Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Pain Med ; 23(5): 934-954, 2022 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34373915

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This review investigated the effectiveness of clinical interventions on depressive symptoms in people with all types of chronic pain. METHODS: We searched seven electronic databases and reference lists on September 15, 2020, and included English-language, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of trials that examined the effects of clinical interventions on depressive outcomes in chronic pain. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and assessed the risk of bias. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019131871. RESULTS: Eighty-three reviews were selected and included 182 meta-analyses. Data were summarized visually and narratively using standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals as the primary outcome of interest. A large proportion of meta-analyses investigated fibromyalgia or mixed chronic pain, and psychological interventions were most commonly evaluated. Acceptance and commitment therapy for general chronic pain, and fluoxetine and web-based psychotherapy for fibromyalgia showed the most robust effects and can be prioritized for implementation in clinical practice. Exercise for arthritis, pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain, self-regulatory psychotherapy for axial pain, and music therapy for general chronic pain showed large, significant effects, but estimates were derived from low- or critically low-quality reviews. CONCLUSIONS: No single intervention type demonstrated substantial superiority across multiple pain populations. Other dimensions beyond efficacy, such as accessibility, safety, cost, patient preference, and efficacy for non-depressive outcomes should also be weighed when considering treatment options. Further effectiveness research is required for common pain types such as arthritis and axial pain, and common interventions such as opioids, anti-inflammatories and acupuncture.


Subject(s)
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy , Arthritis , Chronic Pain , Fibromyalgia , Chronic Pain/psychology , Chronic Pain/therapy , Depression/therapy , Fibromyalgia/therapy , Humans
2.
Chiropr Man Therap ; 29(1): 23, 2021 07 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34238325

ABSTRACT

Sleep problems are common and may be associated with persistent pain. It is unclear whether non-pharmacological interventions improve sleep and pain in adults with comorbid sleep problems and musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. We conducted a systematic review on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on sleep characteristics among adults with MSK pain and comorbid sleep problems. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central and PsycINFO from inception to April 2, 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort, and case-control studies. Pairs of independent reviewers critically appraised and extracted data from eligible studies. We synthesized the findings qualitatively. We screened 8459 records and identified two RCTs (six articles, 467 participants). At 9 months, in adults with insomnia and osteoarthritis pain, cognitive behavioral therapy for pain and insomnia (CBT-PI) was effective at improving sleep (Insomnia Severity Index, ISI) when compared to education (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.25, 3.90) or CBT for pain (CBT-P) (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.22, 8.43). CBP-P vs. education was effective at increasing sleep efficiency (wrist actigraphy) in a subgroup of participants with severe pain at baseline (mean difference 5.45, 95% CI 1.56, 9.33). At 18 months, CBT-PI, CBT-P and education had similar effectiveness on sleep and pain or health outcomes. In adults with insomnia and knee osteoarthritis, CBT-I improved some sleep outcomes including sleep efficiency (diary) at 3 months (Cohen's d 0.39, 95% CI 0.24, 1.18), and self-reported sleep quality (ISI) at 6 months (Cohen's d - 0.62, 95% CI -1.01, - 0.07). The intervention was no better than placebo (behavioural desensitization) for improving other sleep outcomes related to sleep onset or pain outcomes. Short-term improvement in sleep was associated with pain reduction at 6 months (WOMAC pain subscale) (sensitivity 54.8%, specificity 81.4%). Overall, in two acceptable quality RCTs of adults with OA and comorbid insomnia, CBT-PI/I may improve some sleep outcomes in the short term, but not pain outcomes in the short or long-term. Clinically significant improvements in sleep in the short term may improve longer term pain outcomes. Further high-quality research is needed to evaluate other non-pharmacological interventions for people with comorbid sleep problems and a range of MSK conditions.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Musculoskeletal Pain/therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Sleep Wake Disorders/therapy , Humans
3.
Pain Physician ; 24(1): 61-72, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33400428

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Psychological comorbidities in chronic pain (CP) are common and contribute to adverse health outcomes and poor quality of life. Evidence-based guidance for the management of depressive symptoms in CP is limited, particularly for mind-body interventions. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of mind-body interventions for the management of depressive symptoms in people with CP. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review (SR) of SRs. SETTING: SRs with meta-analyses of clinical interventions for the management of depressive symptoms in people with CP. METHODS: This SR was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic searches were performed for MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AMED, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Joanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports from inception to March 14, 2019. Reference lists and overviews were also hand-searched. SRs of mind-body interventions for CP were included if they conducted a meta-analysis of depression outcomes in people with any CP type not including headache. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and evaluated the quality of articles found. Quality was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 criteria and data were summarized narratively with standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals of the depression outcome. RESULTS: Eleven SRs with 20 distinct meta-analyses demonstrated a small to moderate beneficial effect for mind-body interventions (effect sizes: -0.05 to -0.63). LIMITATIONS: Depressive symptomatology was a subordinate concern compared with other outcomes. The primary literature base was reasonably broad with 33 primary studies, but small when compared with the number of meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Mind-body interventions show consistent small to moderate effects in reducing depressive symptoms in CP. The literature in this area demonstrates understudy and oversynthesis. There is a need for more clinical trials focusing on people with axial pain, people with comorbid major depressive disorder, and with depression as the primary outcome of interest. Full SR registered on PROSPERO: CRD42019131871.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/psychology , Depression/etiology , Depression/therapy , Mind-Body Therapies/methods , Humans
4.
J Can Chiropr Assoc ; 64(1): 76-81, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32476670

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To present the clinical case of a patient with an upper extremity superficial venous thrombosis (SVT), and to highlight the importance for clinicians working in musculoskeletal care settings, to considered non-musculoskeletal causes for their patients' presentations. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 31-year-old male presented to an academic chiropractic clinic with progressive left sided tension over the medial arm, extending to the anterior aspect of his proximal forearm. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: The patient was initially diagnosed with possible biceps/brachialis muscular strain and peripheral entrapment of the median nerve. A course of treatment involving soft tissue therapy was initiated. Unfortunately, the patient's symptoms worsened, and on further evaluation, near full occlusion and phlebitis of the left cephalic vein was discovered. Symptoms dissipated over the next few days with conservative medicinal efforts. SUMMARY: Although not often viewed as a serious condition, or factored in the differential diagnoses of musculoskeletal practitioners, to not consider SVT as a cause of a patient's symptoms may lead to a protracted clinical course and increased discomfort for the patient, and in rare cases, more serious consequences.


OBJECTIF: Présenter le cas d'un patient ayant une thrombose veineuse superficielle (TVS) du membre supérieur et souligner l'importance pour le clinicien dans un établissement de traitement de troubles musculosquelettiques de prendre en compte les causes qui ne sont pas d'origine musculosquelettique dans l'étude du tableau clinique du patient. CARACTÉRISTIQUES CLINIQUES: Un homme de 31 ans s'est présenté à une clinique chiropratique universitaire en raison d'une tension progressive ressentie à partir de la partie médiane du bras gauche jusqu'à la face antérieure de l'avant-bras proximal. INTERVENTION ET RÉSULTAT: On a d'abord évoqué la possibilité d'une foulure du biceps ou du muscle brachial antérieur et d'un englobement périphérique du nerf médian. Une thérapie des tissus mous a été amorcée. Mais malheureusement, les symptômes du patient se sont aggravés et, après une évaluation plus approfondie, on a découvert une occlusion presque complète de la veine céphalique gauche et une phlébite. Les symptômes se sont dissipés au cours des jours qui ont suivi le début d'un traitement conservateur par des médicaments. RÉSUMÉ: La TVS n'est pas souvent considérée comme une affection grave et n'est pas prise en compte dans les diagnostics différentiels posés par les praticiens de l'appareil locomoteur. En ne la considérant pas comme une possible cause des symptômes d'un patient, on risque de prolonger les interventions et d'aggraver la gêne du patient, et dans de rares cas, de causer des conséquences plus graves.

