Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10571, 2024 05 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720025

ABSTRACT

Diminished cognitive and physical functions negatively affect the daily functions of individuals. Although combined cognitive and physical training prevents instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) disability in older adults, no predictive model or mediation analysis of IADL after combined training exists. This study aims to employ prediction and mediation analysis to identify the predictors of IADL performance and to elucidate the mediators of the association between baseline global cognition and subsequent IADL performance following combined cognitive and physical training. This study involved 177 participants aged 60 years and older who underwent combined training. Cognitive function was measured with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Color Trails Test, Word List, and a dual task; physical function with the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test; daily function with the Lawton IADL Scale. We conducted regression analyses to identify the predictors of IADL performance, and mediation analysis to examine whether DSST and TUG mediate the relationship between MoCA and IADL. The pre-intervention DSST and TUG were significant independent predictors of post-intervention IADL. The association between the pre-intervention MoCA and post-intervention IADL was mediated by pre-intervention DSST and TUG. This study highlighted the importance of measuring and improving processing speed and functional mobility before and during interventions to enhance IADL outcomes.Trial registration: NCT03619577, 23/07/2018; NCT04689776, 29/12/2020.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Cognition , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Cognition/physiology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Mediation Analysis , Treatment Outcome
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 23(1): 663, 2023 10 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37845603

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) are critical indices to understand whether observed improvement represents a meaningful improvement after intervention. Although simultaneous cognitive-exercise training (SCET; e.g., performing memory tasks while cycling) has been suggested to enhance the cognitive function of older adults, responsiveness and MCID have not been established. Hence, we aimed to estimate responsiveness and MCIDs of two dual task performance involving cognition and hand function in older adults with and without cognitive impairment and to compare the differences in responsiveness and MCIDs of the two dual task performance between older adults with and without cognitive impairment. METHODS: A total of 106 older adults completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and two dual tasks before and after SCET. One dual task was a combination of Serial Sevens Test and Box and Block Test (BBT), and the other included frequency discrimination and BBT. We used effect size and standardized response mean to indicate responsiveness and used anchor- and distribution-based approaches to estimating MCID ranges. When conducting data analysis, all participants were classified into two cognitive groups, cognitively healthy (Montreal Cognitive Assessment ≥ 26) and cognitively impaired (Montreal Cognitive Assessment < 26) groups, based on the scores of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment before SCET. RESULTS: In the cognitively healthy group, Serial Seven Test performance when tasked with BBT and BBT performance when tasked with Serial Seven Test were responsive to SCET (effect size = 0.18-0.29; standardized response mean = 0.25-0.37). MCIDs of Serial Seven Test performance when tasked with BBT ranged 2.09-2.36, and MCIDs of BBT performance when tasked with Serial Seven Test ranged 3.77-5.85. In the cognitively impaired group, only frequency discrimination performance when tasked with BBT was responsive to SCET (effect size = 0.37; standardized response mean = 0.47). MCIDs of frequency discrimination performance when tasked with BBT ranged 1.47-2.18, and MCIDs of BBT performance when tasked with frequency discrimination ranged 1.13-7.62. CONCLUSIONS: Current findings suggest that a change in Serial Seven Test performance when tasked with BBT between 2.09 and 2.36 corrected number (correct responses - incorrect responses) should be considered a meaningful change for older adults who are cognitively healthy, and a change in frequency discrimination performance when tasked with BBT between 1.47 and 2.18 corrected number (correct responses - incorrect responses) should be considered a meaningful change for older adults who are cognitively impaired. Clinical practitioners may use these established MCIDs of dual tasks involving cognition and hand function to interpret changes following SCET for older adults with and without cognitive impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04689776, 30/12/2020.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction , Minimal Clinically Important Difference , Aged , Humans , Cognition/physiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Cognitive Dysfunction/therapy , Exercise/psychology , Task Performance and Analysis
3.
Digit Health ; 9: 20552076231203633, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37744745

