Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 30(1): 63-6, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25731072

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is a common condition; it is often chronic and can be difficult to treat. Cyclosporine is used off-label to treat severe hand eczema; however, the evidence for this treatment is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To examine the drug survival of cyclosporine in a daily practice cohort of patients with chronic hand eczema. METHODS: This retrospective daily use study included hand eczema patients who were treated with cyclosporine between 01-06-1999 and 01-06-2014 in two Dutch university hospitals. Patient and treatment characteristics were retrospectively collected from medical charts. First treatment episodes were analysed by means of Kaplan-Meier drug survival curves. Possible determinants of drug survival were analysed by Cox regression models. Treatment effectiveness was analysed with a retrospective physician's global assessment. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were treated with cyclosporine. The median drug survival rate was 0.86 years (10.3 months). The overall drug survival rate after 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years were 61.7%, 45.2%, 18.6% and 13.9% respectively. Main reasons for discontinuation were adverse events, especially early in treatment, and ineffectiveness. After 3 months, a good response to treatment was recorded in 62.9% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Cyclosporine had a median drug survival of 10.3 months. Especially patients with recurrent vesicular hand eczema showed a good treatment response.


Subject(s)
Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Eczema/drug therapy , Hand Dermatoses/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Off-Label Use , Patch Tests , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Br J Dermatol ; 172(6): 1621-1627, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25683671

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Long-term data of ciclosporin A (CsA) treatment in daily practice in patients with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To perform a detailed analysis of drug survival, which is the length of time a patient continues to take a drug, for CsA in a long-term daily practice cohort of patients with AD. The secondary objective was to identify determinants of drug survival. METHODS: Data were extracted from a retrospective cohort of patients treated with CsA for AD. Drug survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Determinants of drug survival were analysed using uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses with backward selection. RESULTS: In total, 356 adult patients were analysed (386 patient-years). The overall drug survival rates were 34%, 18%, 12% and 4% after 1, 2, 3 and 6 years, respectively. Reasons for discontinuation were controlled AD (26·4%), side-effects (22·2%), ineffectiveness (16·3%), side-effects plus ineffectiveness (6·2%) or other reasons (11·0%). Older age was associated with a decreased drug survival related to controlled AD [hazard ratio (HR) 0·91]. Older age was also associated with a decreased drug survival related to side-effects (HR 1·14). An intermediate-to-high starting dose (> 3·5-5·0 mg kg(-1) daily) was associated with an increased drug survival related to ineffectiveness (HR 0·63). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study on drug survival for CsA treatment in AD. Older age was associated with decreased drug survival related to controlled AD and side-effects. An intermediate-to-high starting dose was associated with an increased drug survival related to ineffectiveness.


Subject(s)
Cyclosporine/administration & dosage , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Adult , Age Factors , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Substitution , Female , Humans , Long-Term Care , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 29(5): 940-7, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25220568

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis is a well-known cause of hand eczema, although the influence of contact allergens on different clinical types of hand eczema remains still unclear. OBJECTIVE: To identify most common positive tested allergens among hand eczema patients and to define the relation between specific contact allergies and clinical types of hand eczema according to the guidelines of the Danish Contact Dermatitis Group (DCDG). METHODS: We included 1571 hand eczema subjects who were patch tested from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2013. They were retrospectively classified according to the guidelines of the DCDG into six clinical types: recurrent vesicular hand eczema, chronic fissured hand eczema, hyperkeratotic palmar eczema, pulpitis, interdigital eczema and nummular hand eczema according to a newly developed flow chart. The prevalence of sensitizations and association with clinical type, atopic dermatitis, age and gender were studied. RESULTS: A total of 1395 subjects were classified into one of the six clinical types. The most frequently found clinical types were recurrent vesicular hand eczema (39.7%) and chronic fissured hand eczema (35.5%). Subjects with recurrent vesicular hand eczema were significantly more likely to have a contact allergy (OR 1.55), whereas subjects with hyperkeratotic palmar eczema and pulpitis were less likely to be sensitized (OR 0.51; OR 0.44). Overall, metals (nickel sulphate, cobalt chloride), fragrances and preservatives (methylchloroisothiazoline/methylisothiazoline, methyldibromoglutaronitrile) were the most frequent sensitizers in patients with hand eczema. This did not deviate in the different clinical types, although subjects with recurrent vesicular hand eczema were significantly more frequently sensitized to nickel sulphate and other allergens compared to other clinical types of hand eczema. CONCLUSION: In the diagnostic work up of hand eczema subjects with recurrent vesicular hand eczema should be patch tested, especially women of older age, although the need for patch testing in males with hyperkeratotic palmar eczema might be less imperative.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/classification , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Dermatoses/classification , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/pathology , Female , Hand Dermatoses/pathology , Humans , Male , Metals/toxicity , Middle Aged , Patch Tests , Perfume/adverse effects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...