Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eval Program Plann ; 102: 102380, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37866132

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an analysis of survey data to examine the association between supervised structured mentoring and students' intent to pursue a career in science. Data were collected from students in the 10 Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) research training programs, developed through grants from the National Institutes of Health. Propensity score matching and multinomial logistic regression demonstrated that exposure to BUILD programs-meaning participation in undergraduate research, receipt of mentoring from a primary mentor, and/or participation as a funded scholar and/or associate of each BUILD site's training program-was associated with increased intent to pursue a science career. These findings have implications for STEM program evaluation and practice in higher education.


Subject(s)
Mentoring , Minority Groups , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Program Evaluation , Minority Groups/education , Mentors
2.
Eval Program Plann ; 100: 102343, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37393685

ABSTRACT

Evaluation policies are being written across the philanthropic sector. These policies offer rules and principles that are intended to guide evaluation practice. However, it is unclear what has motivated the development of evaluation policies and what impact, if any, they have on evaluation practice. Through interviews with 10 evaluation directors at foundations that have written evaluation policies, we identify the intent of these policies and their perceived influence in the philanthropic sector. We conclude with suggestions for future research on evaluation policy.


Subject(s)
Fund Raising , Humans , Program Evaluation , Policy , Intention
3.
Eval Program Plann ; 96: 102187, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36413889

ABSTRACT

Traditional modes of evaluation can be constraining when seeking to improve persistent societal problems within complex systems. Frameworks that assume stability and predictability may not match the system dynamics within which a program resides. This paper seeks to further evaluators' understanding of how to improve problems in complex systems by offering a "problem-bound" evaluation approach. This model is grounded in theoretical concepts from complexity science, complex adaptive systems, systems thinking, and improvement science. As such, it provides an agile and flexible framework for continually learning from emergent findings related to the problem. By offering this model, we seek to contribute to the limited knowledge base on how to apply systems change theoretical ideas in evaluation practice, along with practical implications regarding the evaluator's role.


Subject(s)
Program Evaluation , Humans
4.
New Dir Eval ; 2022(174): 69-78, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37292167

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the theoretical and conceptual frameworks used to guide the site-level evaluations of Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) programs, part of the Diversity Program Consortium (DPC), funded by the National Institutes of Health. We aim to provide an understanding of which theories informed the evaluation work of the DPC and how the frameworks guiding BUILD site-level evaluations are conceptually aligned with one another and with the consortium-level evaluation.

5.
Ethn Dis ; 30(4): 681-692, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32989368

ABSTRACT

Objective: The biomedical/behavioral sciences lag in the recruitment and advancement of students from historically underrepresented backgrounds. In 2014 the NIH created the Diversity Program Consortium (DPC), a prospective, multi-site study comprising 10 Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) institutional grantees, the National Research Mentoring Network (NRMN) and a Coordination and Evaluation Center (CEC). This article describes baseline characteristics of four incoming, first-year student cohorts at the primary BUILD institutions who completed the Higher Education Research Institute, The Freshmen Survey between 2015-2019. These freshmen are the primary student cohorts for longitudinal analyses comparing outcomes of BUILD program participants and non-participants. Design: Baseline description of first-year students entering college at BUILD institutions during 2015-2019. Setting: Ten colleges/universities that each received <$7.5mil/yr in NIH Research Project Grants and have high proportions of low-income students. Participants: First-year undergraduate students who participated in BUILD-sponsored activities and a sample of non-BUILD students at the same BUILD institutions. A total of 32,963 first-year students were enrolled in the project; 64% were female, 18% Hispanic/Latinx, 19% African American/Black, 2% American Indian/Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 17% Asian, and 29% White. Twenty-seven percent were from families with an income <$30,000/yr and 25% were their family's first generation in college. Planned Outcomes: Primary student outcomes to be evaluated over time include undergraduate biomedical degree completion, entry into/completion of a graduate biomedical degree program, and evidence of excelling in biomedical research and scholarship. Conclusions: The DPC national evaluation has identified a large, longitudinal cohort of students with many from groups historically underrepresented in the biomedical sciences that will inform institutional/national policy level initiatives to help diversify the biomedical workforce.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/education , Cultural Diversity , Government Programs/statistics & numerical data , Students/statistics & numerical data , Universities , Adolescent , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Educational Status , Female , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Income/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economics , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , White People/statistics & numerical data , Workforce , Young Adult , American Indian or Alaska Native/statistics & numerical data
6.
Child Welfare ; 91(2): 39-60, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23362613

ABSTRACT

The Prevention Initiative Demonstration Project, funded by the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS), is a community-specific strategy delivered through eight regional networks designed to address the full spectrum of community-based prevention. This article summarizes a strong and meaningful pattern of improvements found in the second year evaluation for three groups of families--those living in high-risk communities but not involved with DCFS, those being investigated by DCFS for possible child maltreatment, and those with open DCFS cases.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse/prevention & control , Child Health Services/methods , Child Health Services/organization & administration , Child Welfare/psychology , Family/psychology , Preventive Health Services/methods , Program Evaluation/methods , Child , Child Abuse/psychology , Community Networks , Humans , Los Angeles
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...