Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 109: 108446, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37494778

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Inguinal bladder hernia (IBH) accounts for <5 % of inguinal hernias. As to our knowledge, this is the first case report of a rare intraperitoneal IBH in Indonesia. CASE REPORT: Here we present a case report of a 58-year-old Indonesian male complaining of a groin mass on the right side since 1 year ago, accompanied by lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), two-stage micturition, lower abdominal discomfort and pain during urinating and coughing. Ultrasound revealed widened inguinal canal containing peritoneum and "teardrop" lesion at the inguinal continuing until the right scrotal. The patient was scheduled for open repair of inguinal hernia (herniorrhaphy) with tension-free mesh. Intraoperative findings include the entire bladder herniation located at intraperitoneal. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Symptoms of IBH include inguinal or scrotal swelling with or without pain, LUTS, two-stage micturition, to various symptoms owing to complications. Pre-operative imaging might help to confirm diagnosis. The definitive treatment of IBH is either reduction or resection of the herniated bladder followed by surgical repair (herniorrhaphy). CONCLUSION: IBH is rare but should be suspected in older males (≥50 years old), individuals with weak abdomino-pelvic musculature, and obesity. Pathologies of the bladder, such as bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), chronically distended bladder, and decreased bladder tone related to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) or bladder neck stricture can also increase risk of IBH. Treatment with open repair of inguinal hernia (herniorrhaphy) with tension-free mesh is the most common and preferred surgical approach.

2.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 109: 108495, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37459697

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Endometriosis is one of the most frequent gynecologic disorders, clinically confirmed or suspected in one of nine women by the age of 44 years. Its location of occurrence can be classified into intra and extra pelvic. Abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) is one of its rare location, with frequency of 0.04 to 5.5 %. Furthermore there are only a few cases of AWE in Indonesia that have been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we present two Indonesian patients at a General Hospital in Tangerang, Indonesia. The first patient, 26 years old, complained of an umbilical mass 2 years after caesarean section. The second patient, 36 years old, complained of an umbilical mass since 8 months, with no history of prior surgery. Both patients had pre-operative ultrasonography (US) and underwent wide local excision. Histopathology examination with presence of endometrial glandular components and endometrial-like stroma confirmed the diagnosis of AWE. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: AWE is defined as any endometrial tissue found superficial to the peritoneum, locating most commonly at umbilical, inguinal area, and anterior abdominal wall. Pre-operative diagnostic tools include abdominal ultrasonography (US) or abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scan. Since treatment with medications is usually not effective, surgical treatment is recommended, along with confirmation by histopathological examination. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of AWE should be suspected in all women with symptoms of an abdominal mass and cyclic pain, especially if the patient had history of surgery at the abdominal region. AWE is quite rare, but its symptoms can affect quality of life. Hence, a multi-disciplinary approach is necessary, with the strongly recommended treatment of wide local excision to prevent recurrence and malignant transformation.

3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(8): e32938, 2023 Feb 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36827017

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In malnourished patients with colorectal cancer, hypoalbuminemia is common and was proposed to determine the postoperative outcome of colorectal surgery. Mounting articles published but have not been evaluated. We aim to assess the predictive value of preoperative hypoalbuminemia in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS: We performed a literature search from PubMed, Euro PMC, and Cochrane with the terms serum albumin, hypoalbuminemia, prognosis, outcome, colorectal cancer, and neoplasm. We also hand-searched and included any relevant papers. Hypoalbuminemia is defined as plasma albumin level < 3.5 mg/dL. We restricted the included studies to English language and adults undergoing colectomy, laparotomy, laparoscopy, or abdominoperineal resection. Any types of articles were included, except an abstract-only publication and those that did not report the key exposure or outcome of interest. The key exposures were mortality, hospitalization time, and morbid conditions (thrombosis, surgical site infection, sepsis, and wound events). We pooled the odds ratio from each included literature as effect size. The Newcastle Ottawa scale and GRADE were used to determine the quality of each included study. RESULTS: Hereof 7 observational studies (236,480 individuals) were included. Our meta-analysis found that preoperative hypoalbuminemia can predict the postoperative outcome in colorectal cancer patients. Individuals with hypoalbuminemia were not associated with 30-day mortality (risk ratio [RR] 2.05 [0.72, 5.86], P = .18, I2 = 99%) but were associated with morbidity (RR 2.28 [1.78, 2.93], P < .00001, I2 = 87.5%), surgical complication (RR 1.69 [1.34, 2.13], P < .00001, I2 = 98%), and hospitalization (RR 2.21 [1.93, 2.52], P < .00001, I2 = 0%). According to newcastle ottawa scale, the included studies are of moderate to sound quality. CONCLUSIONS: The current systematic review and meta-analysis showed that preoperative hypoalbuminemia was significantly associated with morbidity, length of stay, and surgical complication but not mortality.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Hypoalbuminemia , Malnutrition , Adult , Humans , Hypoalbuminemia/complications , Prognosis , Malnutrition/complications , Colectomy/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Factors
4.
F1000Res ; 12: 188, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38919838

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in pregnant women. There has been a wide variance in clinical practice worldwide, with some favoring an antibiotic-only approach while others prefer surgery as the first-line management. Therefore, we designed the current analysis to synthesize the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of antibiotics versus surgery management. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, EuropePMC, and Cochrane Central from March 4, 1904 until November 25, 2022, to look for studies comparing antibiotics and surgery in pregnant patients with acute appendicitis. We only included studies that provided a comparison between the two treatments. We included preterm delivery, fetal loss, maternal death, and complications as outcomes. The results were compared using an odds ratio and 95% confidence interval. We also performed a sensitivity analysis by excluding studies with a serious risk of bias. Results: We included five non-randomized studies for the analysis. We found that patients in the antibiotic group had a lower risk of preterm labor (OR 0.63 [95% CI 0.43-0.92]; p 0.02) but a higher risk of complications (OR 1.79 [95% CI 1.19-2.69]; p 0.005). We did not find any difference in the other outcomes. Conclusion: The increased risk of complications should caution clinicians about using antibiotics as the first-line management. More studies are required to identify patients who would benefit the most before antibiotics could be adopted as a treatment for acute appendicitis in pregnant patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Appendicitis , Humans , Appendicitis/surgery , Appendicitis/drug therapy , Pregnancy , Female , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Appendectomy/adverse effects , Acute Disease
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL