Low incidence of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with hematological malignancies receiving novel anticancer drugs: A report from a high epidemic area and literature review.

BACKGROUND: More and more novel anticancer drugs have been approved for patients with hematological malignancies in recent years, but HBV reactivation (HBV-R) data in this population is very scarce. This study aimed to evaluated HBV-R risk in patients with hematological malignancies receiving novel anticancer drugs. METHODS: HBV markers and serum HBV DNA levels of patients with hematological malignancies receiving novel anticancer drugs in a tertiary cancer hospital were retrospectively collected. HBV-R risk in the whole cohort and subgroups was described. The relevant literature was reviewed to make a pooled analysis. RESULTS: Of 845 patients receiving novel anticancer drugs, 258 (30.5%) were considered at risk for HBV-R. The median duration of exposure to novel drugs was 5.6 (0.1-67.6) months. The incidence of HBV-R was 2.1% in patients with past HBV infection without prophylactic antiviral treatment (PAT) and 1.2% in all patients at risk of HBV-R. In a pooled analysis of 11 studies with 464 patients, the incidence of HBV-R was 2.4% (95% CI: 1.3-4.2) in all at-risk patients receiving novel anticancer drugs and 0.6% (95% CI: 0.03-3.5) in patients with anticancer drugs plus PAT. The incidence of death due to HBV-R was 0.4% (95% CI: 0.1-1.6) in all at-risk patients and 18.2% (95% CI: 3.2-47.7) in patients with HBV-R. CONCLUSION: Most episodes of HBV-R are preventable, and most cases with HBV-R are manageable. We recommend that novel anticancer drugs should not be intentionally avoided when treating cancer patients with HBV infection.

Combining PD-1 Inhibitor Nivolumab with Radiotherapy Successfully Treated a Patient with Refractory Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is relatively infrequent and generally has a good prognosis with standard immunochemotherapy. However, treatment options are limited for patients with relapsed/refractory PMBCL who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation. In this report, we treated a refractory PMBCL patient, who did not respond to salvage chemotherapy, with combined nivolumab and radiotherapy. The patient achieved a complete remission with mild adverse reactions and has survived without relapse 2 years after treatment.

Camrelizumab plus apatinib successfully treated a patient with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Aim: Advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a lethal disease with poor response to conventional chemotherapy. Immunotherapy showed better activity than chemotherapy in late-line treatment. However, the rate and duration of response are far from satisfactory. The efficacy of an anti-angiogenic agent combined with immunotherapy for ESCC is unknown. Results: A patient with ESCC experienced disease relapse after chemo-radiotherapy. The disease progressed after combined chemotherapy. A combination regimen of the PD-1 inhibitor camrelizumab and the anti-angiogenic agent apatinib was administered. The patient achieved a PET/CT-confirmed durable complete response with mild toxicity. Conclusion: The PD-1 inhibitor combined with the anti-angiogenic agent is effective and safe for the treatment of ESCC. This regimen is worth investigation in clinical trials.

A Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Chemotherapy Plus Anlotinib vs Chemotherapy Alone as Second- or Third-Line Salvage Treatment for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Anlotinib is a newly developed oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor. We retrospectively evaluated the toxicity and clinical efficacy of chemotherapy combined with anlotinib versus chemotherapy alone for metastatic/advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients who failed first- or second-line systemic treatment in China. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective trial, ninety-four advanced NSCLC patients received chemotherapy combined with anlotinib (n = 41) or chemotherapy alone (n = 53) in Henan Cancer Hospital. We recorded the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: In the anlotinib plus chemotherapy group, eleven patients (27%) achieved a PR (partial response), and twenty-one patients (51%) achieved SD (stable disease), with an ORR of 27% and a DCR of 78%. In the chemotherapy alone group, eight patients (15%) achieved a PR, and nineteen patients (36%) had SD, with an ORR of 15% and a DCR of 51%. The ORR in the combination arm was slightly, but not obviously, higher than that in the chemotherapy arm (27% vs 15%, p > 0.05). In addition, the DCR was significantly higher in the combination arm than in the chemotherapy alone arm (78% vs 51%, p=0.007). At the end of follow-up, patients in the combination arm had a 1.5-month longer median PFS than patients in the chemotherapy arm; this difference was statistically significant (5.0 vs 3.5, p=0.002). The median OS was not achieved at the final analysis. The hematological and nonhematological toxicities were well tolerated and controlled. In general, most toxicity was limited to grade I or II, well tolerated and controlled. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that anlotinib combined with chemotherapy may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for advanced NSCLC in patients who fail first- or second-line therapy.

Safety and Efficacy of Chemotherapy Combined with Anlotinib Plus Anlotinib Maintenance in Chinese Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Anlotinib, a newly developed oral small-molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been shown to have encouraging activity against sarcoma. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of chemotherapy combined with anlotinib plus anlotinib maintenance in advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients in a real-world setting in China. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected the medical data of thirty-two patients with advanced/metastatic STS who received chemotherapy combined with anlotinib plus anlotinib maintenance therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. The progression-free rates (PFRs) at three and six months, the progression-free survival (PFS) time, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: On the basis of investigator assessments, two patients (6%) achieved CR (complete response) and nine patients (28%) achieved PR (partial response), with an ORR of 34%. Eleven patients (34%) achieved SD (stable disease), and ten patients (31%) achieved PD (progression disease), with a DCR of 69%. The progression-free rates (PFRs) at three and six months were 81% and 69%, respectively. The median PFS time was 8.2 months. The hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were manageable. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (9%), leukopenia (19%), thrombocytopenia (3%), anemia (6%), anorexia (6%), vomiting (3%), and hypertension (6%). The combination therapy was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that chemotherapy combined with anlotinib plus anlotinib maintenance therapy had good efficacy and resulted in more favorable survival with good tolerance among patients with advanced/metastatic STS.

L-Type Cav 1.2 Calcium Channel-α-1C Regulates Response to Rituximab in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: One third of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) succumb to the disease partly due to rituximab resistance. Rituximab-induced calcium flux is an important inducer of apoptotic cell death, and we investigated the potential role of calcium channels in rituximab resistance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The distinctive expression of calcium channel members was compared between patients sensitive and resistant to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone (RCHOP) regimen. The observation was further validated through mechanistic in vitro and in vivo studies using cell lines and patient-derived xenograft mouse models. RESULTS: A significant inverse correlation was observed between CACNA1C expression and RCHOP resistance in two independent DLBCL cohorts, and CACNA1C expression was an independent prognostic factor for RCHOP resistance after adjusting for International Prognostic Index, cell-of-origin classification, and MYC/BCL2 double expression. Loss of CACNA1C expression reduced rituximab-induced apoptosis and tumor shrinkage. We further demonstrated direct interaction of CACNA1C with CD20 and its role in CD20 stabilization. Functional modulators of L-type calcium channel showed expected alteration in rituximab-induced apoptosis and tumor suppression. Furthermore, we demonstrated that CACNA1C expression was directly regulated by miR-363 whose high expression is associated with worse prognosis in DLBCL. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the role of CACNA1C in rituximab resistance, and modulating its expression or activity may alter rituximab sensitivity in DLBCL.