ABSTRACT

Objective: Combined physical (PHY) and cognitive (COG) training in sequential (SEQ) and simultaneous (SIMUL) sessions may delay the progression of cognitive impairment. To date, no study has directly compared in older adults with cognitive impairment the effects of COG training, PHY training, SEQ motor-cognitive training and SIMUL motor-cognitve training on specific indices of cognitive performance and activities of daily living (ADL). The purpose of this study was to determine whether SEQ and SIMUL motor-cognitive training can improve treatment outcomes compared with PHY or COG training alone. We also aimed to compare the effects of SEQ versus SIMUL motor-cognitive training on cognitive functions and instrumental ADL (IADL) in older adults with cognitive impairment. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted. Eighty older adults with cognitive impairment were randomly assigned to COG, PHY, SEQ or SIMUL training groups. The intervention consisted of 90-min training sessions, totaling 36 sessions. Outcome measures were the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, three subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) and the Lawton IADL scale. Results: Significant interaction effects between group and time were found in WMS-spatial span (p = 0.04) and WMS-word lists (p = 0.041). For WMS-spatial span, the SIMUL group showed outperformed the COG (p = 0.039), PHY (p = 0.010) and SEQ groups (p = 0.017). For WMS-word lists, the SEQ group improve more than COG (p = 0.013), PHY (p = 0.030) and SIMUL (p = 0.019) groups. No significant differences were found in IADL performance among four groups (p = 0.645). Conclusions: Our study showed SEQ and SIMUL motor-cognitive training led to more pronounced improvements in visuospatial working memory or verbal memory compared with isolated COG or PHY training for community-based older adults with cognitive impairment. For enhancing effects on IADL, we suggest the use of sensitive measurement tools and context-enriched cognitive training involving real-life task demands.

4.
BMC Geriatr ; 23(1): 94, 2023 02 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36788482

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The effects of combined training can be affected by training characteristics such as frequency, session length, and duration. No empirical studies to date have directly compared how combined physical and cognitive training offered at different training frequencies affects cognitive function for older adults with cognitive decline. This study investigated the impact of training frequency on cognitive outcomes after combined physical and cognitive training for older adults with cognitive decline. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in community facilities and day care centers. The study assigned 89 older adults with cognitive decline into high-frequency (HF) or low-frequency (LF) training groups. The participants received 90- to 105-min training sessions, one (LF) or three (HF) times a week, for 12 weeks. Outcome measures were the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Word List subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and Stroop Color Word Test. RESULTS: The HF group demonstrated greater improvement in immediate memory measured by the WL-IM (F = 8.7, P = 0.004) and in executive function measured by the SCWT (F = 5.89, P = 0.017) than the LF group. Compared with the HF group, the LF group showed a great improvement in delayed memory measured by the WL-DM (F = 9.62, P = 0.003). The HF and LF groups both increased in processing speed and global cognitive function. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that the different training frequency of combined physical and cognitive training may result in benefits on different cognitive functions in older adults with cognitive decline. These findings may assist clinical practitioners in choosing appropriate training frequencies based on various intervention purposes for the elderly with cognitive decline. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03619577 (08/08/2018).


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction , Cognitive Training , Aged , Humans , Cognition , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Cognitive Dysfunction/therapy , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Executive Function , Physical Examination
5.
Toxins (Basel) ; 14(6)2022 06 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35737076

ABSTRACT

Effects of the combined task-oriented trainings with botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injection on improving motor functions and reducing spasticity remains unclear. This study aims to investigate effects of 3 task-oriented trainings (robot-assisted therapy (RT), mirror therapy (MT), and active control treatment (AC)) in patients with stroke after BoNT-A injection. Thirty-seven patients with chronic spastic hemiplegic stroke were randomly assigned to receive RT, MT, or AC following BoNT-A injection over spastic upper extremity muscles. Each session of RT, MT, and AC was 75 min, 3 times weekly, for 8 weeks. Outcome measures were assessed at pretreatment, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up, involving the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Motor Activity Log (MAL), including amount of use (AOU) and quality of movement (QOM), and arm activity level. All 3 combined treatments improved FMA, MAS, and MAL. The AC induced a greater effect on QOM in MAL at the 3-month follow-up than RT or MT. All 3 combined trainings induced minimal effect on arm activity level. Our findings suggest that for patients with stroke who received BoNT-A injection over spastic UE muscles, the RT, MT, or AC UE training that followed was effective in improving motor functions, reducing spasticity, and enhancing daily function.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Robotics , Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Humans , Mirror Movement Therapy , Muscle Spasticity/drug therapy , Muscle Spasticity/etiology , Pilot Projects , Stroke/complications , Stroke/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Upper Extremity
6.
Am J Occup Ther ; 76(2)2022 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35201299

