SINGLE-01: a randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and depth of insertion of single- and double-balloon enteroscopy by using a novel method to determine insertion depth.

BACKGROUND: Single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) was introduced as an alternative to double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) for the investigation and management of small-bowel conditions. To date, there is only 1 randomized, controlled trial comparing SBE and DBE in a Western population. OBJECTIVE: To compare the 2 instruments in a Western population to assess for differences in clinical outcomes and insertion depth (ID). A novel method to determine ID by counting folds on withdrawal was used. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: University hospitals in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. PATIENTS: Patients with suspected or proven small-bowel disease. INTERVENTIONS: SBE and DBE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The primary endpoint was diagnostic yield (DY). Secondary endpoints were therapeutic yield (TY), procedure times, and ID. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were screened, and 107 patients were enrolled between July 2008 and June 2010, in whom 119 procedures were undertaken (53 SBEs and 66 DBEs). DY was 57% for SBE and 53% for DBE (P = .697). TY was 32% for SBE and 26% for DBE (P = .490). The median enteroscopy times were identical for SBE and DBE at 60 minutes. The mean ID by the fold-counting method for antegrade procedures was 201.1 folds for SBE and 258.6 folds for DBE (P = .046). After multiple comparisons adjustment, this difference did not reach statistical significance. Mean IDs by using the visual estimation method for SBE and DBE were, respectively, 72.1 cm and 75.2 cm (P = .835) for retrograde procedures and 203.8 cm and 234.1 cm (P = .176) for antegrade procedures. LIMITATIONS: Unable to reach target sample size, mostly single-center recruitment, novel method to determine ID, which requires further validation. CONCLUSIONS: SBE has DY, TY, and procedure times similar to those of DBE. There were no statistically significant differences in ID between SBE and DBE. By using the fold-counting method for antegrade procedures, the estimated IDs for SBE and DBE were 201.1 folds versus 258.6 folds (P = .046; P = not significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons). ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12609000917235.).

Meta-analysis of narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection.

BACKGROUND: At colonoscopy, missed adenomas have been well documented at approximately 22%. The challenge is in reducing this miss rate. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) has been extensively evaluated in prospective, randomized, controlled studies for polyp detection. Sample-size calculations show us that these studies may be underpowered, and hence a meta-analysis is required. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether use of NBI enhances the detection of adenomas. DESIGN: Meta-analyses were conducted of 7 studies using NBI for adenoma detection rate. MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases were searched by using a combination of the following terms: "colonoscopy," "NBI," and "electronic chromoendoscopy." PATIENTS: There was a total of 2936 patients in the NBI studies. INTERVENTIONS: Prospective, randomized trials of NBI versus standard white-light colonoscopy (WLC) were conducted. We excluded spray chromoendoscopy studies and studies of inflammatory bowel disease and polyposis syndromes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Adenoma and polyp detection rates and the number of polyps and adenomas detected per person. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the overall adenoma detection rate with the use of NBI or WLC (36% vs 34%; P = .413 [relative risk 1.06; 95% CI, 0.97-1.16]), and there was no statistically significant difference in polyp detection rate by using NBI or WLC (37% vs 35%; P = .289 [relative risk 1.22; 95% CI, 0.85-1.76]). When the number of adenomas and polyps per patient was analyzed, no significant difference was found between NBI and WLC (0.645 vs 0.59; P = .105 and 0.373 vs 0.348; P = .139 [weighted mean difference 0.19; 95% CI, ∞0.06 to 0.44], respectively). LIMITATION: Variability in NBI studies can reduce the accuracy of this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: NBI did not increase adenoma or polyp detection rates.