Delirium in Pediatric Patients With Respiratory Insufficiency Requiring Noninvasive Ventilation.

Background: Delirium is associated with increased length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, in-hospital mortality, and cost. Independent predictors of delirium include age < 2 years, developmental delay, severity of illness, mechanical ventilation, and administration of benzodiazepines and anticholinergic medications. Although patients receiving noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may have been included in prior studies, there are no data specifically focusing on delirium in children receiving NIV. Our primary aim was to investigate the prevalence of delirium in patients on NIV in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and evaluate potentially modifiable risk factors for delirium. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study evaluating the prevalence of delirium as established by the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD). We evaluated PICU patients ≤ 18 years old with respiratory insufficiency requiring ≥ 48 h of NIV. Patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation were excluded from the analysis. Results: There were 202 patients that received ≥ 48 h of NIV during the study period. Of these patients, 43 patients had at least one CAPD score documented while on NIV. There were a total of 143 days on NIV and 137 days with CAPD documentation. The prevalence of delirium, defined as a CAPD score ≥ 9, was 67.4% (29 of 43 patients). Sixty-nine percent of the patients who experienced delirium received benzodiazepines, compared with 14% who did not experience delirium (P = 0.001). Most patients (83.7%) in this cohort received dexmedetomidine. Of patients who received dexmedetomidine and had delirium, 68% received benzodiazepines compared to 25% in the non-delirious group (P = 0.046). Conclusions: Delirium is common in young pediatric patients receiving NIV. As previously shown in the invasive mechanical ventilation population, benzodiazepine exposure continues to be a potentially modifiable risk factor for delirium.

Use and Outcomes of Nasotracheal Intubation Among Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation Across U.S. PICUs.

OBJECTIVES: The use and outcomes of nasotracheal intubation in pediatric patients requiring mechanical ventilation have not been quantified. Our goal is to identify prevalence of use, associated factors, and outcomes of nasotracheal versus orotracheal intubation in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using deidentified data from the Virtual Pediatric Systems database. Data from PICU admissions from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016 were analyzed. SETTING: One hundred twenty-one PICUs located within the United States. PATIENTS: PICU admissions requiring an endotracheal tube-either nasotracheal or orotracheal-were included. Those with a tracheostomy tube present at admission were excluded from the study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 121 PICUs included in the study, 64 PICUs (53%) had zero nasotracheal intubations during the reviewed time period. There were 12,088 endotracheal intubations analyzed, and 680 of them (5.6%) were nasotracheal. Of those patients nasotracheally intubated, most were under 2 years old (88.1%), and 82.2% of them were classified as a cardiac patient. Among these young cardiac patients, the rate of unplanned extubation was 0% in the nasotracheal intubated versus 2.1% in the orotracheal intubated group (p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS:: Nasotracheal intubation is used in a minority of U.S. PICUs and mainly among young cardiac patients. Nasotracheal intubation is associated with a lower rate of unplanned extubations in this patient population. Future prospective studies analyzing the benefits and complications of nasotracheal versus orotracheal intubation in pediatric patients requiring mechanical ventilation are indicated.