly facial dysmorphisms and alterations in the central nervous system development. Adverse maternal environments associated with risky behaviors and lack of adequate prenatal care precludes the timely detection of fetal anomalies, confounding most studies linking causality. In addition, although methodological differences and limited availability of well-designed trials exist, substance abuse in pregnancy has been associated with adverse long-term outcomes in infant growth, behavior, cognition, language and achievement. CONCLUSION: The literature summarized in this review suggests that drug exposure during pregnancy may increase the risk of congenital anomalies and long-term adverse effects in exposed children and adolescents. These conclusions must be tempered by the many confounders associated with drug use. A multidisciplinary approach is paramount for appropriate counseling regarding the known immediate and long-term risks of substance abuse in pregnancy.
