ABSTRACT
With increasing awareness of water sinks as potential sources of outbreaks and transmission of multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in intensive care units (ICUs), there is growing interest in water-free patient care systems. This systematic review reviewed and synthesized available evidence on the effectiveness of sink removal with or without water-free activities in the ICU environment to reduce water-borne healthcare-associated infections. We searched five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase) for studies published from 1st January 1980 to 2nd April 2024 that examined water-less or water-free activities in the ICU to reduce healthcare-associated infections and patient colonization. Of 2075 articles, seven quasi-experimental studies (total: 332 patient beds) met the study selection criteria. Six of these seven studies (85.7%) were based in adult ICUs; one (14%) was in a neonatal ICU. Five of seven sites (71.4%) implemented water-less interventions after an outbreak. Water-free alternatives used included water-less bath products (six of seven; 85.7%), bottled water for consumption (three of seven; 42.9%), oral care (three of seven; 42.9%) and dissolving of oral medication (four of seven; 57.1%), designated 'contaminated' sink outside of patient and medication preparation areas for disposal of wastewater (four of seven; 57.1%). Implicated pathogens studied included MDR Gram-negative bacteria (four of seven; 57.1%), MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa only (two of seven; 28.6%), and pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTB) (one of seven; 14.3%). Five of seven (71.4%) studies reported outbreak cessation. Preliminary evidence, from a limited number of studies of which the majority were conducted in an outbreak setting, suggest that sink removal and other water-free interventions in the ICU helped terminate outbreaks involving taps and decrease hospital-onset respiratory isolation of pulmonary NTB.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Implementation of waterless care, including removal of sinks from patient care areas, is an emerging approach to reduce waterborne infections in high-risk areas such as intensive care units (ICUs). This approach, however, requires significant changes from traditional infection control practices and acceptance by healthcare workers (HCWs) for successful transition. AIM: To explore the knowledge, attitudes, practices (KAPs), and perceived challenges of HCWs who transitioned from working in a unit with standard infection control practices to one with waterless ICU care practices. METHODS: The study was conducted using a customized 30-item self-reported survey instrument administered to HCWs working in tertiary neonatal units at a single hospital. FINDINGS: Participation rate was 88.6% (101/114), comprising 66.3% (67/101) nurses, 31.0% (31/101) doctors, and 3.0% (3/101) allied health professionals; 90.1% (91/101) had positive attitudes and 53.5% (54/101) had good knowledge regarding waterless ICU care; 83.1% (84/101) followed the appropriate practice of hand hygiene when their hands were visibly soiled. Main challenges with waterless ICU care were perceived compromise of personal (46.5% (47/101)) and patient (22.8% (23/101)) hygiene. A total of 43.6% (44/101) reported an increase in skin-related conditions: 10.9% (11/101) had to visit a doctor for this reason, of whom 64.0% (7/11) had pre-existing skin conditions. CONCLUSION: Despite overall good attitudes and practices toward waterless ICU care, HCWs may have specific concerns related to hygiene and skin conditions which need to be addressed. For units transiting to waterless ICU care, similar surveys may provide valuable information by identifying gaps in KAP to improve compliance.