5.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 42(4): 237-246, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31221495

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to create a system dynamics (SD) model, including published data and required assumptions, as a tool for future research identifying the role of chiropractic care in the management of chronic, nonmalignant pain in a Canadian population. METHODS: We present an illustrative case description of how we evaluated the feasibility of conducting a large-scale clinical trial to assess the impact of chiropractic care in mitigating excessive opioid use in Canada. We applied SD modeling using current evidence and key assumptions where such evidence was lacking. Modeling outcomes were highlighted to determine which potential factors were necessary to account for compelling study designs. RESULTS: Results suggest that a future clinical study diverting patients with nonmalignant musculoskeletal pain early to the chiropractic stream of care could be most effective. System dynamics modeling also highlighted design challenges resulting from unresearched assumptions that needed to be proxied for model completion. Assumptions included changing rates in opioid-associated deaths and rates of success in treatment management of addicted patients. CONCLUSION: In this case, SD modeling identified current research gaps and strong contenders for appropriate follow-up questions in a clinical research domain, namely the role of chiropractic care in the management of chronic, nonmalignant pain in a Canadian population.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/therapy , Decision Support Techniques , Models, Theoretical , Musculoskeletal Pain/therapy , Canada , Chiropractic/methods , Humans , Manipulation, Chiropractic , Opioid-Related Disorders/prevention & control
6.
Clin J Pain ; 33(1): 71-86, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27022675

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of passive physical modalities for the management of soft tissue injuries of the elbow. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1990 to 2015. Studies meeting our selection criteria were eligible for critical appraisal. Random pairs of independent reviewers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. We included studies with a low risk of bias in our best evidence synthesis. RESULTS: We screened 6618 articles; 21 were eligible for critical appraisal and 9 (reporting on 8 randomized controlled trials) had a low risk of bias. All randomized controlled trials with a low risk of bias focused on lateral epicondylitis. We found that adding transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to primary care does not improve the outcome of patients with lateral epicondylitis. We found inconclusive evidence for the effectiveness of: (1) an elbow brace for managing lateral epicondylitis of variable duration; and (2) shockwave therapy or low-level laser therapy for persistent lateral epicondylitis. DISCUSSION: Our review suggests that transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation provides no added benefit to patients with lateral epicondylitis. The effectiveness of an elbow brace, shockwave therapy, or low-level laser therapy for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis is inconclusive. We found little evidence to inform the use of passive physical modalities for the management of elbow soft tissue injuries.


Subject(s)
Elbow Injuries , Physical Therapy Modalities , Soft Tissue Injuries/rehabilitation , Disease Management , Humans , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Tennis Elbow/rehabilitation
7.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 39(2): 95-109.e2, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26976373

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal care for the management of soft tissue injuries of the lower extremity. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1990 to 2015. Random pairs of independent reviewers screened studies for relevance and critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. We included studies with a low risk of bias in our best evidence synthesis. RESULTS: We screened 6794 articles. Six studies had a low risk of bias and addressed the following: plantar heel pain (n = 2), adductor-related groin pain (n = 1), and patellofemoral pain (n = 3). The evidence suggests that multimodal care for the management of persistent plantar heel pain may include mobilization and stretching exercise. An intensive, clinic-based, group exercise program (strengthening, stretching, balance, agility) is more effective than multimodal care for the management of adductor-related groin pain in male athletes. There is inconclusive evidence to support the use of multimodal care for the management of persistent patellofemoral pain. Our search did not identify any low risk of bias studies examining multimodal care for the management of other soft tissue injuries of the lower extremity. CONCLUSION: A multimodal program of care for the management of persistent plantar heel pain may include mobilization and stretching exercise. Multimodal care for adductor-related groin pain is not recommended based on the current evidence. There is inconclusive evidence to support the use of multimodal care for the management of persistent patellofemoral pain.


Subject(s)
Lower Extremity/injuries , Soft Tissue Injuries/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Patient Outcome Assessment , Physical Therapy Modalities , Systematic Reviews as Topic
8.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 39(2): 121-139.e1, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26976375

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of multimodal care for the management of soft tissue injuries of the shoulder. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1990 to 2015. Two independent reviewers critically appraised studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. We used best evidence synthesis to synthesize evidence from studies with low risk of bias. RESULTS: We screened 5885 articles, and 19 were eligible for critical appraisal. Ten randomized controlled trials had low risk of bias. For persistent subacromial impingement syndrome, multimodal care leads to similar outcomes as sham therapy, radial extracorporeal shock-wave therapy, or surgery. For subacromial impingement syndrome, multimodal care may be associated with small and nonclinically important improvement in pain and function compared with corticosteroid injections. For rotator cuff tendinitis, dietary-based multimodal care may be more effective than conventional multimodal care (exercise, soft tissue and manual therapy, and placebo tablets). For nonspecific shoulder pain, multimodal care may be more effective than wait list or usual care by a general practitioner, but it leads to similar outcomes as exercise or corticosteroid injections. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence suggests that combining multiple interventions into 1 program of care does not lead to superior outcomes for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome or nonspecific shoulder pain. One randomized controlled trial suggested that dietary-based multimodal care (dietary advice, acupuncture, and enzyme tablets) may provide better outcomes over conventional multimodal care. However, these results need to be replicated.


