Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 23(34): 6287-6293, 2017 Sep 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28974895

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the association of body mass index (BMI) with the overall survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of PDAC patients diagnosed in the National Cancer Center of China between January 1999 and December 2014 was performed. These patients were categorized into four BMI groups (< 18.5, 18.5-22.9, 23-27.4 and ≥ 27.5 kg/m2). χ2 tests for comparison of the proportions of categorical variables, and Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables were employed. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meyer method. Their HRs of mortality and 95%CIs were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: With a median age of 59.6 years (range: 22.5-84.6 years), in total 1783 PDAC patients were enrolled in this study. Their mean usual BMI was 24.19 ± 3.53 for the whole cohort. More than half of the patients (59.3%) experienced weight loss during the disease onset and progression. Compared with healthy-weight individuals, newly diagnosed patients who were overweight or obese had more severe weight loss during their disease onset and progression (P < 0.001). Individuals who were overweight or obese were associated with positive smoking history (P < 0.001). A significant difference in comorbidity of diabetes (P = 0.044) and coronary artery disease (P < 0.001) was identified between high BMI and normal-weight patients. After a median follow-up of 8 mo, the survival analysis showed no association between BMI and the overall survival (P = 0.90, n = 1783). When we stratified the whole cohort by pancreatic cancer stage, no statistically significant association between BMI and overall survival was found for resectable (P = 0.99, n = 217), unresectable locally advanced (P = 0.90, n = 316) and metastatic patients (P = 0.88, n = 1250), respectively. The results did not change when we used the BMI at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Our results showed no significance of BMI for the overall survival of PDAC patients.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , China/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Overweight/epidemiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Thinness/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
World J Gastroenterol ; 21(14): 4255-60, 2015 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25892876

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate the prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio (MLNR) in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) patients undergoing radical resection. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with ECC were enrolled. Associations between various clinicopathologic factors and prognosis were investigated by Kaplan-Meier analyses. The Cox proportional-hazards model was used for multivariate survival analysis. RESULTS: The overall three- and five-year survival rates were 47.26% and 23.99%, respectively. MLNR of 0, 0-0.2, 0.2-0.5, and > 0.5 corresponded to five-year survival rates of 28.59%, 21.60%, 18.84%, and 10.03%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that degree of tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, MLNR, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and margin status were closely associated with postoperative survival in ECC patients (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that MLNR and TNM stage were independent prognostic factors after pancreaticoduodenectomy (HR = 2.13, 95%CI: 1.45-3.11; P < 0.01; and HR = 1.97, 95%CI: 1.17-3.31; P = 0.01, respectively). The median survival time for MLNR > 0.5, 0.2-0.5, 0-0.2, and 0 was 15 mo, 24 mo, 23 mo, and 35.5 mo, respectively. There were statistical differences in survival time between patients with different MLNR (χ(2) = 15.38; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: MLNR is an independent prognostic factor for ECC patients after radical resection and is useful for predicting postoperative survival.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Cholangiocarcinoma/secondary , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Adult , Aged , Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality , Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Cell Differentiation , Chi-Square Distribution , Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality , Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Predictive Value of Tests , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...