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Baseline global cognitive function may affect cognitive and functional outcomes during combined physical and cognitive training; however, how it influences the effects of combined training remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of baseline global cognitive function on cognitive and functional outcomes after combined physical and cognitive training among older adults with cognitive decline. DESIGN: Observational. SETTING: Local communities and senior centers. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults with mild cognitive decline (MCD; n = 51) and moderate to severe cognitive decline (MSCD; n = 40). INTERVENTION: Participants received 45 to 55 min of physical exercise training followed by 45 to 55 min of cognitive training in one session per week for 12 wk. Outcomes and Measures: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (Lawton-Brody IADL), Word Recall Test (WRT), Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT), Digital Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and Trail Making Test (TMT) scores were assessed and compared between the MCD and MSCD groups. RESULTS: Significant interaction effects were found for the WRT, SCWT, MoCA, and Lawton-Brody IADL. WRT and SCWT scores significantly improved in the MCD group, whereas MoCA and Lawton-Brody IADL scores significantly improved in the MSCD group. DSST scores increased among all participants, but TMT scores improved only in the MCD group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Older adults' baseline global cognitive function affected cognitive and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) outcomes regarding combined training. High-level cognitive function, including inhibition and shifting abilities and working memory capacity, improved among older adults with MCD, whereas general cognitive function and IADLs improved among older adults with MSCD. What This Article Adds: Findings revealed domain-specific changes with respect to baseline cognitive function, which may help to refine current combined training protocols and facilitate development of personalized combined training programs for older adults with cognitive impairments.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Cognitive Dysfunction , Aged , Cognition , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Exercise , Humans , Trail Making Test
7.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 690, 2022 01 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35027612

ABSTRACT

Stroke individuals' daily function has been demonstrated to be influenced by their somatosensory capability, cognitive capability, and upper extremity (UE) motor abilities. However, the structural relationships among these abilities on stroke individuals' independence in daily function remain unclear. We analyzed the pretest measures of 153 stroke individuals in outpatient rehabilitation settings by structural equation modeling to determine the structural relationship among somatosensory capability, UE muscle strength, UE motor function, and cognitive capability that influences independence in daily function. The standardized results indicated somatosensory capability negatively influenced UE muscle strength, but positively influenced UE muscle strength mediated by UE motor function. UE muscle strength, then, positively influenced individuals' independence in daily function. On the other hand, somatosensory capability positively influenced cognitive capability, which marginally and positively affected the performance of independence in daily function. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the influence of somatosensory capability on the daily function is mediated mainly by motor functions and marginally by cognitive capability. This structural model may allow future clinical therapists to design more effective task-related training protocols to promote the independence in daily function for stroke individuals.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Cognition/physiology , Motor Activity/physiology , Somatosensory Cortex/physiopathology , Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke/physiopathology , Stroke/psychology , Upper Extremity/physiopathology , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Strength
8.
Top Stroke Rehabil ; 29(4): 255-264, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34340637

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objectives are to evaluate the effects of a sequential combination of aerobic exercise and cognitive training, compared with exercise or cognitive training alone, on cognitive function, physical function, daily function, quality of life, and social participation in stroke survivors with cognitive impairment. METHODS: This is a single-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial. Stroke patients with mild cognitive impairment (n = 56) were randomly assigned to aerobic exercise training (n = 18), computerized cognitive training (n = 18), and the sequential combination of aerobic exercise and computerized cognitive training (n = 20) group. All groups underwent training 60 min/day, 3 days/week, for a total of 12 weeks. The primary outcomes included Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition, and the Stroop color-word test. Secondary outcomes were the Timed Up and Go test, 6-Minute Walk Test, Functional Independence Measure, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, Community Integration Questionnaire, and Stroke Impact Scale. RESULTS: 56 participants completed the trial. Compared with a single type of aerobic exercise or cognitive training, the combined training group showed significant improvement in MoCA (P < .05, η2 = 0.13), and two sub-tests in WMS-III (both P's < 0.05) following the intervention. However, no between-group differences were observed for physical functions, daily function, quality of life, and social participation measures. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide evidence for the potential synergistic intervention in stroke survivors. Future studies investigating the transfer effects and the optimal training parameters with a larger sample is needed.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Stroke , Cognition , Computers , Exercise , Exercise Therapy , Humans , Postural Balance , Quality of Life , Single-Blind Method , Stroke/complications , Stroke/psychology , Stroke/therapy , Time and Motion Studies , Treatment Outcome
9.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 102(8): 1588-1594, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33839104