Subject(s)
Shoulder Injuries/therapy , Soft Tissue Injuries/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Physical Therapy Modalities , Systematic Reviews as Topic
9.
J Can Chiropr Assoc ; 59(2): 143-9, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26136606

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is limited research related to spinal manipulation of uncomplicated thoracic spine pain and even less when pain is associated with comorbid conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. In the absence of trial evidence, clinical experience and appropriate selection of the type of intervention is important to informing the appropriate management of these cases. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a patient with long standing rheumatoid arthritis who presented with acute thoracic pain. The patient was diagnosed with costovertebral joint dysfunction and a myofascial strain of the surrounding musculature. The patient was unresponsive to treatment involving a generalized manipulative technique; however, improved following the administration of a specific applied manipulation with modified forces. The patient was deemed recovered and discharged with ergonomic and home care recommendations. DISCUSSION: This case demonstrates a clinical situation where there is a paucity of research to guide management, thus clinicians must rely on experience and patient preferences in the selection of an appropriate and safe therapeutic intervention. The case highlights the need to contextualize the apparent contraindication of manipulation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and calls for further research. Finally the paper advances evidence based decision making that balances the available research, clinical experience, as well as patient preferences.


HISTORIQUE: Il existe peu d'études sur la manipulation vertébrale de douleur de la colonne dorsale sans complication, et encore moins lorsque la douleur est associée à des conditions comorbides comme la polyarthrite rhumatoïde. En l'absence de résultats d'essais cliniques, l'expérience clinique et le choix approprié du type d'intervention sont importants pour trouver la gestion appropriée de ces cas. PRÉSENTATION DE CAS: Nous présentons le cas d'un patient souffrant de polyarthrite rhumatoïde de longue date avec une douleur thoracique aiguë. Le patient a reçu un diagnostic de dysfonctionnement de l'articulation costo-vertébrale et une tension myofasciale de la masse musculaire qui l'enveloppe. Le patient ne répondait pas au traitement comprenant une technique de manipulation généralisée; cependant, il a démontré une amélioration à la suite de l'administration d'une manipulation spécifique avec des forces modifiées. Le patient a été jugé rétabli et a obtenu son congé avec des recommandations de soins ergonomiques et à domicile. DISCUSSION: Ce cas illustre une situation clinique où il y a n'y a pas assez d'études permettant d'orienter la gestion; par conséquent, les cliniciens doivent s'appuyer sur l'expérience et les préférences du patient pour choisir une intervention de traitement appropriée et sécuritaire. Ce cas souligne le besoin de contextualiser la contre-indication apparente de la manipulation chez les patients avec de l'arthrite rhumatoïde et le besoin de recherche supplémentaire. Finalement, l'étude préconise un processus décisionnel fondé sur des preuves qui équilibrent les études consultables, l'expérience en clinique et les préférences du patient.

10.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 38(9): 672-676, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24387889

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Controversy surrounds the safety of cervical spine manipulation. Ischemic stroke secondary to cervical spine manipulation is a hypothesized adverse event. In Canada, the seriousness of these events and their perceived association to cervical spine manipulation has led some members of the public to call for a ban of the procedure. The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence of internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection after cervical spine manipulation in patients who experience neck pain and its associated disorders. The secondary objective was to determine whether cervical spine manipulation is associated with an increased risk of ICA dissection in patients with neck pain, upper back pain, or headaches. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Alternative Health, AMED, Index to Chiropractic Literature, and EMBASE from 1970 to November 2012. Two independent reviewers used standardized criteria to screen the eligibility of articles. We considered cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized clinical trials that addressed our objectives. We planned to critically appraise eligible articles using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network methodology. RESULTS: We did not find any epidemiologic studies that measured the incidence of cervical spine manipulation and ICA dissection. Similarly, we did not find any studies that determined whether cervical spine manipulation is associated with ICA dissection. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ICA dissection after cervical spine manipulation is unknown. The relative risk of ICA dissection after cervical spine manipulation compared with other health care interventions for neck pain, back pain, or headache is also unknown. Although several case reports and case series raise the hypothesis of an association, we found no epidemiologic studies that validate this hypothesis.


