Treatment persistence in and cost of therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C: Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin versus peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin.

PURPOSE: Treatment persistence and cost of therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treated with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin and peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin were evaluated. METHODS: This retrospective database analysis used eligibility, pharmacy, and medical claims data from a large U.S. health plan for patients with CHC treated with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin and peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin from January 2002 through June 2006. For the purposes of this analysis, the study population included all hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes. Comparable groups for assessment of outcomes were constructed using propensity score matching to reduce the effect of known sources of bias. Outcome variables included treatment persistence and annualized overall and HCV-attributable health care costs. RESULTS: A total of 1783 matched pairs were analyzed. Compared with patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin, patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin were 18% less likely to be persistent with therapy at week 48 (p = 0.013). During the first six months of follow-up, mean all-cause costs (p = 0.0368) and HCV-attributable costs (p < 0.0001) were significantly lower for peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin than for peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin. Mean annualized all-cause costs (p = 0.0060) and HCV-attributable costs (p = 0.0167) over the entire follow-up period were significantly lower for patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin versus peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin. CONCLUSION: Analysis of information from a health care claims database suggests that treating CHC with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin may improve treatment persistence and help reduce the health care costs imposed by CHC compared with treatment with peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin.

Maintenance fluconazole therapy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis.

BACKGROUND: No safe and convenient regimen has proved to be effective for the management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. METHODS: After inducing clinical remission with open-label fluconazole given in three 150-mg doses at 72-hour intervals, we randomly assigned 387 women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis to receive treatment with fluconazole (150 mg) or placebo weekly for six months, followed by six months of observation without therapy. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of women in clinical remission at the end of the first six-month period. Secondary efficacy measures were the clinical outcome at 12 months, vaginal mycologic status, and time to recurrence on the basis of Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Weekly treatment with fluconazole was effective in preventing symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis. The proportions of women who remained disease-free at 6, 9, and 12 months in the fluconazole group were 90.8 percent, 73.2 percent, and 42.9 percent, as compared with 35.9 percent, 27.8 percent, and 21.9 percent, respectively, in the placebo group (P< 0.001). The median time to clinical recurrence in the fluconazole group was 10.2 months, as compared with 4.0 months in the placebo group (P<0.001). There was no evidence of fluconazole resistance in isolates of Candida albicans or of superinfection with C. glabrata. Fluconazole was discontinued in one patient because of headache. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term weekly treatment with fluconazole can reduce the rate of recurrence of symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis. However, a long-term cure remains difficult to achieve.

A randomized and blinded multicenter trial of high-dose fluconazole plus placebo versus fluconazole plus amphotericin B as therapy for candidemia and its consequences in nonneutropenic subjects.

A randomized, blinded, multicenter trial was conducted to compare fluconazole (800 mg per day) plus placebo with fluconazole plus amphotericin B (AmB) deoxycholate (0.7 mg/kg per day, with the placebo/AmB component given only for the first 5-6 days) as therapy for candidemia due to species other than Candida krusei in adults without neutropenia. A total of 219 patients met criteria for a modified intent-to-treat analysis. The groups were similar except that those who were treated with fluconazole plus placebo had a higher mean (+/- standard error) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (16.8+/-0.6 vs. 15.0+/-0.7; P=.039). Success rates on study day 30 by Kaplan-Meier time-to-failure analysis were 57% for fluconazole plus placebo and 69% for fluconazole plus AmB (P=.08). Overall success rates were 56% (60 of 107 patients) and 69% (77 of 112 patients; P=.043), respectively; the bloodstream infection failed to clear in 17% and 6% of subjects, respectively (P=.02). In nonneutropenic subjects, the combination of fluconazole plus AmB was not antagonistic compared with fluconazole alone, and the combination trended toward improved success and more-rapid clearance from the bloodstream.