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether self-efficacy (SE) mediates or moderates the relationship between motor ability at pretest and functional use of the affected arm at posttest in task-related training for stroke. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation settings. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty patients with chronic stroke (N=80). INTERVENTIONS: The training was delivered to the participants for 60-90 min/session, 3-5 sessions/wk for 4-6 weeks. The training involved specific robot-assisted, mirror, or combined therapy, followed by functional task practice for approximately 30 minutes in each session. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measure was the perceived amount of functional arm use and quality of movement evaluated by the Motor Activity Log (MAL) at posttest. The predictor was scores on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)-Upper Extremity subscale at pretest. The tested mediator and moderator were scores on the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ) at pretest and posttest. RESULTS: The SSEQ scores at pretest and posttest moderated the predictive relationship of pretest FMA to posttest MAL. The interaction between pretest FMA and SSEQ accounted for an additional 3.14%-5.37% of the variance in the posttest MAL. The predictive relationship between FMA and MAL was its greatest when the SSEQ was high, with a less amplified positive relationship at low levels of SSEQ. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest the evaluation of SE at pretest for a better prediction of an individual patient's functional arm use after an intervention and recommend aiming at SE during training to make the most of motor ability transferred to functional use. Future research may compare the effectiveness of task-related training with and without SE building to verify the findings of this study.


Subject(s)
Physical Functional Performance , Self Efficacy , Stroke Rehabilitation , Upper Extremity/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Exoskeleton Device , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Robotics/methods
10.
Am J Occup Ther ; 74(6): 7406205050p1-7406205050p8, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33275565

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Identifying cognitive or physical limitations that contribute to difficulties in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) is critical for adequate intervention with community-dwelling older adults with cognitive decline. OBJECTIVE: To establish the validity and responsiveness of an IADL scale based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (the ICF-IADL) with respect to both cognitive and physical limitations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Multiple community care and senior centers. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-two older adults. INTERVENTION: Combination of physical exercise and cognitive training. MEASURES: Five criterion measures-Lawton IADL Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSS), Word Lists Test (WLT), and Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). RESULTS: The ICF-IADL's three summary scales-Disability Index (DI), Cognitive Disability Index (CDI), and Physical Disability Index (PDI)-had good concurrent validity with the Lawton IADL Scale. The DI and CDI had moderate to good associations with the MoCA. The DI's and CDI's predictive validity for scores on the Lawton IADL Scale, MoCA, and TUG was moderate to good and that of the PDI was fair. Responsiveness was large for the DI, moderate for the CDI, and small for the PDI. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The ICF-IADL can be used to measure disability in IADLs related to cognitive and physical limitations. The DI and CDI were better than the PDI in predicting outcomes in general cognitive function and dynamic balance and were more responsive to change after intervention than the PDI. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: The ICF-IADL addresses both cognitive and physical limitations and can be a valid assessment of IADLs. Occupational therapists can use it to determine difficulties in IADLs and causes of those difficulties, guide treatment planning, and monitor intervention effectiveness with community-dwelling older adults with cognitive decline.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Cognitive Dysfunction , Aged , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disability Evaluation , Humans , Postural Balance , Psychometrics , Time and Motion Studies
11.
Am J Occup Ther ; 73(1): 7301205130p1-7301205130p10, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30839268

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We examined problem behavior in preschool- and school-age children with autism spectrum disorder and assessed whether sensory processing dysfunction (SPD) and parenting stress were differentially associated with problem behaviors in these groups of children. METHOD: Participants were 101 preschool- and 61 school-age children. An independent t test was used to examine group differences in problem behaviors. Pearson correlation analysis and multiple linear regression were conducted to identify associations among SPD, parenting stress, and problem behaviors. RESULTS: Preschool children had more social withdrawal than school-age children. Moderately negative correlations were found between SPD and problem behaviors among preschool children. Parenting stress was a factor associated with problem behaviors in both groups, whereas SPD was a factor specific to preschoolers. CONCLUSION: Understanding unique problem behaviors and the significant role of SPD and parenting stress in problem behaviors could help occupational therapy clinicians plan interventions accordingly.


Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder/psychology , Parenting/psychology , Parents/psychology , Problem Behavior , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Mothers
12.
Phys Ther ; 97(10): 1030-1040, 2017 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29029552

ABSTRACT

Background: The Motor Activity Log (MAL) and Lower-Functioning MAL (LF-MAL) are used to assess the amount of use of the more impaired arm and the quality of movement during activities in real-life situations for patients with stroke. Objective: This study used Rasch analysis to examine the psychometric properties of the MAL and LF-MAL in patients with stroke. Design: This is a methodological study. Methods: The MAL and LF-MAL include 2 scales: the amount of use (AOU) and the quality of movement (QOM). Rasch analysis was used to examine the unidimensionality, item difficulty hierarchy, targeting, reliability, and differential item functioning (DIF) of the MAL and LF-MAL. Results: A total of 403 patients with mild or moderate stroke completed the MAL, and 134 patients with moderate/severe stroke finished the LF-MAL. Evidence of disordered thresholds and poor model fit were found both in the MAL and LF-MAL. After the rating categories were collapsed and misfit items were deleted, all items of the revised MAL and LF-MAL exhibited ordering and constituted unidimensional constructs. The person-item map showed that these assessments were difficult for our participants. The person reliability coefficients of these assessments ranged from .79 to .87. No items in the revised MAL and LF-MAL exhibited bias related to patients' characteristics. Limitations: One limitation is the recruited patients, who have relatively high-functioning ability in the LF-MAL. Conclusions: The revised MAL and LF-MAL are unidimensional scales and have good reliability. The categories function well, and responses to all items in these assessments are not biased by patients' characteristics. However, the revised MAL and LF-MAL both showed floor effect. Further study might add easy items for assessing the performance of activity in real-life situations for patients with stroke.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Motor Activity/physiology , Self Report , Stroke/physiopathology , Arm/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Movement/physiology , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Stroke Rehabilitation , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Am J Occup Ther ; 70(2): 7002290040p1-8, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26943116

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study establishes the concurrent validity, predictive validity, and responsiveness of the Revised Nottingham Sensation Assessment (rNSA) during rehabilitation for people with stroke. METHOD: The study recruited 147 patients with stroke. The main assessment used was the rNSA, and outcome measures were the Fugl-Meyer Assessment sensory subscale (FMA-S) and motor subscale (FMA-M) and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) scale. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients were good to excellent between the rNSA and the FMA-S. The rNSA proprioception measure was a predictor for the FMA-S. The rNSA stereognosis and tactile-pinprick measures for the proximal upper limb were predictors for the FMA-M and the NEADL scale, respectively. Responsiveness was moderate to large for three subscales of the rNSA (standardized response mean = .51-.83). CONCLUSION: This study may support the concurrent validity, predictive validity, and responsiveness of the rNSA for people with stroke.


Subject(s)
Hypesthesia/diagnosis , Sensation , Stroke Rehabilitation , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Hypesthesia/etiology , Hypesthesia/rehabilitation , Male , Middle Aged , Neurological Rehabilitation , Occupational Therapy/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Recovery of Function , Somatosensory Disorders/diagnosis , Somatosensory Disorders/etiology , Somatosensory Disorders/rehabilitation , Stroke/complications
14.
Int J Rehabil Res ; 30(4): 327-32, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17975453

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper was to investigate the cooccurrence of problems in activity level, attention, reading, writing and psychosocial adjustment of children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD). A parent-report questionnaire, the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire - Chinese version (DCDQ-C), was used to screen first to third graders from 13 mainstream schools in Taipei. Two standardized motor tests were then administered to those who scored below 10% on the DCDQ-C. Tests of activity level, attention, reading, writing and psychosocial adjustment were then administered to this sample. Thirty-eight children identified as DCD, 32 as suspect for DCD and 82 as normal comparison were included in the final sample. Multivariate analysis of variance comparing the three groups (DCD, suspect DCD, and comparison) revealed that both children with DCD and suspect for DCD obtained significantly poorer scores on measures of attention and reading, and were more hyperactive than comparison children. Children with DCD and suspect for DCD were also reported to have more internalizing and social problems than children without motor problems. No significant differences, however, were noted between children with different degree of motor coordination problems (categorized as DCD and suspect for DCD) on any measure. Furthermore, a high percentage of children in both the DCD and suspect groups fell in the clinical range of attention, activity level and psychosocial adjustment problems. The results revealed a high risk for these problems in nonreferred children with motor coordination problems. The high percentage of clinical range behavioral problems warrants attention of clinicians who work with children with motor coordination difficulties to the need to promote early identification and referral.


Subject(s)
Agraphia/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Dyslexia/epidemiology , Motor Skills Disorders/epidemiology , Social Adjustment , Agraphia/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Child , Child Behavior Disorders/diagnosis , Child Behavior Disorders/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dyslexia/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Internal-External Control , Male , Mass Screening , Motor Skills Disorders/diagnosis , Taiwan
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...