Subject(s)
Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection/etiology , Manipulation, Spinal/adverse effects , Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Neck
11.
J Can Chiropr Assoc ; 57(1): 69-75, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23483000

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Urolithiasis refers to renal or ureteral calculi referred to in lay terminology as a kidney stone. Utolithiasis is a potential emergency often resulting in acute abdominal, low back, flank or groin pain. Chiropractors may encounter patients when they are in acute pain or after they have recovered from the acute phase and should be knowledgeable about the signs, symptoms, potential complications and appropriate recommendations for management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 52 year old male with acute right flank pain presented to the emergency department. A ureteric calculus with associated hydronephrosis was identified and he was prescribed pain medications and discharged to pass the stone naturally. One day later, he returned to the emergency department with severe pain and was referred to urology. He was managed with a temporary ureteric stent and antibiotics. CONCLUSION: This case describes a patient with acute right flank and lower quadrant pain which was diagnosed as an obstructing ureteric calculus. Acute management and preventive strategies in patients with visceral pathology such as renal calculi must be considered in patients with severe back and flank pain as it can progress to hydronephrosis and kidney failure.


CONTEXTE: La lithiase urinaire se réfère à des calculs rénaux ou urétéraux connus plus communément comme des calculs rénaux. La lithiase urinaire présente une urgence potentielle qui entraîne souvent des douleurs aiguës à l'abdomen, au dos, à la colonne lombaire, au flanc ou à l'aine. Les chiropraticiens peuvent rencontrer les patients quand ceux-ci éprouvent des douleurs aiguës ou après s'être remis de la phase aiguë et devraient donc connaître les signes, les symptômes, les complications possibles et les recommandations appropriées de gestion. EXPOSÉ DE CAS: Un homme de 52 ans éprouvant des douleurs aiguës au flanc droit s'est présenté à l'urgence. Un calcul urétéral avec hydronéphrose associée a été décelé et on lui a prescrit des analgésiques et on l'a renvoyé chez lui pour passer les calculs rénaux sans intervention. Le lendemain il est retourné aux urgences avec une douleur intense et a été renvoyé à l'urologie, où on lui a posé une endoprothèse urétérale temporaire et prescrit des antibiotiques. CONCLUSION: Ce cas décrit un patient souffrant d'une douleur aiguë au flanc et au quadrant inférieur droits. Le diagnostic posé indiquait des calculs urétéraux obstructifs. Il faut envisager des stratégies de prévention et de gestion à court terme pour les patients atteints de pathologies viscérales telles que des calculs rénaux avec des douleurs sévères au dos et au flanc, sinon cela peut mener à une hydronéphrose et une insuffisance rénale.

12.
J Chiropr Educ ; 26(1): 32-9, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22778528

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Interprofessional collaboration in health care is believed to enhance patient outcomes. However, where professions have overlapping scopes of practice (eg, chiropractors and physical therapists), "turf wars" can hinder effective collaboration. Deep-rooted beliefs, identified as implicit attitudes, provide a potential explanation. Even with positive explicit attitudes toward a social group, negative stereotypes may be influential. Previous studies on interprofessional attitudes have mostly used qualitative research methodologies. This study used quantitative methods to evaluate explicit and implicit attitudes of physical therapy students toward chiropractic. METHODS: A paper-and-pencil instrument was developed and administered to 49 individuals (students and faculty) associated with a Canadian University master's entry-level physical therapy program after approval by the Research Ethics Board. The instrument evaluated explicit and implicit attitudes toward the chiropractic profession. Implicit attitudes were determined by comparing response times of chiropractic paired with positive versus negative descriptors. RESULTS: Mean time to complete a word association task was significantly longer (t = 4.75, p =.00) when chiropractic was associated with positive rather than negative words. Explicit and implicit attitudes were not correlated (r = 0.13, p =.38). CONCLUSIONS: While little explicit bias existed, individuals associated with a master's entry-level physical therapy program appeared to have a significant negative implicit bias toward chiropractic.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...