Verifying a C-arm-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis protocol for assessing tibial implant movement in total knee arthroplasty.

Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) is the "gold standard" technique for measuring sub-millimetric relative motion between implant and bone to quantify post-operative implant migration over time. The vast majority of RSA studies addressing implant motion in knee replacements, however, have been conducted using expensive biplanar radiography systems and commercial software that are not readily available at many institutions. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of performing RSA using ordinary, readily available C-arm fluoroscopes and open-source software to assess tibial component migration.We developed an assessment protocol using a Siemens Arcadis Orbic C-arm and the open-source XROMM software and evaluated its accuracy and precision through a series of phantom-based verification tests. The results were highly promising: accuracies were in the range of - 39 to 11 µm for translations and - 0.025 to 0.029° for rotations, while system precisions ranged between 16 to 27 µm for translations and 0.041 to 0.059° for rotations. This performance is comparable to specialized RSA systems reported in the literature. The proposed RSA protocol is therefore capable of accurately measuring the relative motion of knee replacement implants in phantom scenarios, which justifies further the development of the protocol towards use in prospective clinical assessments of new implant designs and surgical techniques.

Incorporating neck biomechanics in helmet testing: Evaluation of commercially available WaveCel helmets.

BACKGROUND: Cycling helmets often incorporate elements aimed to dissipate rotational energies, which is widely acknowledged to play a key role in concussion mechanics. In this study, we investigated the mechanics of an oblique helmet test protocol that induced helmet rotation while using it to evaluate the effectiveness of three helmet models: two standard expanded polystyrene helmets and a commercially-available helmet equipped with a liner designed to mitigate linear and rotational energies. METHODS: Helmets equipped with WaveCel were tested against two expanded polystyrene helmet models through guided drops using a Hybrid III (HIII) head-and-neck surrogate. The three helmet models were tested across four impact conditions (n = 5) of different speeds and impact surface angles. FINDINGS: Across all tests, a similar sequence of head motion was observed - first a flexion phase followed by an extension phase. The extension phase lacked evidence of biofidelity and was likely attributable to the energy stored in the neckform during the flexion phase; it was therefore neglected from analysis. Results showed WaveCel reduced the probability of AIS2 head injury across all tests (3 to 27% reductions in 4.8 m/s impacts; 36 to 37% reductions in 6.2 m/s impacts). INTERPRETATION: The two-phased response of the HIII suggests that boundary condition selection can influence results and should thus be reported in studies using similar methods. While this protocol involved both axial and tangential impact components and were thus representative of real-world collisions, the efficacy of WaveCel should be further investigated through additional laboratory studies and tracking real-world cycling injury statistics.